tomtom

On 15.05.2017 at 4:36 PM, LoooSeR said:

So Iraq is now mass-produce bombs to drop from UAVs...

Iraq shuttlecocks for sure look more interesting than normal ones. It's just HE or some kind of HEAT or combined thing?(or no data)

 

3 hours ago, Ramlaen said:

So H&K killed the XM25?

 

Kind of fucked up, that had a lot of promise.

So development of oversized grenade lunching AK/PP 2000 stopped... Bolt is oversize AK/PP 2000(at least it look like that for me) Sights(optics and all systems around in general) of such type are not that uncommon. Programmers are not hard to get. What they are developing in this thing for so long and how they fck up delivery.

Tested against UK row houses walls. They could to this against something more modern and better build...

So it's about firearms in general?

Fara 1 is radar named    Somebody know how gunner is supposed to know target just from this tiny monochromatic screen?

"Computers cannot create information that they weren't given in the first place.  Computers aren't magical.  They cannot improve the resolution of a grainy photo to show the face of the killer reflected in a raindrop."


With this I must strongly disagree. Computer(so well mathematics) can create data from nothing. Simplest pseudo-random number generator is doing pretty much that. Or for example camera in You smartphone is doing just that. Create colorfull image from partial data. Consoles do that in form of upscaling for example.

" They cannot improve the resolution of a grainy photo to show the face of the killer reflected in a raindrop."
Such system(algorithms) like in this vid are used in all kinds of CCTV for example(it's cheaper to run program on some ARM than buy hi res CCTV camera with good lenses).

But does size rly matter? It's not simple antenna. And generally the more complex system get the more it can "bend physics". I'm quite sure there are many ways to made antennae much much smaller while not loosing resolution or even gaining by design complexity. Also after getting data from antenna then come insane amount of mathematics(imagining theories, algorithms, AI, whatever) that probably can made from seemingly useless data, perfectly usable thing.

In some parts of the internet, enthusiastic, shall we say, commentators suggested that the wing antennae on the PAK-FA were some sort of super-duper stealth-busting L-band AESA system.  This is a completely stupid idea.  While it is true that L-band radars work better against stealth aircraft than X-band radars typically used in fighters, an L-band radar small enough to fit into the wings of the PAK-FA would have such poor resolution that it would be useless.


Producer itself state it's L band AESA radar. Also apparently it's already implemented in other SU planes. And generally they(Russians) have experience in L band radars.

http://www.niip.ru/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=22:-l-&catid=30:esa-with-ebs&Itemid=42

Upper photo what is this thing? Weird shotgun with bipod/small grande launcher/electronic warfare thing/flame thrower/training device? 
Bottom how is that granade launcher called?

1 minute ago, LoooSeR said:

we have dedicated thread for small arms for this type of questions.

photos are from this thread that's why question here

Upper photo what is this thing? Weird shotgun with bipod/small grande launcher/electronic warfare thing/flame thrower/training device? 
Bottom how is that granade launcher called?

On 17.04.2017 at 1:16 PM, LoooSeR said:

Close up of the turret:

 

Also, look at the device to the left from smoke grenade launchers - it looks like laser sensor (at least for me). On photo in your post you can see same device on other side of the turret. Chonma-216 really looks like most advanced Best Korean tank.

On the right side of photo(left side of turret) it's anti tank rocket or other kind of AA rocket?

On 23.04.2017 at 8:36 PM, Militarysta said:

Yes, in what language? English, Polish or Russian?

As long it's latinised alphabet . So well not "standard" russian.

After watching most of those photos...

Bulat MB is simply bad. Mainly because of carousel design.? But then why not redesigning turret.

Are there some photos of Nóż actually working how it was supposed?

Do photos/vids confirm that Ukrainian forces were using outdated totally not applicable for asymmetric conflict tactics?

On 21.02.2017 at 0:13 AM, DD000 said:

 

What does it say for the 6th material down? The one with a density of 1.0 - 1.1 g/cc. (Also, it triggers me that the rows for the material and values in the second table aren't aligned...)

Polyurethane, polyethylene in multi layered systems alternately(more proceeded by(I have no fck idea what they meant there so literal translation)) with layers of steel.

If anything else need to be translated from Polish language I can do it.