Sturgeon Posted June 2, 2015 Report Share Posted June 2, 2015 Probably, yes. I want to get one of these low serial guns and do a review of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meplat Posted June 2, 2015 Report Share Posted June 2, 2015 You're probably going to be firing ammo of a quality and consistency that was a pipe dream when those accidents were occurring. Also, there were an awful lot of sub 800K/300K guns that were perfectly safe. Sturgeon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khand-e Posted June 2, 2015 Report Share Posted June 2, 2015 Is it safe to shoot a .24 caliber projectile with a massive powder charge out of a rifle designed to fire a .22 caliber projectile with a massive powder charge? Sturgeon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hummer Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 There are people that shoot the low numbers but consider the fact that giving a good whack to the left or right side of a low number 03 has broken hunks out of it, (not chips but whole sections of side of receiver) for me it is a NO NO. There are published picks of these broken receivers in I think it is Hatcher's Notebook. Personally they would be a wall hanger for me including their bolts. The barrels from them may be useful but rechambering one for a Magnum round is very likely to give you a catastrophic failure. CIP back in early 50s PO ACKLEY was a instructor at Trinidad and he told his students never rechamber a gov't 1903 barrel for a magnum and one did. About the tenth round he fired it the barrel let go in the classic 3:00-9:00 failure mode and sheared four fingers on left hand. You can add to the P14 Enfields as those barrels are noted to start splitting at the muzzle working their way backwards. This is from all three vendors This is all discussed in declassified Brit ordnance publications. Somewhere I have a copy of that chapter supplied to me by a knowledgeable contact in Britain that had access to the documents in the Pattern Room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMerlon Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 Just a tidbit to think about when it comes to 1903 safety. Supposedly the earlier m1903s only have a single small gas port on the right hand of the receiver, whereas later versions also have a larger gas port on the left side. Apparently even with that, the gas sealing on the 1903 isn't too great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hummer Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 GMerlon is correct but if you happen to experience a soft head failure the entire rifle is probably going to be wrecked and you are heading to the ER or undertaker. Example of a soft head failure I investigated. This happened on the sixth round in a M1 Garand. I was contacted and told him to send me all the fired cases prior to it and he did. Headspace was perfect on the first 5 and no 6 completely wrecked the Garand. This round was loaded in Britain for the Greek Army in the 50s and found out this arsenal had these prior. The bolt lugs held, the receiver held but the escaping gas broke the lower stock in about 5 pieces. Soft heads occur when the cases go through the annealing line upside down and the flames are directed at the head of the case instead of the neck/shoulder and is one of the bad things that can happen on a manual loading line thus if you ever see a round of military ammo where the head is blue and the other ammo the neck/shoulder is blue this is your warning do not fire it under any circumstances. This was known to occur on 5.56 ammo loaded on manual lines at LC, TW etc and we got a M16 in that had sustained a case failure about every four months when I worked in the Product Engineering section for the Army Small Cal Lab at Picatinny Arsenal. The upper receiver is bowed outwards and is ruined. We never had a case of lug faillure on the bolt or barrel socket. It was estimated that this occurred once every 30 million rounds.. Collimatrix, N-L-M and Sturgeon 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted December 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2019 On 12/16/2019 at 5:31 AM, Hummer said: GMerlon is correct but if you happen to experience a soft head failure the entire rifle is probably going to be wrecked and you are heading to the ER or undertaker. Example of a soft head failure I investigated. This happened on the sixth round in a M1 Garand. I was contacted and told him to send me all the fired cases prior to it and he did. Headspace was perfect on the first 5 and no 6 completely wrecked the Garand. This round was loaded in Britain for the Greek Army in the 50s and found out this arsenal had these prior. The bolt lugs held, the receiver held but the escaping gas broke the lower stock in about 5 pieces. Soft heads occur when the cases go through the annealing line upside down and the flames are directed at the head of the case instead of the neck/shoulder and is one of the bad things that can happen on a manual loading line thus if you ever see a round of military ammo where the head is blue and the other ammo the neck/shoulder is blue this is your warning do not fire it under any circumstances. This was known to occur on 5.56 ammo loaded on manual lines at LC, TW etc and we got a M16 in that had sustained a case failure about every four months when I worked in the Product Engineering section for the Army Small Cal Lab at Picatinny Arsenal. The upper receiver is bowed outwards and is ruined. We never had a case of lug faillure on the bolt or barrel socket. It was estimated that this occurred once every 30 million rounds.. Ooo, good info, thank you for posting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.