Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect

Scrublord
  • Posts

    3,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Posts posted by Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect

  1. Evolution works by random mutations of DNA getting borked by transcription errors, ionizing radiation and teratogenic chemicals in such a manner that the borked DNA actually does something useful.

     

    The odds of feathers evolving twice are astronomical.

    That's a vast oversimplification, and even at that you left out a couple pretty important factors. 

     

     

    And to the topic at hand, some dinosaurs had feathers.  Some did not. To make broad claims over millions of years, in a greatly changing climate and ecosystem, would be silly. 

     

    They had as many feathers as they needed to survive.  They were as colorful as required for their niche. Dinosaurs aren't some mythical set of unicorns that defy all known population genetics knowledge. 

  2. Uh oh, "Rifter" over at the 68 forums really put a hurt on the Author! He even says so!

     

    "He got told about his lack of facts by me and and couple of others. I just spent an hour over there dropping the hammer on him. He claims he's been lurking over here but it sure doesn't seem like it. He just doesn't seem to know what really is going on."

  3. Compare the .30-30 LEVERevolution stuff to 6.8SPC. See what comes out on top. That would be an entertaining, and pointless, article. 

     

    Thread retitled to be more accurate.

    Lots of additional lulz to be had over at 68forums, including constructor trying to insult me and accidentally insulting 68forum members, instead.

     

    Damnit, damnit damnit, why did I click that? Why? I hate you, Sturgis-man. 

     

    EDIT: 

     

    After reading through the forum post, some are actually like "Guys, we shouldn't be so quick, did you read his article?" And then the rest do something like this.

     

    "Yeah, so we were wrong and lieing just to get the community angry at this author, but who cares? He hates 6.8. He hates something we love.  We can't abide by that."

  4. My favorite so far is Mad Gorilla. 

     

     
    Mad_Gorilla  Nathaniel F.  3 hours ago

    It is not disingenuous or misleading. Nearly every military dropped the 6.5 in favor of something in the .30 caliber range. 6.5 just wasn't effective on the battlefield. When everybody went to spitzers in the mid-20's, the 6.5s couldn't compete because the bullets were too light after the change to spitzer. And that was in cases about the same size as the .308. Put a 6.5 in an a case that only has half the powder of the .308, and you still have the same issues. And yes, .013" does make a difference. Everybody rants about BC, but I'll take a lower BC better balanced bullet over a long skinny high BC any day.

  5. Just for measure, purely scientific interest, how large is that Daidal acanthocercus? Large as, say, a small dog? A petite human? Could you possibly fit a collar around its exoskeleton? 

     

    Do you think its appendages had the dexterity to undo knots?

  6. Lamentably when I open word it's for nerd boardgames, not word stringing together (incidentally, I have put up a link to my rules draft on that thread)

    I always thought I'd have much too much fun with tabletop gaming.  But everytime I visit a local lounge or game shop, but the smell usually scares me away. 

×
×
  • Create New...