Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Proper, god-fearing Soviet tanks use four-stroke diesel engines.  When the tank is cruising, the engine should be happy and produce very little smoke.  But when the engine is suddenly changing RPM, th

BM "Oplot"     Ukrainian designers managed to make biggest panoramic sight i ever saw - overall weight of it is reaching 500 kg.            Oplot-M, or BM "Oplot" after addoption to service i

Undisputable evidence of Russian aggression against the Mighty and Unified Independent State of Ukraine! Behold these vehicles personally blessed by Ramzan Kadyrov when issued to GRU GSh FSB GIBDD spe

http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2397624.html

What Kharkov tank repair factory had in its storage area before conflict started in 2014.

 

At moment before 2014, Kharkov BTRZ had:

T-64 tanks of various modifications ≈ 230;
T-72 tanks of various modifications ≈ 140;
T-80 tanks of various modifications ≈ 80.

 

Storage area:

1642_900.png

 

T-72s:

Around 80-90 tanks in this part.

1907_900.jpg

 

~30 tanks in that part:

2375_900.jpg

 

Around 20 T-72s here:

2607_900.jpg

 

Up to 150 T-72s

 

T-80s:

about 50 T-80s:

2946_900.jpg

 

Additional 30 T-80s in that triangle part:

3310_900.jpg

 

around 80 T-0s in total.

 

T-64s:

Up to 118 T-64s:

3542_900.jpg

 

up to 50 T-64s:

5069_900.jpg

 

and at least 60 T-64s in those 2 areas:

4010_900.jpg

Up to 230 T-64s

 

Difference between 2014 and 2016:

4645_900.jpg

 

Up to 140 T-72s, majority of T-80s (60) are no longer present in storage area. Difference in T-64 numbers is not big - around 20-30 vehicles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBTZ will probably stop production of Dozor-B light armored car because factory don't have money to buy parts and even pay all salaries. LBTZ didn't payed 2.15 mil hrivans to Kharkov Tractor factory for some of Dozor-B parts, for example.

dozor-b_001l.jpg

Source - Main Kharkovite and here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ukrainian package delivery company (Novaya Pochta) storage area for some reason have 2 BM-7 Parus RCWS for BTR-4s. The caption to the photo states that the sender  is Zhytomyr Armored vehicle factory, and the recipient - Kharkiv Machine Building Design Bureau named after Morozov.

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/papagdepylo/24480835/515334/515334_600.jpg

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/papagdepylo/24480835/515586/515586_600.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
On 03.11.2016 at 11:34 AM, LoooSeR said:

It looks like rumors about Oplot not having composite/layered armor in its UFP are true.

1cdedbd9c6de.jpg

UFP armor module is duplet ERA blocks and steelplate between them.

 

2ccb9c09f192.jpg

 

Other pics:

  Reveal hidden contents

da21ee357397.jpg

 

dc2a7ccf2cf6.jpg

 

Duplet side armor modules parts:

a5547ed4087c.jpg

 

Side armor plates:

87b686f1a8fb.jpg

 

340076628fa8.jpg

 

 

 

Turret:

6bb62d6432f6.jpg

 

 

Yes it's true - it's just rumors

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting post on Tanknet about a VK group discussing the pros and cons of various tanks in the Ukraine conflict:

 

Quote

1) Starting the 5TDF engine in winter under normal conditions (presence of compressed air) does not constitute a major difficulty. The engine heater is run for 5 minutes.

 

2) The FCS 1A33 "Ob" used in T-64B/BV shows more than satisfactory accuracy. In terms of accuracy and ease of use it far exceeds the 1A40 used in T-72B. Kurt does not consider T-72B a proper tank because 1A40 is obsolete.

 

3) T-72B has better performance than T-64BV (accelerates faster etc) but is worst in terms of flotability and mobility in mud. This is a known issue in T-72, and is related to the track design. On the other hand it had the best mobility in rocky and sandy soils. The issue was solved in T-72BA, which received a new track.

 

4) The fastening of the Kontakt-1 ERA screens in the sides does not last longer than a week in both vehicles in conditions of intensive use. In the T-72 the screens are a bit more resistant but the tear offs are easier to replace in the T-64BV.

 

5) The remote firing machine gun is a big advantage (despite the Kharkov construction deficiencies), as in a normal setup no one wants to get exposed to enemy bullets to fire the machine gun.

 

6) 28 shells in the autoloader are enough for combat

 

7) With proper maintenance the reliability of the T-64BV is not inferior to the T-72B. The issues of T-64BV reliability were associated with the terrible condition in which the tanks are coming from factories “I picked up a couple of tanks in storage. The first impression is like a swallow, but inside is just scrap; half of the equipment is rotten. The piping requires many repairs. "забирал с консервации пару машин,вся вікрашена как с музея,на вид просто ласточка,а внутри просто жесть,половина деталей тупо сгнило,ремонта много требует,все патрубки перегнили от солярі и к воздуху просто пустота.

 

The reliability of both chassis was satisfactory.

 

8) The weak point of T-64 is the cooling system of the engine. The operating temperature is 105°C. At 110°C it overheats. At 115-117°C it chokes and engine liner twists (это клин, выворачивает вкладыши).

 

During this summer, the crews were forced to turn on the heating inside the fighting compartment, as this opens a flap connected to the engine compartment, diverting some of the heat. The tank then becomes a mobile sauna. Crews almost strip to the underwear but still sweat and sweat. This has been confirmed. There is no problem in the T-72.

 

9) T-64B had good serviceability, which was especially useful given the deplorable state of vehicles in storage areas of Ukrainian Armed Forces. Crews were able to solve most of the problems in the field (no discussion on this issue took place).

 

In general, both tankers had a positive impression of T-64, Kurt preferred the T-64 over T-72

A little more detail on the condition of Ukrainian Army tanks:

 

Due to the poor quality repairs the night sights in the majority of them did not work. If one out of 10 did work we were lucky. A night battle can only be conducted using flares and other illumination techniques.

The loading mechanism “chewed” the projectile sleeves due to problems with the oil.

The engine repairs failed almost every day. There were a lot of problems with the geabox. All this aggravates the problems mentioned in point 8. “в обороне жить можно,в наступлении плохо,пока доедим сто раз перегрееться или масле со всех дыр 

 

And a couple of words about other stuff - additional fuel tanks are not used, external in the B / D (sides?) are not filled.

 

https://vk.com/oldfag_tm

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

   It appears that Otoman 8x8 designed by "Praktika" is just BTR-60 with changes in upper hull and new engine, at least claimed by BMPD and "Jane's International Defense Review" in the article by Huw Williams "Practika details Otaman upgrade".

Отам

 

Quote

   "Otaman 8x8" keeps the chassis and floor of the BTR-60, but is equipped with a new armored hull and a new power plant. The new steel armored hull should have a ballistic protection standard of STANAG 4569 level II. The floor is reinforced with an additional layer of protection. Iveco diesel engine 238 hp. (Torque 1020 Nm) is located in the front right, the transmission is hydromechanical. Amphibian capabilities are preserved.

   NPO Practica offers the creation of a whole range of armored vehicles on the basis of Otaman 8x8, including various combat modules and turrets with 90-mm or 105-mm cannons. "Working model" of "Otaman 8x8", apparently, will be equipped with the combat module BM-3 "Storm" with a 30-mm cannon ZTM-1.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

About a week ago Kozak-2 was accepted to service in UAF.

get?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsprotyv.info%2Fsites%2Fsprotyv%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fbig%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2017%2F17504687_1146377702156720_8425764296234949698_o.jpg%3Fitok%3Dzka1WXgq&key=aTJswWAnf4K7sI_y-rYNLA&w=800&h=488

 

Quote

   In fact, this is the first car of this class, adopted by the Ukrainian army in the history of the state's independence. And what is especially telling is that the new armored car was developed and serially produced in a private enterprise - at the Kiev NGO "Praktika", which is part of the League of Defense Enterprises of Ukraine.

Dozor-B is still not accepted to service.

 

get?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsprotyv.info%2Fsites%2Fsprotyv%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fbig%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2017%2F17545198_1146377735490050_1820287458890361486_o.jpg%3Fitok%3DdfbFcrNc&key=xTlBREteVygNVTVF1JT0qQ&w=800&h=488

 



KDlk2uFwTbc.jpg

 

ebeIb34gzJ0.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Monochromelody
      The Al Khalid derived from Norinco Type 90IIM MBT. It was in the early 90s, when India started to test their Arjun MBT. Pakistanis looked for a MBT design that could be produced by herself. 
      Norinco provided their own Type 90IIM prototype, this is an MBT design which comprised many Western components, such as engine and transmission. 

      There were 4 prototypes for Al-Khalid development, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. 
      P1 has a Chinese tank diesel engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission. 
      P2 has a British Perkins CV12 Condor diesel engine with French SESM ESM500 transmission. 
      P3 has a Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 2-cycle boxer engine with its own twin planetary gearbox. 
      P4 has a German MB871 engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission, similar to South Korean K1 MBT. 

      Norinco and Pakistanis planned to adopt one of the Western powerpack at first, but due to CoCom (Coordinating Committee for Export to Communist Countries) restrictions, China is under embargo, which means China would not import weapons form Western countries. Obviously P3 powerplant would be the only choice. All those descriptions on the internet about ESM500 in Al-Khalid is fatally wrong. 
       
      The Al-Khalid pre-production batch and production version all equipped with Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 powerpack.
      It is an extremely compact design, the engine laid transversely in engine room, twin planetary gearboxes connect to both left and right end. The 6TD-2 has two crankshafts: the front one drives the mechanical supercharger, while the rear one drives the gearboxes. The cooling system covering the whole engine room, the engine itself has no mechanical connection to the cooling system, and the cooling system doesn't need mechanical drive. The cooling system based on a unique principle: exhaust gas driven ejector. The exhaust gas from the engine is injected through the outlet ducting, produce a low pressure in the outlet side, that will suck in cold air from the inlet side. This principle is also used in the T-64, T-80UD and T-84, but as far as I know, Swedish Ikv 91 is the only western tank that have similar cooling principle. 
       
      As a result, the total length of powerpack is significantly shortened, much more shorter than the European powerpack mentioned above. This leads to a spare storage room between the fighting compartment and the engine compartment. This storage is for extra ammunition and fuel, when turret points 3 or 9 o'clock, the top cover of the storage could be opened from outside, containing 10 rounds for main gun, with projectiles on the outsides, semi-combustible charges on the inside.
      The data table from HIT also describe the ammunition capacity as 39+10, means that 22 ready rounds in the T-72 type carousel autoloader, 17 backup rounds scatter around the fighting compartment, and extra 10 rounds could be carried in the storage room. 
       
      The driver of Al-Khalid control the vehicle via steering wheel and an automatic gear control box. The steering wheel and gear control box send electrical signals to the computer, then computer control the hydraulic servo actuator to perform engage and disengage of brakes and clutches, making steering and gear changes, as well as adjusting the speed and torque of the engine.
       
      Mechanically the gearboxes are nearly the same as T-64s and T-72s, but have different side reducer unit. The KMDB side reducer unit is designed as a secondary gearbox, acting like a forward-reverse selector. When both reducers were put into reverse, the vehicle can reverse using the normal forward ranges. From 1st gear to 4th gear, all could be used as high speed reverse, and that's why KMDB said this is a 7F4R gearbox system. And if only one reducer was put into reverse, the track will be driving in opposites direction, causing the vehicle turns within its tracks, a.k.a. pivot steer or center steer. T-84 also applied this driving and steering system.  
       
      The advantages of Al-Khalid's powerpack is the versatility: all 3 types of MBT in the Pakistanis arsenal, T-80UD, T-84, Al-Khalid, share the same engine and gearbox. 
    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By delfosisyu
      Hey guys. This is my first post in this forum.
       
       
       
      I want to find out sources for 2 information.
       
       
       
       
      Firstly, a friend of mine told me about the accuracy of T-80B tested in 1980s.
       
       
       
       
       
      T-80B      1000m   1500m     2000m
                      
                      87%       66%       46%
       
       
       
       
       
      I asked him where he found this data. But he told me he forgot where he did find this since too much time passed from that moment.
       
       
       
       
       
       
      The Second one is about Russian ballistic computer's range-finding rate.
       
       
      One day, one of my friends who speaks russian quite well showed me a product info. of russian(maybe ukrainian) gunner's primary sight.
       
       
      It was written that range-finding rate of the sight after laser fired-off 0.3~3.0 seconds. 
       
       
      I totally forgot the address of that product brochure.
       
       
       
      I'd be very appreciated if you help me finding links of these information.
    • By Walter_Sobchak
      I realized that we don't actually have a thread about the British Chieftain tank.  
       
      I posted a bunch of Chieftain related stuff on my site today for anyone who is interested.  The items include:
       
      Magazine Articles
       
      1970 article from ARMOR
      1970 article from IDR  - Chieftain-Main Battle tank for the 1970s
      1976 article from IDR - The Combat-Improved Chieftain – First Impressions
      1976 article from IDR - Improved Chieftain for Iran
       
      Government reports
       
      WO 194-495 Assessment of Weapon System in Chieftain
      WO 341-108 Automotive Branch Report on Chieftain Modifications
      DEFE 15-1183 – L11 Brochure 
      WO 194-463 – Demonstration of Chieftain Gun 
       
      WO 194-1323 – Feasibility study on Burlington Chieftain

×
×
  • Create New...