-
Posts
361 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by D.E. Watters
-
-
On 10/12/2018 at 12:23 AM, N-L-M said:
http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD0352807
Lazy Dog darts.
Back in 2009, I stumbled across a site hosting the annual command histories for the Commander in Chief Pacific (CINCPAC) from 1960 through the mid-'80s. I found an interesting tidbit in the 1974 history regarding an examination of establishing South Vietnamese production of the Lazy Dog munition for the VNAF.
Quote“Commander in Chief Pacific Command History 1974 - Volume I, pp 248-249”
LAZY DOG Weapon System as an Aircraft Area Munition
Scientific Analysis Group Report No. 1-74 on the LAZY DOG system was requested by the Defense Attache in Saigon as part of his effort to cut down on the cost of the continuing war in Vietnam. He was specifically looking for items that RVN industry could produce at lower cost than comparable U.S. items. Air delivered munitions, all produced in the United States, were one of the single items of greatest expense. LAZY DOG was believed to be a highly effective but unsophisticated anti-personnel weapon. It had been purged from both USAF and Navy systems, but there remained many “assets,” missiles, dispensers, drawings, studies, etc., located in the Air Force and Navy R&D community that were considered useful. Further assessment was to be made to determine the feasibility of developing a LAZY DOG manufacturing capability in the RVN, and a capability for the VNAF to deliver it. 1
1. J35 HistSum Aug 74; Scientific Analysis Group Report No. 1-74 , 25 April 74, Subj: A Review of the LAZY DOG Weapon System as an Aircraft Area Munition.
-
On 9/24/2018 at 9:26 PM, Meplat said:
Now make it in 6.5X55 Swede..
Hahaha!
(which no kidding, would be a fantastic idea, as 6.5X55 is absurdly underrated..An AR platform using 6,5 Swede would be amazing,)
A Czech company did just that, as well as a 7.5mm Swiss variant. Google the Luvo Arms LA-11. -
Just stumbled across this 1973-vintage document on DTIC: "The Source Locator: A Directory of Information Sources in Small Arms Technology and Thesaurus."
Just at the start I see a directory of all of the then current DOD personnel working on US small arms R&D, including a description of their areas of expertise. -
Here is a direct link to William C. Davis, Jr.'s report on the modified T48: “An Investigation of an Experimental Caliber .22 High Velocity Bullet for Rifles.”
https://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/101401.pdf
-
On 6/24/2018 at 6:27 PM, Ramlaen said:
SALVO I rifle field experiment
The T48 appears to have been chambered in what became .223 Remington.
No, that was the .22 Homologous, using a 7.62mm NATO case necked down for 0.224" projectiles. -
FWIW: There has been additional patent activity on the Federal 9mm EPR.
https://patents.google.com/patent/USD813974
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1="20180156584".PGNR.&OS=DN/20180156584&RS=DN/20180156584
(Note that this application was filed once the patent Sturgeon listed was granted.) -
On 5/23/2018 at 4:52 PM, Sturgeon said:
The document you linked is Appendix 7 of the Ichord report, here's a not-so-great copy of the whole report. You can find better versions of all the appendices, and the report itself if I recall, on DTIC.
FWIW: The former document was part of the 12 volume report assembled by the US Army in response to the Ichord Subcommittee's report. I linked all 12 volumes here.
http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/topic/104-documents-repository-small-arms/?page=3&tab=comments#comment-129310
Ichord Subcommittee Hearings Transcript
https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uiug.30112109164266
Ichord Subcommittee Report
https://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951p00793094y -
On 5/23/2018 at 2:31 PM, Collimatrix said:
That's a good point. The only issue with a semi-rim is that it necessitates the use of a new bolt face for the AGL variant.
Maybe it would have made more sense to use 23x152mmB ammunition as the starting point.
It is conceivable that both the rimless and semi-rimmed cartridges could work with a breechface sized for the semi-rim. -
2 hours ago, Collimatrix said:
If it is semi-rimmed but the others are not, how does it fit into the common link?
Perhaps that's why they made a new common link, instead of using the legacy KPV link? You are either going to use a semi-rim or belt on a cartridge like that. I wouldn't trust the rotating band for headspacing.
FWIW: The US played with its Cal .60 case by necking it down to 12.7mm and all the way up to 27mm before deciding upon the 20x102mm.
-
21 hours ago, Collimatrix said:
I am probably re-stating the obvious here, but this looks like an attempt to make an all-in-one heavy machine gun/light autocannon/grenade launcher.
The round on the left looks like a dummy 14.5x114mm, the round in the middle looks like the same case, but necked down to 12.7mm, and the case on the right is a mock-up of a grenade cartridge. All three cases have the same rim and body dimensions, so they can all use the same links. I don't recognize the links, they don't look like links for a 23mm cannon or for a 14.5mm HMG.
The fat boi cartridge case looks to be semi-rimmed. I'm guessing that it is in the 25mm range. -
On 5/15/2018 at 2:42 PM, Collimatrix said:
How many barrels total were tested? Barrels of the same caliber and length will often show consistent muzzle velocity differences of tens of feet per second for no apparent reason.
Don't know. The 2018 presentations haven't been posted on DTIC's webpage yet.
When they go up, it will probably be at this link:
https://ndia.dtic.mil/2018/armament/2018armament.html -
4 hours ago, Donward said:
And the best movie marketing scheme of 2018 goes to "Revenge"
Also, how does a 98 pound woman with zero body fat beat the shit out of three guys after being shot and - I think - impaled on a tree after a terrible fall and left to die without food and water in the heat of the Arizona summer?
My immediate guess is the supernatural, like "The Crow" and several other supernatural revenge flicks. -
On 11/18/2017 at 9:30 AM, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:
I was literally just about to post this.
I honestly cannot believe this is even real. OF ALL THE DAMNED IP'S TO ADAPT TO FILM!?
If they don't bash up a moon base I'm rioting.
I'm anxiously awaiting the Q-Bert and Frogger movies.
Loved the Rampage arcades games though... -
5 hours ago, Meplat said:
Nothing is more telling than looking at a tablefull of AR18's and AR180's, and noting the differences.
Buy an (original) Armalite for collecting, a Howa for shooting, and a Sterling for parts..
I caught a 1971 International Defense Review on eBay the other week. It confirmed the Lockheed connection for International sales. They would also supply the tooling and setup, while ArmaLite would handle QC. Another interesting comment was that Mauser was looking at buying a license for it. -
-
Here are links to all 12 volumes of the US Army's "Report of the M16 Rifle Review Panel" written in response to the Ichord Subcommittee Hearings and Report. DTIC has finally made the entire set available online for free download.
History of the M16 Weapon System
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953110.pdf
Small Arms Test Policies and Procedures
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953111.pdf
Audit Trail and Analysis of M16A1 Weapon and Ammunition System Tests
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953112.pdf
Review and Analysis of M16 Rifle Training
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953113.pdf
Ammunition Development Program
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953114.pdf
Procurement, Production, and Distribution History of the AR15-M16-M16A1 Weapon System
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953115.pdf
Review and Analysis of M16 System Reliability
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953116.pdf
M16 Surveys in the Republic of Vietnam
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953117.pdf
Review and Analysis of the Army Organizational Structure and Management Practices for the Development, Testing, and Product Improvement of Small Arms Rifle Systems
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953118.pdf
Audit Trail of Chief of Staff, Army Actions and Decisions Concerning the M16
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953119.pdf
The Army Small Arms Program
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953120.pdf
M16 Product Improvement Modifications
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a953121.pdf- Jeeps_Guns_Tanks and Belesarius
- 1
- 1
-
On 3/24/2018 at 4:53 AM, LoooSeR said:
SAR once wrote up a Class II Manufacturer that had converted a PSL from 7.62x54mmR to .50 Alaskan. -
11 hours ago, LostCosmonaut said:
I'm guessing the SAS has a bit more freedom in their procurement (like most special forces units seem to).
The story at the time was that the SAS spent more money in testing the candidate weapons than they did in purchasing the selected L119A1. -
On 3/6/2018 at 8:20 PM, Sturgeon said:
Knox blew up a lot of test barrels with their ammo, from what I hear.
Someone still needs to interview Knox's George Reynolds before he gets too old and begins pining for the fjords.
I want to know about his 30mm single-shot and semi-auto underbarrel grenade launcher designs for the US Army back in the 1970s. I believe that he was also behind Knox's standalone semi-auto 30mm grenade launcher that was flogged for several years by Honeywell and then ATK before the OICW program finally drove a stake through its heart. Most folks know him now for the current Armalite AR30 and AR50 rifles. -
12 hours ago, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:
On its surface, this ad isn't nearly as offensive as the others I've posted. But let's pick it apart.
For Sale: Rare "Paul Jaeger" Customized Mauser
$ 2,075Let's start with the pictures. This is a "custom" 7mm mauser. I don't know this Paul guy, but he looks like he knows what he's doing with a dremel and a blueing tank. Good for him.
FWIW: Paul Jaeger has something of a cult following among custom rifle collectors.
http://www.germanhuntingguns.com/archives/archive-jaeger-paul/ -
On 12/9/2017 at 9:15 PM, Sturgeon said:
Never mind that the British SAS had acquired 5,000 AR-15 in 1965, and put them to use almost immediately in Borneo. Never mind that they ordered another 13,000, circa 1967. -
I still want to see the unsolicited Brunswick SAW.
https://www.google.com/patents/US4066000
For that matter, I'd also like to get more information on the Springfield and AAI belt-fed machineguns chambered for SPIW cartridges. -
On 11/20/2017 at 9:32 PM, Sturgeon said:
Bunch of G11 docs at the SAR archive (gotta search "G11" sadly).
The ACR trials final summary is also there. It describes all of the candidates, even those that didn't make it to the trials. Mind you, there are two copies; one is a crappy photocopy, while the other looks like it was scanned from an original. I think this is the correct one.
"Advanced Combat Rifle (ACR) Program, Volume I, ACR Program Summary" February 1992
https://www.smallarmsreview.com/archive/detail.arc.entry.cfm?arcid=S00440 -
On 11/7/2017 at 10:14 AM, 2805662 said:
http://dspace.dsto.defence.gov.au/dspace/bitstream/1947/3812/1/DSTO-GD-0003 PR.pdf
analysis on what different muzzle devices do to shot dispersion: FN Minimi.
The US Army tried to duplicate the Aussies' results and couldn't.
"Flash Suppressor Comparisons and Analysis for the F89 and M249 Machine Guns" February 1993
The Small Arms Thread, Part 8: 2018; ICSR to be replaced by US Army with interim 15mm Revolver Cannon.
in Infantry Tools & Tactics
Posted
Dean Speir covered this over at "The Gun Zone" back when it happened in 2001.
Initial Report
https://web.archive.org/web/20160317190046/http://www.thegunzone.com:80/m1akb.html
Shooter's Reply
https://web.archive.org/web/20160315120725/http://thegunzone.com/m1akb/762d2.html
Necropsy
https://web.archive.org/web/20160315121736/http://thegunzone.com/m1akb/762r.html