Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Mohamed A

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    286
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mohamed A

  1. Those T-80BVs were Yemen's army (or Republican guards) tanks from Belarus, AFAIK. Those tanks are like 20 years old. Plenty of them were simply abandoned.

     

    CvKUwAY.jpg

     

    Oh, OK. Thanks.

     

    Still though, my point was that training is the key in tank performance not the tank itself. (though there are some tanks which just can't do good right now even with exceptional crews. mainly very old ones.)

  2. T-80s in UAE? I saw only Leclercs in Yemen. BMP-3 was destroyed by AT landmine.

     

    There was a picture of a destroyed tank that looked a lot like a T-80 in Yemen. I'll try to find it again. I found it very strange because I didn't think UAE bought T-80s. 

     

    For the BMP-3, there was also an incident when an ATGM crew managed to ambush a BMP-3.

  3. That thing saw combat? (Or, better to say "was presented at battlefield")

    tqW3L.jpg

     

    Yes. T-55 Enigma. Iraqi upgrade for T-55/T-55A. It has ceramic spaced armor (no idea if this is better than normal spaced armor). The idea might not seem impressive to you, but it's actually very good vs Iran because at the time the Enigma was made, Iran was doing nothing but spamming HEAT shells.

  4. Yeah, I also heard same thing from different sources. Is there any direct evidence or interviews about that subject?

     

    Which subject? Chrysler XM1 being chosen? Or XK1 being based on GM XM1/Chrysler?

     

    If it's the former, I can give you one.

     

    But the latter.. no. K1 development is very hard to follow.. only Korean books talk about it sadly. Maybe a few French books too, but I don't know how to speak French.

  5. Does this count? :D

     

    qzb5.jpg

     

    Iraq.

     

    M1A2 vs MiG-25. My friend (he's that guy with the camera) said that they were surprised to see it actually looking good after this. Obviously it was ruined, but it looked in OK condition for being run over by a 70 ton tank (I know the official weight of the M1A2 is much lower than that, but they carried more than average loadout there).

  6. People keep ragging on about commander's cupolas being such a German advantage, yet why don't the Jagdpanther, Jagdpanzer and Jagdtiger have them ?

     

    VfBHrDe.jpg

     

    They didn't need them. They were meant to be used as ambush/defense tanks. You are meant to know where the enemy was comming.. Most of the time anyway.

     

    German crews did like German cupolas, though (and tbh, their cupolas are much better than the T-34 "hatch". Should've used T-72 style hatch with glass in between. The early T-34 one protects you from fire, sure, but it also blocks visibility). If I am not wrong, it was Otto Carius who designed the Leopard 1's cupola. 

     

     

    Further cementing the StuG as the best German tank.

     

    It's not a tank though.. At least by German classification. (though the StuG IV did replace Panzer IV losses funnily enough. along with the Jagdpanzer IV)

     

    I don't know much about the Kanonenjagdpanzer, but it seems to use StuG III Ausf. G style cupola? 

     

     

    Hold your horses there silver, the Jadpanzer had a commader's periscope, sherman style, pretty nifty if you ask me

     

    You sure...? IIRC they only had scherenfernrohr for the commander and a telescope sight for the gunner.

×
×
  • Create New...