-
Posts
1,521 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
Recent Profile Visitors
2,486 profile views
Xlucine's Achievements
Newbie (1/3)
332
Reputation
-
Dragonstriker reacted to a post in a topic: Archery Thread
-
Dragonstriker reacted to a post in a topic: Designing A Rifle From Scratch(ish)
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: Turkish touch
-
General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.
Xlucine replied to LoooSeR's topic in Mechanized Warfare
Hwaskander HWATACMS- 1,902 replies
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: Czechoslovak interwar bits
-
Wouldn't a snorkel leak flood the centre compartment, bringing the sub down evenly?
-
Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) and Euro Main Battle Tank (EMBT)
Xlucine replied to FORMATOSE's topic in Mechanized Warfare
This isn't a small arm where the user is leaning the handguards on walls and such, so you don't need to isolate the barrel from any loads applied to the firearm structure. The ballistics in this case are going to be dependant on the barrel harmonics (i.e. where the nodes & antinodes are), and using the structure to force a node right by the end of the barrel should improve the shooting consistency. It's not a thermal shroud (due to the holes), and it's not to reduce radar cross-section (also due to the holes) - the only other use left is structure, and cutting holes in a structure like that is a good way to improve the mass efficiency.- 390 replies
-
- knds
- demonstrator
- (and 9 more)
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: Polish Armoured Vehicles
-
Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) and Euro Main Battle Tank (EMBT)
Xlucine replied to FORMATOSE's topic in Mechanized Warfare
The heterogeneous heating of gun barrels is primarily due to sunlight (as the heat from firing is evenly distributed around the circumference), so it's odd to see a thermal shroud with holes in (which would allow sunlight onto the barrel, especially the holes in the top). The shape is also inefficient as a thermal shroud, normally they're wrapped tighter around the gun to minimise the extra weight. My money's on it being a structural support only- 390 replies
-
- knds
- demonstrator
- (and 9 more)
-
A dozer with a root rake is pretty close to a full-width mine plough
- 581 replies
-
- leclerc mbt
- vbci
- (and 18 more)
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
-
General Naval Warfare News/Technology thread.
Xlucine replied to Belesarius's topic in Naval Discussion
There's no need to worry about supersonic tip speeds on ships (with c0 = 1.5 km/s), but the rest of the aero/hydrodynamics is pretty similar -
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: The Space Exploration Achievements Thread
-
Ramlaen reacted to a post in a topic: Bash the F-35 thred.
-
Hah "It's unfair to expect a fighter jet to fight, ours are ideal for recent wars in afghanistan NO STOP LOOKING AT THAT TUCANO" "We tried to twist their arm into excluding lockmart on a technicality, but it didn't work"
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: Czechoslovak interwar bits
-
Xlucine reacted to a post in a topic: Books About Tanks
-
UK F-35 on ops over syria&iraq: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/history-made-as-uk-f-35s-complete-first-operational-missions They deployed to cyprus as an exercise to show that the plans for deploying away from main base worked, and it went so well they decided to buzz syria while they were there.
-
The Soviet Tank Thread: Transversely Mounted 1000hp Engines
Xlucine replied to T___A's topic in Mechanized Warfare
Sort-of-direct translation of "hardened", or were they talking about steel cored AP? Seems to me that "hardened" could include WC cores, but "heat-strengthened" suggests just steel (and steel cored 7.62 at 30m seems kinda dull, with the gerpercers the US is looking at)- 5,187 replies
-
- soviet
- russian bias
-
(and 15 more)
Tagged with:
- soviet
- russian bias
- kharkovites get out
- kotin number 1 diva of ages
- kartsev did nothing wrong
- reminder that the is-7 had 8 machine guns
- reminder that uvz built more t-34s than khpz
- real life has a uvz bias
- make lkz great again
- t-72 over t-64 all day erry day
- t-80 worst mistake of lkz life
- the object 167t engine was better
- so was object 278 engine
- t-64 so weak it cannot handle glorious t-34 engine which conquered hitlerite germany
- t-64
- t-72
- heavy tanks
-
Just a "disruptive passenger" on a commercial flight https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-48732642 Quite a response for a drunk woman
-
Belesarius reacted to a post in a topic: US/Iran flirting with quagmire thred.
-
Ramlaen reacted to a post in a topic: US/Iran flirting with quagmire thred.
-
Called off strike has been officially confirmed
-
Scolopax reacted to a post in a topic: US/Iran flirting with quagmire thred.
-
GMerlon reacted to a post in a topic: US/Iran flirting with quagmire thred.
-
Belesarius reacted to a post in a topic: US/Iran flirting with quagmire thred.
-
"rofl-stomping" doesn't fit in the usual list of goals in conflict. Iran's likely goal is to be the biggest pain in the arse possible, and they have the deck stacked in their favour: 21% of the worlds oil flows through that strait, and it'll take anywhere from a week to a month to clear the mines (a week for a narrow, sort-of-safe channel, but what insurer would accept a 10% chance they lose the ship?). That's without iranian forces interrupting the MCM, or targeting tankers in other regions near the iranian coast (ASM launchers won't last longer than their first salvo, but that's a lot of missiles in the air. You can't reliably get them before they fire either, as iraqi scuds proved - and scuds are larger than ASMs). For reference the 1979 oil crisis only involved a 4% drop in oil production, and lead to a doubling of the price of oil. The US options to respond are pretty short of a rofl-stomp - they can muster a small air & naval campaign at best with the forces available. The first gulf war involved thousands of aircraft (compare to the few squadrons moved to the region recently), and even with a ground campaign saddam wasn't replaced. They could sink most of the iranian naval assets, probably enforce air superiority over the important bits, pop most of the ASM launchers, and might as well strike the nuclear facilities, but what's the end-state? How do they get the iranians to stop fighting, short of a total occupation (something that would be several times larger than gulf war 2)? ASMs have shown up in the hands of non-state actors, so a bloodied state actor like iran could dangle the credible threat of ASM strikes on nearby shipping for the foreseeable future even with a constant US fast jet presence. Autonomous mine countermeasures has the potential to greatly improve MCM speed, but it's not ready today in the numbers needed and doesn't solve the ASM issue.