Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

General cars and vehicles thread.


Recommended Posts

   Polish light truck FSO Polonez Pick-up trzyosiowy




   A three-axle pickup truck based on the FSO Polonez pickup truck was created in 1981 at the Household and Tourist Equipment Workshop in the town of Niewiadowo. The chassis of the FSO Polonez passenger car was used as a basis, which was extended and an additional axle was added, due to which the carrying capacity of the pickup truck reached 900 kg (for FSO Polonez biaxial pickups, the payload was 540 kg.). On the three-horn pickup used a standard 1.5-liter engine producing 82 hp A total of 3 cars were made.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/14/2019 at 3:03 PM, LoooSeR said:

   Polish light truck FSO Polonez Pick-up trzyosiowy






The problem with light vehicles of this configuration, is the tendency to chew up rear tires. They often have a small enough turning radius to where the rear tires are scrubbed badly in turns.  Unlike a "normal" configuration, where the radius extends through the rear axle, here the radius extends through the centerline between the two axles.


With heavier vehicles, the radius is large enough it's not as big an issue (it still happens, just not as badly).


This likely being a FWD vehicle, it may have had a large enough turning radius to minimize the scrubbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   BMW new concept car - BMW Vision M Next


/.../a hybrid with a front mounted electric motor and a gasoline 4-cylinder turbocharged engine at the rear. The maximum output is 600 hp, so the maximum speed is an impressive 300 km/h and acceleration to the "hundred" takes only 3 seconds.




























Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Barinov is doing his thing, again. And i like it. :D 

   This time - GAZ-12 ZIM "Hyperliner"


   Russian designer Sergey Barinov, known for his projects on the revival of the Soviet autoclassics, has completed work on a new noticeable project


“The project is partially styled as a classic GAZ-12. But this is not a rough copy! It used elements of vintage American cars from 50-60. For example, a panoramic windshield or aft form - the original ZIM doesn’t have this whole thing. But at the same time there are modern elements, like hidden door handles. ”
















































   And another one.


Designer Sergey Barinov rethought another Soviet car, creating a modern version of the ZIS-110 limousine


   I went a little wild with my remakes. To the extent that I already do remakes on my remakes! In general, the essence of this car is a training [for me], it will not be brought to the final, only a new image [looks] was tested on it






































Link to comment
Share on other sites

   French Delahaye 175S Saoutchik Roadster




   This roadster was created in 1949 in the workshop of Yakov Savchik based on the Delahaye 175 sport car. The car was equipped with a 165 hp engine and a Cotal four-speed manual gearbox.
   In 1949, the Delahaye 175S Saoutchik was sold to Sir John Gol, who in the period 1949-1950. demonstrated it at a number of automotive exhibitions. In the future, the car became the property of the movie star Diana Dors, and later - was in the collections of Arthur Rippi and William G. Parfet.











Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2019 at 6:53 AM, LoooSeR said:

   French Delahaye 175S Saoutchik Roadster




  Hide contents









So much of what could have been good, just went pear-shaped here.

Some really great features, but then the ..Forehead, just fucks it.  Rake that shit back, marry the lines of the fenders.

And the power.  Drop a Caddy V8 in there, dual carbs, McCullogh blower, big Hydromatic.  Give it some shove to go with the looks.


The dash is prewar. No comment. Looks fine in  Dodge WC, but underwhelming here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


   GAZ Group will soon launch the release of the successor to GAZ-66

   Gorky Automobile Plant issued certification documents for the Sadko-Next utility off-road vehicle, which received the C41A23 index. Registration of certification documents means that Sadko-Next’s products will soon enter the market. The new generation of “Sadko” could have appeared earlier, but the GAZ, given the niche character of the model, took a break, postponing the release of the novelty until 2019. Interest from foreign buyers accelerated progress.


   Off-road version differs from the “Gazon-Next” by a huge ground clearance, a single-sided busbar and different design of the front end - instead of the “Next” optics, the usual “Soviet” headlights appeared that are not afraid of water ingress.


   The load capacity of the new model is 3 tons - this is immediately a ton more than the previous GAZ-33088 Sadko could take on board. After revision, only bridges, wheels and frame were taken from model 33088, moreover, the “skeleton” of the truck became tougher due to the use of other steel and other innovations.


   So far there is a single modification of the novelty - with a 4-cylinder turbodiesel YMZ-534 with a volume of 4.4 liters (149 hp and 490 Nm). The gearbox is a manual, 5-speed gearbox, although work is currently being carried out on the adaptation of a domestic-made automatic gearbox.










   That truck was tested in Indonesia


Link to comment
Share on other sites

   British roadster Jowett Jupiter




   Two-seater Jowett Jupiter sport car was created in the late 40s by British car company Jowett Cars Ltd. from Idle, a suburb of Bradford, in collaboration with the British company English Racing Automobiles, as well as designer Robert Eberand von Eberhorst, who moved from Austria.
   Jowett Jupiter received a tubular steel frame, aluminum body. The Jupiter was fitted with a 4-cylinder boxer engine of 1,486 cc and 60 hp., 4-speed gearbox. The car developed a maximum speed of 140 km/h. The presentation of the car took place in 1949 at the rally in Monte Carlo, where the car was the winner in its class. After racing in Monte Carlo, the car was also presented at automobile shows in London (September 1949), Geneva (March 1950) and New York (April 1950), where Jupiter aroused the interest of the public.
   Jupiter serial production was organized in 1950 and lasted until 1954. In total, about 900 Jupiter were made, of which 75 were transferred to various studios to create original coupes and convertibles.















Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/21/2019 at 9:49 AM, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:

Image result for offroad miata


I would 100% daily this thing. 


I want an offroad fast car now.

Find an old Z car. 240/260/280. Not a ZX or 300.

MUCH better.  I had a 76 280Z with BFG's, and open exhaust, it was a fucking monster on fire roads in Northern Michigan. 

Early280's also were running actual Bosh L-Jetronic, so you could monkey with it a lot.


Miatas, well, if you're as tall as I am youll get a fucking crick in your neck. It's like wearing a ballcap with the bill pulled down too far.  A Z you have miles of room, and a big windshield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Japanese experimental Toyota EX7 sport car




   The Toyota EX7 was created on the basis of the Toyota 7 racing car. Like the base model, the EX7 was equipped with a 5-liter 8-cylinder engine, but it was not equipped with turbochargers, which led to a decrease in power from 700 to 450 hp. The car was presented at the Tokyo Motor Show in 1970











Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

   "Recalled Mercedes-Benz vehicles are stored on old airfield"


Once again, the Daimler Group has to temporarily store thousands of new cars on the former airfield Ahlhorn. The reason is quality defects in heavy SUVs.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

   "The new Russian sedan will cost as two Maybachs. The price of the Aurus Senat Sedan with standard kit was named"




   During the opening of the first Aurus brand car dealership located in Moscow City, the price of the Aurus Senat S600 sedan was announced: in the basic configuration, a novelty of the domestic auto industry will cost 18 million rubles.
   For comparison, the all-wheel drive 367-horsepower Mercedes-Maybach S 450 4Matic can be purchased for 9,560,000. The Bentley Flying Spur V8 sedan also costs less than the Aurus - they ask for it from 12 million rubles.
   The Minister of Industry Denis Manturov, who was present at the opening of the dealership, once again confirmed that no more than 200 cars will be produced in 2020. Some of them will be sent to the government garage, others will go on free sale.


the Aurus Senat sedan (the former Cortege project) is a completely Russian development, however, the German company Porsche Engineering Group acted as a partner. At first, only NAMI will be engaged in the production of cars, for which purpose a modern automobile plant was built on the territory of the institute. The cars are equipped with a hybrid power plant, consisting of a powerful Russian-made V8 and electric motor, and all-wheel drive.

   kek, what is this, a fraud sedan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Ferrari 330 GT Shooting Brake (Vignale)




   A 4-seater sports car with a "Shooting Brake" body was created in 1968 by the Italian studio Vignale. The work was commissioned by Luigi Kinetti, a former Italian racer, who had by then become a dealer of Ferrari products in the United States. When creating this car, the chassis of the Ferrari 330 GT, which belonged to Kinetti and was damaged in the road accident, was used. During creation, the Vignale left the chassis unchanged. Only one car of this type was made and presented at the Turin Motor Show in 1968.















Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Proyas
      Is there any way Sherman tanks could be upgraded at reasonable cost to still have a role on the battlefield? Assume that your military will never fight with a world-class army (U.S., Russia, China, etc.) and instead will only fight with second-rate armies using 1990s technology at best, or with terrorists, or go on peacekeeping missions. 
      I'm thinking that the Shermans could have their turrets removed and modern autoloading turrets from other armored vehicles--like the 105mm Stryker gun, or the 40mm autocannon from the CV10, or the 30mm from the BMP-2 (would any of these fit in the Sherman's turret ring?)--could be dropped in, along with their sensors and computers. ATGM launchers could be installed as well. Explosive reactive armor bricks could be attached to the outside, as is common among modern Russian tanks. 
      Assume that your Sherman fleet is 1,000 tanks, in various states of (dis)repair, so you have enough spare parts to last for many years. 
      What do you guys think? Thanks. 
    • By Khand-e
      So, basic introduction, to start off, we'll go with the latest backbone of the PLA Ground forces' Armored divisions, the ZTZ-96 G/A
      Basic specs.
      Crew: 3
      Weight: 42-45 tonnes depending on equipment and addon armor/era.
      Power plant: 1,000 hp liquid cooled Diesel engine
      Speed: 65 km/h on roads 45 km/h off road
      Range: 400km without external tanks
      Armament: 125mm L/48 main gun with autoloader similar to the Soviet 2A46 (8 rounds per minute rof), ATGM capable, based on Russian Refleks-M missile, also has HEI-FRAG, HEAT, and APFSDS ammunition choices, W-85 12.7mm cupola machine gun (not pictured in this photo), 7.62mm coaxial machine gun.

      Wow, such sharp looking, very armor.
      Capability wise, this tank was recently pitted against some modern T-72B variants in a Russian tank Biathalon, and while it was deemed better in Armor, Armament, and Electronics, it lost out in mobility due to the underpowered engine, this killed all 730 and 780 hp engines in other ZTZ-96 G/As for the 1,000 hp engine.
      One interesting note: the boxes on the side actually contain equipment that interferes with the targetting systems of SACLOS missiles, aswell as laser designators, rangefinders and guidance systems, these can be seen when the tank is viewed from above.
      The heavier, far stronger pride of the ground forces.
      ZTZ-99 (A2 variant pictured.)
      Crew: 3
      Weight: 54-60 tonnes depending on variant
      Powerplant: 1,500 hp turbo charged liquid cooled diesel engine
      Speed: 80 km/h on roads, 60 km/h off road
      Range: 600km without external tanks.
      Armament: ZPT98 125mm L/52 autloaded gun with 8 rounds/minute rate of fire (some sources quote later variants at 11 rounds per minute), higher pressure tolerances, redesigned autoloader and other improvements, this allows it to fire improved ammunition such as far more deadly APFSDS then other 125mm autoloaded gun platforms in the PLA's inventory, it can still fire all other types of rounds aswell, W-85 12.7mm cupola machine gun, 7.62mm coaxial machine gun.
      Armor: While the exact thickness and composition isn't known, It's known from cutaway photos and some are pubically released information to have a hard spall liner as many other tanks these days, the actual armor composition itself are plates of high strength/toughness maraging steel sandwiching materials such as high hardness Aluminum oxides, aswell as layers of Graphene and unknown materials from there (likely something very dense), the boxes on the side of the turret and on the pike nose on the front are likely addon ceramic armor as opposed to ERA as originally believed and may be hollow to act as spaced armed, aside from the physical armor package, the tank also features ERA, NERA, and active defense systems that jam or alter the trajectory of various types of guided projectiles.

      So, this is the actual "elite" tank of the PLA to supplement the cheaper 96's, Originally it started out with a modest $2,500.000 production cost, however, as time grew on and they kept advancing it to the lastest standards of a top tier MBT, that sort of spiraled out of control a bit, coupled with the fact that the PLA ground forces don't get the same funding as the PLAAF and the PLAN, and the result was that, while the 99A2 has turned out to be a beast in it's own right, it simply isn't feasible price wise to give every tank crew a Type 99A2, however this is probably one of the most underrated 3rd generation MBTs as it's rarely talked about and theres a fuck ton of misinformation about it (mainly that it's a clone of the T-72/T-80 which is completely wrong) and well, it's goddamn pretty, and that counts for alot.
      Be sure to check my other topics covering other branches of the PLA
      http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/80-the-plan-present-and-future-or-the-rapid-modernization-of-the-chinese-navy-and-marines/- Regarding the Navy, Marines, and Weapons used by them and also land based anti ship defense systems.
      http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/71-the-future-of-pla-bullit-spitting-devices-powerful-chinese-weapons-and-units-thread/ - Regarding Infantry, small arms, and infantry support weapons.
      http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/87-the-plaaf-and-airborne-a-look-at-the-past-present-and-the-future/- Regarding the PLAAF Aircraft and weapon systems, helicopters, and the Airborne.
      A special thank you.
      I'd like to personally honor a few posters who have aided me and provided very solid data and posting in this thread, without them this thread and the other PLA related threads would be far less interesting. These should be the first people in here to ask about something.
      In no particular order.
      JimZhangZhang, Lightning, Akula_941, and U-47.
      And of course LoooSeR for keeping content in this thread when I wasn't able to.
    • By Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect
      Wherein I tackle the idea of hydrogen fuel cell technology in private vehicles.
      Buckle up.
      For the past few years, Hydrogen Fuelcell technology has been making the news in regards to personal transportation. Regardless of how long fuel cell technology has been used in the space industry, the media treated it like a futuristic Godsend for personal vehicles. I recall there being plans drawn up for refueling stations in California, even. But the Bear State is fond of making whatever promise they can to skim as much money from its people.
      See the High Speed rail fiasco.
      When I first heard of hydrogen fuel cells being used in vehicles, I was too young and immature to have much of an opinion. Back then, I was still cruising around downtown and hanging out with Sturgeon to care about motor vehicle trends. Those nights were spent talking trash about HK products, doing blow through rolled up Benjamins, and dozens of questionably legal Polynesian women.
      I'll be approaching this issue regards to efficiency, safety, production, and storage of many elements. We'll first discuss what hydrogen is.

      The Wiki gives a ton of great information. Most of you will know the basics. It's a gas at STP, contains a single valence electron in it's 1s shell (“shell” or cloud of probability derived by shrodinger's blah blah blah Physical Chemistry nonsense, don't make me do that derivation again). It was first artificially made by a guy named Cavendish, and is found naturally as a diatomic molecule.
      This diatomic molecule also really likes to explode if it gets near an energy source. H2 combustion is well documented, and releases 286 kJ/Mol.
      In fact, it can undergo combustion at as low as 4% concentration with air. That's low.
      Hydrogen's low molecular weight makes it the lightest gas around. This was capitalized during the second to last turn of the century, where mighty Zeppelins pushed through the sky like herds of giant sky manatees.

      Large enough to fit Colli-man's collection of miss-matched socks
      Germany loved these guys, and for a while they were all the rage in luxurious travel. Indeed, it was certainly the 20th century now! We had Airships, the Haber Process that was fueling an industrial revolution, and all of physics was completely solved! Thanks, Maxwell!
      (And then came the ultraviolet catastrophe, but that's another topic.)
      However, I mentioned above that hydrogen is extremely flammable at even very low concentrations within air. This fact really sunk the airship industry with a certain spectacular disaster.

      German Engineering, or Masonic Zion plot?
      It's easy to skip over this picture entirely. We've all seen it so many times (Unless you're one of my tutoring students, who look at me like I've got two heads when I mention it. “The hinda-what?”).
      But, this was the end of an era. Static charges ignited the hydrogen sacks that kept the big rigid frame afloat. And though we could have used Helium, a much more stable gas, the damage was done. No one would step foot near a rigid airship again.
      (Also our world's supply of Helium is finite and diminishing very very quickly. It would be wasted in airships. But again, another topic another time)
      Let's get back to the Hydrogen Fuelcell. What exactly is it, and how does it work?
      The basic model is shown below.

      This diagram is for a Proton Exchange Fuel Cell. The proton here is simply a hydrogen that's been stripped of its single electron. A fuel cell works by having very special membranes carefully constructed to permit the passage of a positively charged ion, but not the negatively charged electron. This travels through another path, leading to a voltage across the cell. This voltage can be used to power any electrical device.
      This is an oversimplification of how the device works, but it's a start.
      The benefits of such a device include the shear efficiency that it can have. When properly insulated and owing to proper low-resistance connections, these devices are pushing out efficiencies twice that of internal combustion engines. Which, despite what many places attempt to sell you, are actually quite thermodynamically efficient. These proton based fuel cells have great cold-start characteristics and energy density. Their outputs can actually be very high.
      Indeed, these fuel cells are efficient at all power outputs as well. Their efficiency does not vary with flow of fuel source either.
      Their temperatures can be as low as 80 degrees C. However, usually they are kept above 100 degrees C because steam is far more manageable than liquid water byproduct.
      So with all of this information, you're probably wondering why haven't we started putting these into all sorts of places. This post is about personal vehicles, however, and I'll get right back to that.
      No. I disagree completely with them being used in personal vehicles.
      While I love fuel cells as a power device, their use in personal vehicles is greatly limited. One of the biggest engineering hurdles is the flammability and storage of pure hydrogen. Since hydrogen has such a low molecular weight, to obtain a large enough amount to power a personal vehicle would require a very high pressure container. If you remember back to your Chemistry classes in high school, you may remember the Ideal Gas Equation. Hydrogen is pretty close to an Ideal Gas. As close as you'll get, really. The Ideal Gas Law, in actual use, is only about 84% accurate when used to guess thermodynamic systems. For hydrogen it's much higher.
      PV=nRT, where n is the number of moles. Keeping everything but Pressure and number of moles the same, to increase the number of moles directly increases the pressure. And H2, having a molecular weight of 2 Grams per Mole, would require a ton of moles to get a decent amount of the gas.
      A very high pressure container of pure hydrogen gas in a vehicle that routinely travels at 70 mph. Which is statistically guaranteed to be in an accident in its lifespan.
      The Germans are watching this and going “Nein Nein Nein!”
      According to this nifty search, over 3,000 people die per day in the US due to vehicular collisions. Ouch. 
      However, this issue is the first to be solved. The introduction of Metal Hydrides have solved the storage issues. Metal Hydrides act as chemical sponges for Hydrogen gas (H2), binding the molecules inside their chemical structure. These metal hydrides are usually used as powders, where the hydrogen is then pushed through to store. To release the hydrogen, the metal hydride must be heated. The rate of diffusion is directly related to the temperature at which the metal hydride is heated, and thus the fuel rate into the fuel cell can be varied by varying the temperature of the metal hydride.
      Metal hydrides can absorb 2 to 10% H2 usually, but better compounds are being produced to increase the number.
      This is good, because it gives us a safe way to store hydrogen gas for fuel cells.
      This is bad, because the fuel delivery rate is much lower, and metal hydride fuel cells are, at their very best, 1/4th as powerful as their PEM brothers. At worst, they are 1/50th.
      But this is the best we can do in a vehicle. No one wants pressurized hydrogen canisters on the highways. Hell, most of the time you need special clearance and big signs to transport the stuff. And imagine the safety concerns for the EMTs and Paramedics during a car crash. Even if the tank isn't ruptured, no EMT or Paramedic would risk their lives until the wreckage was cleared.
      When I was going through my EMT training, they made it very clear that it doesn't matter if people are bleeding out in front of you. If you go in while it's still dangerous, you're only being a liability to your fellow EMTs, Firefighters, and police.
      But let's ignore the low power outputs of these MH Fuel Cells. What other issues do we have?
      Well, the fuel cell itself must be created using some very interesting techniques and materials. The biggest expense would be the platinum. Other catalysts are needed as well. As well as a very special proton-permeable membrane.
      To function, the membrane must conduct hydrogen ions (protons) but not electrons as this would in effect "short circuit" the fuel cell. The membrane must also not allow either gas to pass to the other side of the cell, a problem known as gas crossover. Finally, the membrane must be resistant to the reducing environment at the cathode as well as the harsh oxidative environment at the anode.
      This system includes electrodes, electrolyte, catalyst, and a porous gas diffusion layer. The rate of reaction will be dependent also on how quickly the water vapor product can diffuse through the porous material and out of the system. A system can have a lowered efficiency if the fuel cell is too dry or too wet. A balance must be met.
      And while yes, all of these situations can be worked around, it all comes at a heavy price. Currently we are using 30 grams of platinum in vehicle sized PEM fuel cells. This number will be going down once different catalysts are created, but the cost of these vehicles still pushes up to $50,000. The cost will go down, like any technology.
      I've yet to speak about where we obtain this hydrogen gas from. The easiest way to obtain hydrogen gas is via the electrolysis of water. H20 + An Electric Current → H2 + O2, essentially (it's not balanced, I know this.)
      But that electric current must be created as well. This usually comes from the electric grid, which is still, depending on the state, a majority coal-burning.
      Natural Gas reformation is another way to obtain Hydrogen gas, and is the most common way we currently use. It's the cheapest as well. Synthesis gas, a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and a small amount of carbon dioxide, is created by reacting natural gas with high-temperature steam. The carbon monoxide is reacted with water to produce additional hydrogen.
      The other common ways are via fermentation of biofuel stocks (which is a long process without a great yield) or liquid reforming, which is really unfeasible in large quantities.
      The only way to obtain large amounts of hydrogen is via natural gas reformation, and that's still technically a fossil fuel source. So why were we going with hydrogen fuel cells again? To rid ourselves of dirty, dirty fossil fuel? Well shit.
      So to sum this up, the only way to safely use hydrogen as a fuel source in a moving vehicle would be by using metal hydrides, which require energy to access the stored hydrogen. This stored hydrogen flow rate is lower than standard PEMs, and results in a lower voltage, which in turn leads to a lower power output for the vehicle. More research and development must be done to find proper catalysts that can be made at a low cost, and production methods must be worked out to create the membranes more cheaply. All of this is held up by our hydrogen production systems.
      PEM fuel cell technology is awesome and I love it to death in many many situations. But vehicles isn't one of them.
      I may read about more advances in the near future that would change my opinion completely, but I would be surprised.
      Below I've added a problem out of my heat and mass transfer book (Incropera, 7th edition).

    • By StrelaCarbon
      Even though I'm relatively new to this forum, it did not take long at all for me to notice that here, I am in the company of many fellow petrolheads.
      Documenting the mildly interesting machines I encounter in my everyday life is something I like very much, and since I didn't see anyone here posting much about car spotting, I thought I'd make my own thread. So, if you have any pictures of interesting automotive finds, feel free to share them all right here. 
      To get the ball rolling, here's an imperfect (that racing seat looked really out of place, and there were some visible paint scratches) but still exquisite first-generation Mercury Cougar which I encountered this summer: 

  • Create New...