Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

chihab

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chihab

  1. On 8/26/2017 at 11:44 AM, LoooSeR said:

       Tubes in the turret near turret ring - yes. Thing, that those arrows point, are covers of capbles that are used change magnetic field of the vehicles to decrease chance of detonating over vehicle of ATGM with magnetic sensors .  

    According to the Russian wiki it is ERA 

    Tower4-T14.png

     

    for the interception projectiles launchers (launchers arrays) T-14 have two launcher placed on either side of the turret

     

    892a5f3e2aa14b48f7747cbccda0a174-50.jpg

     

    from the Russian wiki

     

    Tower-T14.jpg?uselang=ru

     

    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Афганит_(активная_защита)

     

    Ejection launcher hatch
     

    294526_original.jpg

     

    has a removable cover

     

    004.jpg

  2. On 2/19/2017 at 10:20 AM, Militarysta said:

    It's well describe in many sources - in Pz-3IT, Kornet, Metis-M, etc precursor is non initiating (not igniting ERA casette) - clou is to make a hole in ERA without igniting it. So linear is made not from Cu or Mo but teflon or other non-metalic linears. Whole "cumulative jet" made for such material have low densinity and in some way make big hole without igniting ERA.

     

    w09GJJN.jpg

     

    [imgfshm8Vr.jpg

     

    thank you very much for the informations and sources

    and i will ask you for your source about that  Kornet and Metis-M have a non initiating precursor 

    and in your article in otvaga 2004 you said that RPG 28 and 29 have a non initiating precursor too i wish if you give me the source too

     

  3. On 7/9/2017 at 8:29 PM, MrMartin said:

    They are called T-90SA because there isn't any other name known for it.

     

    It isn't exactly true because they are missing the MTShU-1-7 modulator (boxes behind the Shtora lights).

    I don't know why they don't have them and what purpose does it serve. It can't be because of the secret technology(Syrian T-90s have it). I think it could be because of the newer Shtora-1 system.

    We were wrong
    System modules are integrated
    Algerian tanks have full Shtora-1

    tshu-1-7m_4.jpg

  4. 18 minutes ago, MrMartin said:

    9hey are called T-90SA because there isn't any other name known for it.

     

    It isn't exactly true because they are missing the MTShU-1-7 modulator (boxes behind the Shtora lights).

    I don't know why they don't have them and what purpose does it serve. It can't be because of secret technology(Syrian T-90s have it). I think it could be because of newer Shtora-1 system.

    My mistake the Algerian tank does not have a complete Shtora-1 

    for the Syrian tank it is not a export version .. it is the Russian T90A  

  5. 1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:

    Turret is jammed and weapon system probably don't work so i expected them to Jihad Design bureau it into APC or IFV on T-90 chassis. Using it to make VBIED is wastefull, for artillery - very ineffective (weight of armor and resulting carrying capacity is not up to task).

    i don't think they have ability to make a IFV from T-90 chassis ! they need some manufacture capacity except IS have it 

    for artillery i speak about the static firing and fire support i think the tank can't fire in move anyway 

×
×
  • Create New...