LostCosmonaut Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 For those of you who are not familiar with him, Robert Zubrin is an American aerospace engineer and author of some note. He is probably best known for his advocacy of the 'Mars Direct' proposal, although he's also done quite a bit of work in the nuclear spacecraft propulsion field (he's the guy that came up with the NSWR). His wiki page says he's also written on other vaguely political topics, but I'm not familiar with them. Personally, I find his work on spacecraft propulsion highly interesting, and it's good that we've got somebody putting forth cogent ideas for space exploration. However, I feel that some of his ideas are a bit too optimistic, especially in regards to his Mars Direct approach. I feel that it would be more optimal to gain more experience with long term off-planet living in a location such as the moon before proceeding to Mars, while also using that time to mature techniques such as nuclear rockets to actually get to Mars. On a related note, I showed his NSWR paper to a guy I know who has some not insignificant knowledge of nuclear physics, and he was a bit skeptical. Still, in my opinion, it's infinitely better to have somebody be a bit overoptimistic about how well their ideas will work, and keeps push them forward, then a bunch of limp wristed pessimists who are afraid to send anyone beyond LEO because it might cost a few million dollars. Sturgeon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Direct is basically what we have now, only SLS is worse in some ways. So basically, he got what he wanted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zinegata Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 My friends who are more inclined to delve into details of rocketry generally consider Zubrin to be insane, but I must admit greatly liking the idea of a propulsion system whose principle revolves around containing a nuclear explosion within a shielded vessel and spurting the resulting energized propellant out of the rocket's ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.