Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Let's Talk About Exotic Fissiles


Recommended Posts

Trash can sized nuclear reactors!

Quote:

A theoretical exercise published in 2006 showed that the smallest possible thermal fission reactor would be a spherical aqueous homogenous one powered by a solution of Am-242m(NO3)3 in water. Its mass would be 4.95 kg, with 0.7 kg of Am-242m nuclear fuel, and diameter 19 cm. Power output would be a few kilowatts. Possible applications are space program and portable high-intensity neutron source. The small size would make it easily shielded.

 

Sourced from:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/nuclear-fuel-cycle/power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors/

 

I doubt superheavy elements such as Americium will be a viable fuel source in the near future, but it's still an interesting topic to discuss. As that snippet mentioned, I think one of the best applications would be in space, where mass is at a premium (though I doubt the savings in mass would be enough to offset the massive materials costs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest issue with any exotic fissile isotopes is that the only primordial actinides on Earth are uranium and thorium.  You would have to transmute these elements into the desired isotopes by a rather tortured, multi-step process that probably wouldn't be that efficient because you'd be getting a bunch of other crap from side reactions.  I suppose a dedicated reactor cycle could get the efficiency up, don't know how much it's been looked at.

 

I'm a fan of Neptunium, personally.  Very low spontaneous fission rate, which is good for high burnup in bombs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • 9 months later...

It provides decent thrust at a high ISP, and it fumigates hippies while doing so.  What's not to love?

 

(and if you say "all the highly radioactive waste it leaves shoots into the atmosphere as high temperature gasses and aerosols," well, the government of Kerbin finds your attitude to be highly counterrevolutionary.)

 

I'm a bit curious about where they thought they were going to get this 233U.  Was there anywhere making the stuff at the time?

 

 

NTRs are probably an exotic enough application they they might deserve exotic fissile fuels.  What are the typical approaches for increasing power density in naval reactors?  Um, that you're allowed to talk about, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Increasing enrichment and therefore loading of 235 per unit volume, mostly.

 

Burnable poisons are pretty helpful if you're cranking up the power density, lets you keep shutdown margin early in life, and as the fuel burns up so will the poisons, so your power curve stays relatively flat for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so increasing power density is simply a matter of increasing the amount of fissioning stuff per cubic furlong.  Makes sense.

 

Would this argue for using something with a highish critical mass, like the aforementioned neptunium?  That way, for a given amount of energy produced, the percent loss of fissile material would be lower and the compensatory mechanisms could be easier to design.

 

(sorry if this is babby's first reactor design 101)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...