Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Serge

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Posts posted by Serge

  1. On 2 septembre 2017 at 11:21 AM, SH_MM said:

    The TDD doesn't have side armor on the turret... never noticed that before.

    Both Olifant Mk-1B and Mk-2 armor packages are similar considering there covering.

    Heavy armor modules stop at the middle of hatches. 

  2.  

    Quote

    Well, the title of the topic is a bit biased and certainly makes it look like this is a bashing topic only, I didn't have the intention to bash anything for no reason.

    The CV90 is a popular choice and it is not inferior to most other IFVs, but it is often praised for questionable reasons and has a large fanbase, that sometimes doesn't look at the facts. In so far I think the title chosen by Serge, "Why so much love?", seems to be quite fitting.

    The title comes from a French forum where the topic devoted to CV90 is called "CV90, pourquoi tant d'amour ?"

     

    My purpose is not to bash any AFV. My purpose is to collect efficiently, in a dedicated place, informations about CV90 to help anyone to form his own opinion. This is the best to avoid fanboys attitudes.

     

    For me, I was very impressed by the Swedish consistency of the programme.

  3.  

    On 2 septembre 2017 at 2:41 PM, SH_MM said:

    In the late 1980s/1990s.

    The introduction of mine protection was the discovering of the TMRP-6 in Yougoslavia.

     

    On 2 septembre 2017 at 2:41 PM, SH_MM said:

    But I doubt that the CV90's seats were installed for mine protection; first of all BAE Systems mentions no mine protection in their recent presentation, also the belly armor is too thin.

    The very purpose of this seat was to enshure the hull low profil by Hagglunds.

  4. 2 hours ago, Ramlaen said:

    How much headspace does that add and how does it compare to other IFV's?

    The new roof for Strf-90 is 170mm higher. A rebuilt chassis was made at least 5 years ago. 

     

    To well consider the eight of troop compartment, you must consider seats design first. 

    Bradley, Namer... are using basic seats. CV-90s, like SPz-Puma, are using close to the floor configuration to achieve a very low profil compartment.

    So, comparison can't be made trough absolute figures but through momentum. By 1998, the Warrior-2000 rear compartment was 50mm higher than the initial MCV-80 one.

    The Bradley NG is 178mm, the futur Strf-90 will be 170mm.

  5. Lets start a thread about the CV-90. Past, present, futur. 

    Link to the Linström's page about the initial Stridsfordon-90 project :

    http://www.ointres.se/projekt_strf90.htm

     

    An interesting SH-MM post about evolution of CV-90 :

    And a summary about contenders for the forseen Czech IFV programme :

    http://below-the-turret-ring.blogspot.pt/2017/08/which-new-ifv-for-czech-army.html?m=1

     

    From a well known blog. ;)

  6. 13 hours ago, Collimatrix said:

    If you think you have enough material, go ahead and make one!

    CV-90 is one vehicle I don't know much about.

    I don't have it but we do have it. 

     

    I will open one about it. It will help keeping clear material and talks. 

     

    Look at the T14 thread. I worth to be split because it deels about both K17 and Kurganets-25 too. 

×
×
  • Create New...