Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Sgt.Squarehead

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    983
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sgt.Squarehead

  1. 1 hour ago, Toxn said:

    I was thinking a tiny EFP (maybe 20cm diameter). Just enough to kill someone or break a sensitive piece of equipment.

     

    Barring that - a single-use carbon fibre barrel running the length of the fuselage, with a pistol cartridge at the breech end.

     

    What about gas or even a poison needle? 

     

    I could see a swarm of such things being incredibly effective in hostage scenarios, delivering incapacitating agents directly to the bad guys.

  2. Possibly the most ridiculously selective (& utterly self defeating) survey that I've ever seen:

     

    http://arabcenterdc.org/survey/arabs-opinion-trump-oct-2017/

     

    Quote

    When asked about their general views of the United States, almost half of the Arab public surveyed expressed positive views (48%).

     

    Well, the ones who haven't recently been bombed by the US, at any rate.....I'm guessing including polling figures from Iraq, Syria & Libya might skew those numbers a bit.  :rolleyes:

     

    PS - If you believe that shit, I've got some seafront property in Birmingham that would make a perfect vacation home for you.  :)

  3. Consortium News suggest a change in US stance towards Hezbollah may be imminent:

     

    https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/23/the-unwritten-rule-between-us-and-hizbullah/

     

    IIRC Lebanon & Iran are the only nations on the infamous 'list' that the US has not directly attacked yet.....Time to tick off another? 

     

    You can never have too many military fiascos on-going at once, apparently.....But hey, Israel will be happy.

  4. To be fair, the UK Tories (in conjunction with your US Democrats) do seem to be dead set on starting something with Russia that they presumably expect the US to finish.....Suffice it to say that I don't identify with any part of that, nor in my experience do a good portion of the British public, despite what our media would have you believe.

  5. On ‎1‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 7:47 PM, Sturgeon said:

     

    If your country bordered Mexico at the South, you'd already be at war with them.

     

    We have the whole of Europe for our jollies.

     

    On ‎1‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 6:53 PM, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:

    Like it hasn't been previously?

     

    You ain't seen nothing yet.....Ask Turkey. 

     

    22 hours ago, Lord_James said:

     

    Britain is more likely to spread its cheeks and beg to daddy before it goes to war. 

     

    What?  You appreciate what language you are you are (ab)using and how that came to be?  You couldn't be more wrong unless you were speaking Latin, or perhaps Mongolian.

     

    21 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

     

    Incompetent war.

     

    Coming from an American that's absolutely fucking priceless.

  6. This probably won't help negotiations much:

     

    Quote

    Noting that missile bases would presumably have to be part of any agreement committing North Korea to “complete, verifiable, and irreversible” denuclearisation, Cha warned: “The North Koreans are not going to negotiate over things they don’t disclose. It looks like they’re playing a game. They’re still going to have all this operational capability” even if they destroy their disclosed nuclear facilities.

     

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/22/north-korea-secret-missile-hq-uncovered-as-nuclear-summit-nears

     

    Kim's a sneaky little fucker, & that's a fact.  :lol:

  7. Does this article strike anyone else as being irrationally optimistic:

     

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/taliban-peace-talks-us-afghanistan-war-troops-withdraw-a8733166.html

     

    Further sources (from article, but it swiftly shows the sort of drivel they're using as evidence):

     

    https://www.csis.org/analysis/state-afghan-war

     

    The Taliban and its ideology are deeply unpopular, even compared to the current government and it security forces. A nationwide poll in 2015, for example, found that 92 percent of Afghans supported the Kabul government and only 4 percent favored the Taliban.

     

    It's not explicitly stated, but I'm guessing absolutely bloody certain that would be a survey of those living in the areas of the country controlled by the government.....Due to the return of data, rather than the pollster's severed head.  :rolleyes:

     

×
×
  • Create New...