Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

2805662

Contributing Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 2805662

  1. 2805662
    Looks like some kind of driver viewer equipment.
  2. 2805662
    I’m betting against L400-3 getting up at all, thanks to the DSR.
  3. 2805662
    BAE report on their OMFV submission, which included this graphic.
  4. 2805662
    Some more detail, here:
  5. 2805662
    I get what you mean. I reckon - speculation alert - that the core auto loader is the Meggitt action with the capacity adjusted to the size constraints. I’ll see if I can get a definitive answer, as I didn’t have any luck today.
  6. 2805662
    I just asked the GD PM on the booth. He said it was the Meggitt auto loader. Make of that what you will.
  7. 2805662
    Spoke to the Meggitt guy. I’ll reengage today to clarify.
  8. 2805662
    34 rounds in the cassette - not carousel - if that’s the off the shelf configuration.
  9. 2805662
    Elbit USA’s UT50 turret for the BAE OMFV.
  10. 2805662
    I’ve got a research request regarding the M48. I’ve found some good turret references online: But nothing as detailed for the hull. Any pointers welcome. Cheers.
  11. 2805662
    In what amounts to one of the most prolonged examples of capability edging, we’re reentering the decision/announcement window for 400-3. RUMINT has some interesting points of speculation, noting that this is a mix of industry, CASG, AHQ, & think tank chatter. Options reportedly discussed: - a reduction of 400-3 to 100 vehicles, with 400-4 being a follow-on buy of an unspecified quantity. - up to 1/3 of of the procured number of vehicles, whatever that number is, being fitted for, but not with a turret, having a RWS instead to reduce costs. Additional turrets would be procured during -3 sustainment. - all ‘manoeuvre support vehicle’ variants being deleted, with the capability need being met by the Heavy Armoured Capability System M1150 breachers & M1110 AVLB. Time will tell, but the predicted post-election turbulence has come to pass. The minister for defence/deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has recused himself from the selection process, given the implications for his electorate. The selection will be proceeding regardless of the Defence Strategic Review.
  12. 2805662
    It was present on the 2003 invasion of Iraq vehicles. Iirc, the later bar armour was Afghan specific.
  13. 2805662
    Looking at CVR(T), specifically the turret. Any pointers for references for turret geometry/layout would be welcome. The only information I’ve got is “Metal Plate, Aluminium Alloy, Armour” ranging in thickness from 3/4” to 1 - 1/2”. Diagrams, sections, drawings welcome. Looking to draw up a basic shell in CAD.
  14. 2805662
    Looks like JLTV is back on the cards.
  15. 2805662
    Another parliamentary update on AJAX. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmpubacc/259/summary.html
  16. 2805662
    Yep, I was referring to the Rheinmetall slide at €4bn. Interestingly, the Phase 2 cam tract was the largest in Rheinmetall’s history. Should they take Phase 3, it would supplant that record.
  17. 2805662
    €10 million = $AUD14.8 million.
  18. 2805662
    Gun shields, sorry, “Objective Commander’s Weapon Station” for AMPV: https://www.army.mil/article/255320/?fbclid=IwAR2sB31uEVi5ao3EHZQ2dS2GR2GiA65zwrMxkagqktxdC5HB0hfA4OSynD8&linkId=160429295
  19. 2805662
    Tracking the topic - I started the thread in 2018! If the Chief is saying that it’s two years until Boxer gets Spike - if at all - then turreted Block 2 Boxers won’t be seen until 2024/25 at the earliest. The Block 1 Boxers are back at Redbank as of last month. No idea what they’re in for, or for how long. An apparent side effect of using a gas-operated, medium calibre gun in a crewed turret, rather than an externally-powered chain gun, Is toxicity in the crew module. This is further exacerbated by a high(er than necessary) rate of fire. Will be interesting if this problem persists into Lance 2.0.
  20. 2805662
    Some more from the Chief of Army about Lance on Boxer: https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/army-says-boxer-8x8-will-not-be-able-to-fire-guided-missiles/ “It will not have an organic anti-armour weapon – they will be carried by the troops inside to engage those sorts of threats.” On Iron Fist (or any active protection system): ”Another surprise was the revelation that Boxers will not be equipped with an Active Protection System (APS)…Originally the Boxers were to be equipped with the Iron Fist system from Elbit, but Army say that the mission profile for the vehicles means that will no longer required.” This tracks with Boxer shifting from combat reconnaissance vehicle to battlegroup support vehicle. This shift from frontline rearward relates to vehicle performance shortcomings, apparently. Lance also reportedly has issues with toxicity in the turret, something Army last experienced with Scorpion turreted M113s. From the ABC article: “Military insiders claim Rheinmetall's Boxer is experiencing "carbon monoxide toxicity" inside the vehicle, vibration problems for passengers…”
  21. 2805662
    Related. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-04-06/multi-billion-dollar-army-vehicle-project-facing-cutbacks/100968910
  22. 2805662
    Announcement of the decision kicked into the long grass.
  23. 2805662
    Agreed.
  24. 2805662
    Your mates are saying Redback won? Nice.
  25. 2805662
    Got the cart before the horse. Alleged - yes rumoured - noise, vibration, & unreliability issues during RMA, hence the commonwealth direction to try the Soucy rubber tracks.
×
×
  • Create New...