Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

The Kerbal Space Program Total Sperg Zone


Sturgeon

Recommended Posts

My current mission is a two-part asteroid capture. I decided that it wasn't realistic to just plop a grabber onto the end of Orion. After all, wouldn't NASA want to use a stock Orion for that mission? Also, while Orion can support crew for up to 21 days, it's not fun sitting in a capsule for that long. So, instead, I created a habitat module with the grabber on the end as a "mission module" that Orion with attached transfer stage can attach to. Here's the habitat atop its DCSS-X (Delta Crygenic Second Stage, J-2X), which has recently separated with its Delta IV 4,8-X (Delta IV, 4 meter fairing, 8 SRBs, J-2X second stage) and is headed into polar orbit as part of a test flight:

9pbHaFf.jpg

 

An Orion, launched atop an SLS Block 1B will rendezvous and dock with it, do some system checks, and then return to Kerbin. This will prove the polar rendezvous concept, paving the way for the asteroid mission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I found myself in a rather interesting situation. I had launched my first interplanetary cruiser without any kind of docking collar, RCS, separable crew reentry capsule, or parachutes. My initial thought was to just recover the brave kerbonauts via EVA to a reentry vehicle, however the cruiser was laden valuable science from the upper atmosphere of Duna, and I wasn't just about to throw that away. This meant that I would have to recover all the science gear from orbit, and I couldn't separate it from the cruiser, so by extension, I had to recover this cruiser (which was now also out of fuel) from orbit around Kerbin. The solution, as you might expect in KSP, was to launch another rocket.

 

This rocket would carry fuel to the cruiser stuck in a parking orbit, which would allow it to de-orbit and reenter Kerbin's atmosphere. While the cruiser had fins to help stabilize it during takeoff, they were much to small and misplaced to act as wings, especially for a vessel with a dry weight somewhere around 40 tons. The LV-N nuclear engines also have terrible atmospheric performance, so using them to cushion the landing was out of the question. The lack of landing gear or struts would also compound the issue of safely coming into contact with the ground. This was going to be a tricky problem to solve. Even trickier if you remember that there is no docking collar on the cruiser, so how was I going to transfer the fuel to even begin this suicidal reentry burn? Well, the answer was in the Klaw. This magical device not only allows you to grab various objects, but in the case of grabbing another ship, it acts just like a docking collar, allowing you to transfer resources between vessels. This would also allow me to attach parachutes to the cruiser, and hopefully in such a way that it would slow the cruiser down enough to safely contact the surface. Well, there is only one way to find out. I decided to launch a rocket.

 

This rocket would primarily consist of the Klaw, a guidance section, and a recovery section at the very nose. Follow this was the main fuel tank and Mainsail engine used for orbital maneuvers, and behind this was the lifting section, used to get the rocket into orbit. The launch went smooth, and everything was on track to a painless rendezvous. It was only after I was about 500m away from the cruiser that I realized that, while I had included a monopropellant tank, I had forgotten the RCS thrusters, and my only method of translating my rocket was with the Mainsail engine. With some very careful maneuvering and throttle control lighter than a feather on Minmus, I was traveling directly at the cruiser at 0.3m/s, well within the minimum speed for the Klaw to secure a solid hold. I made contact with the cruiser with zero issues, attaching directly to the cockpit as a potential failsafe should the vessels integrity succumb to the rigors of atmospheric reentry. Fuel transfer went smooth, and soon my cruiser had ~1000 Δv with which to de-orbit. I detached the Mainsail and its fuel tank, calculated my burn, aligned my ship, and waited for periapsis.

 

I fired the engines at slightly under 100km altitude. It didn't take long to realize that I forgot to account for the extra mass hanging off the hull of my ship. Quickly killing the engine and toggling SAS to hold retrograde, I balanced out the thrust limiters with a quick guesstimate, and restarted my de-orbit burn. The thrust balance wasn't perfect, but it wasn't so much that SAS couldn't compensate and keep the nose pointed in the right direction. I hit atmo at a comfortable 1800m/s and continued to decelerate, burning all my fuel. I didn't want to risk burning up the exposed parachutes, seeing as they were my first and last line of defense against a speedy landing. I will let the pictures tell the rest of the story.

 

y1mrOUo.jpg2uJxPjo.jpg0baqj2P.jpgCpcObcf.jpgTTMRLGH.jpg

 

The drogue chutes were basically superfluous, as it turned out. I was well under 300m/s at an altitude of 4000m, but I deployed them anyways. I was not sure how much of a G loading the klaw could withstand. The decent was quite comfortable, and the CG was still within the footprint of the engine bells. A little bit of help from the SAS made sure that I would land with my nose to the sky, but It probably would have done that naturally. Jeb and Bill made it back safe and sound, and the boys over at R&D got a sizable haul of new science to play with. All in all, just another day in KSP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refueling the interplanetary drive for an Eve/Gilly mission

nKL9bge.jpg

 

 

Launching a reasonable rocket for a change. This is the A5 variant of the command module on its way up to the interplanetary drive.

zEqlDYw.jpg

 

 

Command Module taking all the science from Gilly.

EJxBSfq.jpg

 

 

Eve rise, as seen from the cockpit while orbiting Gilly.

v5XPWtF.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The preparations for and Eeloo mission. The goal is to get to Eeloo, drop off a rover, gather all the science, recover the rover, then return to Kerbin.

 

mechjeb says it has a max delta V of 12.5k, with the main ship having 7.5k It has facilities for up to 20 kerbals and is powered by 24 LV-N engines. The lander/rover itself has approx 1800 delta V, and can house 3 kerbals.

 

 

The main ship has a wet weight of 419.9 tons, while the overall launch vehicle and ship weights about 4000 tons.

 

 

Function testing the main ship that will travel to Eeloo

 

5kKldAb.jpg

 

 

Ready for launch

 

N3Fz0B3.jpg

 

 

120km parking orbit, waiting for crew transfer and phase alignment.

 

TB7wu3V.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerbia Heavy Lift Command hard at work delivering fuel supplies to a desert test site. It's not very fast, but you get this boat up to about 7500m, turn on SAS, and walk away. It will fly its self and hold altitude very well. I Left it running for 50 minutes while I worked on a solidworks project on my drafting computer.

 

OgGZE4t.jpg

aYrLbHj.jpgHjqYPk8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Kerbal Intelligence Agency (K.I.A.) commissioned the KSC engineers to modify a cargo heavy lift cargo plane to land in a remote mountainous area of The Peoples Republic of North Kerbea to deliver some much needed teddy bears... late at night. Well, as the age old saying goes, when you've got a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. The engineers at the KSC decided to fix this problem by adding rockets to the cargo plane. The two forward firing KS-25 engines can take the plane from 100m/s to a dead stop in about one second, while the rear firing KS-25s have enough juice to get the behemoth airborne again in quick order. The first delivery run was successful, and the K.I.A. has expressed interest in continuing their clandestine teddy bear delivery service.

 

tcPp1OK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Everyone knows that nuclear-propelled spacecraft are the only true spacecraft, as machines that are powered by sissy chemical reactions are girly toys that might as well be painted pink and stamped "Mattel" on the side.

 

So I crunched the numbers for the fuel fractions of all the liquid fuel only tanks in KSP:

 

Engine pre-cooler/radial air intake:  57%

Mk 1 Liquid Fuselage:  88.9%

Mk 2 Liquid Fuselage Short:  87.3%

Mk 2 Liquid Fuselage: 87.5%

Mk 3 Liquid Fuselage Short:  87.5%

Mk 3 Liquid Fuselage: 87.5%

Mk 3 Liquid Fuselage Long:  87.5%

NCS Adaptor:  80%

FAT 455 Aeroplane Main Wing:  79.3%

Big S Wing Strake:  83%

Big S Delta Wing:  75%

 

 

So it's pretty uniform, and basically the same as bipropellant rocket options.

 

The Mk 2 seems like a clear winner for atmospheric craft since it's also lift-generating.  The Mk 3 options don't really seem to have anything going for them.  The FAT 455 wing, strake and delta are potentially good options for atmospheric craft because, if the wiki is to be believed, they have lower drag coefficients than the fuselage sections!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main advantage of the Mk 3 parts is in the construction of large, stable ships that don't bog down your computer or suffer random kraken attacks from high parts count vessels coming out of time warp. Less floating point errors is a good thing.

 

 

Sunrise on Eeloo

dZAdtWL.jpg

 

Mobile outpost being delivered to Duna

73xCqiz.jpgaD0iHwe.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...