Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Weapons Promotional Videos


Recommended Posts

 

Old-timey arms marketing videos are a great source of mirth.  They're part time capsule, part content-free advertisement.

 

I'm roughly dating this video to the early Reagan era.  Operation Nimrod is mentioned and even a bit of footage from it is shown at 1:21.  If you want to sell submachine guns, some sort of embassy crisis which ends in an SF raid.  It worked for FN too.  Curiously, the new HK G41 5.56mm rifle, which was introduced in 1981, is not mentioned.

 

The description of the diopter sight as "easy to adjust" at 1:58 is debatable, but the idea that they're as easy to use as a scope is laughable.  The comparison of the HK 91 against a bolt action rifle at 2:36 seems risible too, but remember that this was the 1980s.  Most police unit snipers would still have been using bolt action rifles.  Assuming that the police units had snipers at all.

 

The demonstration at 3:20 is rather strange; supposedly the scope mount (which rather reminds me of the Warsaw Pact SVD scope mounts, incidentally) can hold zero if removed and re-attached.  Why are they putting it on another rifle?  Are we to believe that HK rifles are produced with such uncompromising precision that all of their rifles have the same point of impact relative to their scope mounts!?  I'm guessing that either this was supposed to show the cross-compatible nature of the scope mounts on HKs (if you'd ever wondered what those little square wrinkle things in the top of the receiver were, now you know), and they didn't realize how strange this seemed.  Because in the 1980s, putting a scope on a rifle wasn't a prerequisite like it is today.

 

3:40 is where the really funny claims start.  Apparently the roller locking system of the G3 allows it to defy the conservation of momentum!  Actually, G3s, compared to other 7.62 NATO self-loaders, have a rather violent recoil impulse that is the direct result of their very high bolt carrier velocity.  When Sturgeon and I high-speed video-d an HK 21 (essentially the same weapon, but belt-fed), we clocked the bolt carrier going about twice as fast as the bolt carrier group of an AR-15.  In fact, one of the many changes that either HK or CETME made to the relatively simple STG-45 design early in the development of the G3 was the addition of a counter-wrapped spring buffer in the stock to keep the bolt carrier from battering the receiver.  Later, this was supplemented with a granulated tungsten buffer inside the bolt carrier.

 

4:15 starts the obligatory dirt test.  Note that in these videos, whenever the weapon is immersed in crud, this is invariably done with the ejection port facing down.  HK roller rifles are not particularly more resistant to debris ingress than other well-designed military rifles.  Getting enough crud inside the works will stop them, same as anything else.  In fact, HK resisted putting last-round hold opens on their weapons for just this reason (yes, it's a public forum.  However, G3Kurz worked for HK for years, so when it comes to HKs, he knows whereof he speaks).

 

The sequence starting at 6:54 is hilarious.  You've got your slow, deliberate manipulation of the weapon components (a trope sadly lost in recent years from such videos), you've got your porno music, and you've got your porno 'stache.  Yes, indeed, the HK-94 is adaptable to any situation.  Even explosive ones!

 

We are then treated to a talk about the P7 pistol, then HK's flagship model.  They... slightly simplify the history of the gas-retarded blowback system, HK did not invent that.  However, they did invent the cocking system so far as I know, and from the times I've shot it, it seems a good system.  You know, if it weren't so hideously complex:

4027607031_7f3a5da821_b.jpg

 

And finally, a historical curiosity, there was a period when HK was the importer for the Benelli super 90.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The demonstration at 3:20 is rather strange; supposedly the scope mount (which rather reminds me of the Warsaw Pact SVD scope mounts, incidentally) can hold zero if removed and re-attached.  Why are they putting it on another rifle?  Are we to believe that HK rifles are produced with such uncompromising precision that all of their rifles have the same point of impact relative to their scope mounts!?  I'm guessing that either this was supposed to show the cross-compatible nature of the scope mounts on HKs (if you'd ever wondered what those little square wrinkle things in the top of the receiver were, now you know), and they didn't realize how strange this seemed.  Because in the 1980s, putting a scope on a rifle wasn't a prerequisite like it is today.

 

The French MAS 49/56 can swap sights and have the sights close to the money - at least at closer range (precision 400m plus then you are correct, the chance of the two weapons firing 10 ring is laughable).  For years the ability of all French rifles to carry as scope was seen as a disadvantage of other rifles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's already begun...

 

 

RULE 3 GODDAMNIT, RULE 3!

 

Calicos are lovably strange little carbines.  They are roller-retarded blowback, with the bolt carrier group being a simplified version of the HK design (the fluted chamber and anti-rebound claw are omitted).  This means that calicos are about twice as complex as they need to be, while MP-5s are about three times too complicated.

 

The placement of the magazine on top of the weapon meant that, bizarrely, the rear sight was attached to the magazine.  It is remarkable that the design team could come up with the helical magazine, but not a better place to put the sights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

This is fucking magical:

 

 

Meplat, you should fortify yourself with alcohol before watching this, otherwise I cannot be held responsible to any damage you inflict to your computer monitor or walls by throwing things at them.

I'm Canadian, and we're generally considered to be overly trusting folks here. 

 

Yeah. NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is fucking magical:

 

 

Meplat, you should fortify yourself with alcohol before watching this, otherwise I cannot be held responsible to any damage you inflict to your computer monitor or walls by throwing things at them.

 

But I'd to see Meplat knock someone out with a thrown toolbox!

 

Can he do that while drunk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Promotional video for the F-16A, featuring the first generation MFD.

 

And for it's potential competitor, the F-20 Tigershark, starring Chuck Yeager.

 

Grumman promotional film for Iranian F-14s. "To her south, the Persian Gulf. These warm waters Russia has coveted since the days of the Tsar."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45XKU12y4lM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard from people who shot it that the G11 was a handful in burst mode.  In semi though, not so bad.

 

In burst mode the entire receiver and magazine recoil within the housing.  All three shots are fired before the receiver bottoms out, so the point of aim is not spoiled by recoil and the three rounds of the burst cluster around the point of aim (instead of stringing vertically like they do in conventional rifles).

 

The downside of that is that the momentum doesn't go away, it just adds up until the receiver bottoms out within the housing.  Then all the momentum from all three shots of the burst hit the shooter at once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard from people who shot it that the G11 was a handful in burst mode.  In semi though, not so bad.

 

In burst mode the entire receiver and magazine recoil within the housing.  All three shots are fired before the receiver bottoms out, so the point of aim is not spoiled by recoil and the three rounds of the burst cluster around the point of aim (instead of stringing vertically like they do in conventional rifles).

 

The downside of that is that the momentum doesn't go away, it just adds up until the receiver bottoms out within the housing.  Then all the momentum from all three shots of the burst hit the shooter at once.

   Same with AN-94, recoil from 2 shots kich you just after second bullet leaves barrel. "Fck your shoulders!"-recoil rifles. They are not very comfortable, and burst modes on those 2 is not worth of trouble.

 

   Will such types of small arms be ever needed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Same with AN-94, recoil from 2 shots kich you just after second bullet leaves barrel. "Fck your shoulders!"-recoil rifles. They are not very comfortable, and burst modes on those 2 is not worth of trouble.

 

   Will such types of small arms be ever needed?

 

The selling point always seems to be either for defeating body armor by striking (near) the same place multiple times and/or trying to make a shotgun as accurate as a rifle so that you can increase "kill probability" by putting more lead in the air so that the target is more likely to be hit or to take a vital hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The selling point always seems to be either for defeating body armor by striking (near) the same place multiple times and/or trying to make a shotgun as accurate as a rifle so that you can increase "kill probability" by putting more lead in the air so that the target is more likely to be hit or to take a vital hit.

 

Pretty much, if anyone is taking the time to put accurate (like within one body part at 400 meters) type shots with a Ak-74, just hand him one of these

 

That way he can pop specific targets like a DMR but wont be cuckholded once the fight gets all sporty and close 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By Beer
      I haven't found an appropriate thread where to put some interesting rare stuff related to WW2 development, be it industrial one or makeshift field modifications. 
       
      Let's start with two things. The first one is a relatively recently found rarity from Swedish archives - a drawing of ČKD/BMM V8H-Sv tank. The drawing and a letter was found by WoT enthusiasts in Swedish archives in 2014 (the original announcement and the drawing source is here). The drawing is from a message dated 8th September 1941. One of the reasons why this drawing was not known before may be that the Czech archives were partially destroyed by floods in 2002. Anyway it is an export modification of the V-8-H tank accepted into Czechoslovak service as ST vz.39 but never produced due to the cancelation of all orders after Münich 1938 (for the same reason negotiations about licence production in Britain failed). Also later attempt to sell the tank to Romania failed due to BMM being fully busy with Wehrmacht priority orders. The negotiations with Sweden about licence production of V8H-Sv lasted till 1942, at least in May 1942 Swedish commission was present in Prague for negotiations. The tank differed compared to the base ST vz.39 in thicker armor with different front hull shape (armor 60 mm @ 30° on the hull front and also 60 mm on the turret; all sides were 40 mm thick). The tank was heavier (20 tons) and had the LT vz.38 style suspension with probably even larger wheels. The engine was still the same Praga NR V8 (240-250 Hp per source). The armament was unchanged with 47 mm Škoda A11 gun and two vz.37 HMG. The commander's cupola was of the simple small rotating type similar to those used on AH-IV-Sv tankettes. It is known that the Swedes officially asked to arm the tank with 75 mm gun, replace the engine with Volvo V12 and adding third HMG to the back of the turret. In the end the Swedes decided to prefer their own Strv/m42. 

      Source of the drawing
       
      The second is makeshift field modification found on Balkans. It appears Ustasha forces (and possibly some SS anti-partizan units) used several Italian M15/42 medium tanks with turrets from Pz.38(t). There are several photos of such hybrids but little more is known. On one photo it is possible to see Ustasha registration number U.O. 139.

      Few more photos of such hybrid.
       
      It appears that the source of all those photos to be found on the internet is this book, Armoured units of the Axis forces in southeastern Europe in WW2 by Dinko Predoevic. 
       
    • By pizza654
      Hi as most of you know who are in the gun community a bunch of AR 70/90 kits came into the country and theirs still no barrels or receivers in production. Since I cant find anything I decided that I'm just going to make my own barrel and I've found the measurements from a guy on reddit who lives in Italy. 
       
      https://imgur.com/gallery/WUtxuAP
       
      https://imgur.com/gallery/1ydhDUS
       
      As I was getting the measurements a curiosity ran through my head, how do you mathematically figure out the proper diameter of the gas port hole for the gas block in the barrel?
       
      Much help will be appreciated! 
       
       
    • By Curly_
      This came up in a recent discussion I had with a friend over Discord, concerning a hypothetical near-peer conflict (particularly in an urban environment). My friend is of the belief that in such a conflict there isn't no reason to field any small arms (not just service rifles or light machine guns) in anything larger than something like 5.56 NATO, the rationale being that a.) you can carry more of it compared something like 6.5 Creedmoor or 7.62 NATO, b.) you're mostly going to be using it suppressing the enemy so that you can drop high explosives on their heads, and c.) since most combat takes place under 300 meters the extra range would be unnecessary. Is there any merit to this line of thinking? What cases can be made for using more powerful, longer ranged cartridges in SDMRs and (tripod or vehicle mounted) machine guns?
    • By Wiedzmin
      have question about 12.7x99 AP M2 cartridge  WWII time books gives muzzle velocity for AP M2 - 895 m/s for 45in barrel, modern days firing tables and manuals gives 856 m/s for 45in barrel, which is correct, or both correct but 1st for WWII and 2nd for modern dayes cartridges ?
×
×
  • Create New...