Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

China MIRVs DF-5

Recommended Posts


Taking bets on how long it takes India to announce similar capability.


If we go by how long it took to "develop" the INSAS and Arjun..... Wouldn't put too much faith in it before the sun goes supernova.


At least it will have some amazing design defects such as pre maturely ejecting some of the mirvs back into your own territory that only the Indian arms industry can pull off though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a more serious note, this is a rather odd development, China is usually extremely secretive about anything to do with their Nuclear programs, Military or Civil (If you go there as a foreigner, don't even talk about it,) plus they only have as many warheads on hand as they need to have an effective deterrent as opposed to a M.A.D. sized arsenal like the USA and USSR during the Cold War. Although this is a rather unpredictable number, as due to the high secrecy talked about before, the exact amount of nuclear warheads China currently has stockpiled isn't even 100% known to anyone outside the country's very higher ups, it's often estimated to be anywhere from 250-500 warheads however depending on which sources you want to "trust". They also have a strict "no first use" policy in place so I do wonder why this is being brought to light now. (or, I guess it's the pentagon bringing it to light but, I digress.)


Basically, they've never really put much into MIRVs because, as for the reasons listed above, they've never had to, simply the threat of dropping even a single 5 MT warhead on, say, Tokyo if Japan/It's allies get too close for comfort would normally be enough for the deterrent factor. According to this nifty little website, http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/a single 5 MT airblast over Tokyo (the size of the current single warhead on the DF-5) would result in 4 million immediate deaths and 9 million injuries, and obviously countless billions in destruction. 6 million dead and 8 billion injured for New Delhi, India and around the same for Mumbai, who also isn't exactly on good terms with China as said before. But, with missile shields getting more advanced and being able to shoot down a single re entry vehicle more easily then ever as stated in the article, I guess this is the big reason that MIRV deployment and possibly future use in SLBMs is now seen as needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The deterrence value of MIRVed nukes is weird, because there's a school of thought that holds them as encouraging a first counterforce strike by putting many eggs into relatively few baskets. But now with ABM focusing on the sort of thing that would kill one RV rather than having a good chance at messing up all the RVs from the same bus, their value for saturating defenses is higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Picture time, Some photos of the DF-5B (The MIRV variant) have been revealed over the past couple months, usually in sections.




Upper and lower stages being transported separately.




Note the change in nose shape compared to the DF-5, this allows up to 8 re entry vehicles to be fitted.


When the DF-5B is in full service (if it isn't already, China doesn't exactly say much about it's nuclear tech), It should be second to only the DF-41 in capability and just ahead of the DF-31B as far as their ICBM models go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Monochromelody
      The Al Khalid derived from Norinco Type 90IIM MBT. It was in the early 90s, when India started to test their Arjun MBT. Pakistanis looked for a MBT design that could be produced by herself. 
      Norinco provided their own Type 90IIM prototype, this is an MBT design which comprised many Western components, such as engine and transmission. 

      There were 4 prototypes for Al-Khalid development, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. 
      P1 has a Chinese tank diesel engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission. 
      P2 has a British Perkins CV12 Condor diesel engine with French SESM ESM500 transmission. 
      P3 has a Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 2-cycle boxer engine with its own twin planetary gearbox. 
      P4 has a German MB871 engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission, similar to South Korean K1 MBT. 

      Norinco and Pakistanis planned to adopt one of the Western powerpack at first, but due to CoCom (Coordinating Committee for Export to Communist Countries) restrictions, China is under embargo, which means China would not import weapons form Western countries. Obviously P3 powerplant would be the only choice. All those descriptions on the internet about ESM500 in Al-Khalid is fatally wrong. 
      The Al-Khalid pre-production batch and production version all equipped with Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 powerpack.
      It is an extremely compact design, the engine laid transversely in engine room, twin planetary gearboxes connect to both left and right end. The 6TD-2 has two crankshafts: the front one drives the mechanical supercharger, while the rear one drives the gearboxes. The cooling system covering the whole engine room, the engine itself has no mechanical connection to the cooling system, and the cooling system doesn't need mechanical drive. The cooling system based on a unique principle: exhaust gas driven ejector. The exhaust gas from the engine is injected through the outlet ducting, produce a low pressure in the outlet side, that will suck in cold air from the inlet side. This principle is also used in the T-64, T-80UD and T-84, but as far as I know, Swedish Ikv 91 is the only western tank that have similar cooling principle. 
      As a result, the total length of powerpack is significantly shortened, much more shorter than the European powerpack mentioned above. This leads to a spare storage room between the fighting compartment and the engine compartment. This storage is for extra ammunition and fuel, when turret points 3 or 9 o'clock, the top cover of the storage could be opened from outside, containing 10 rounds for main gun, with projectiles on the outsides, semi-combustible charges on the inside.
      The data table from HIT also describe the ammunition capacity as 39+10, means that 22 ready rounds in the T-72 type carousel autoloader, 17 backup rounds scatter around the fighting compartment, and extra 10 rounds could be carried in the storage room. 
      The driver of Al-Khalid control the vehicle via steering wheel and an automatic gear control box. The steering wheel and gear control box send electrical signals to the computer, then computer control the hydraulic servo actuator to perform engage and disengage of brakes and clutches, making steering and gear changes, as well as adjusting the speed and torque of the engine.
      Mechanically the gearboxes are nearly the same as T-64s and T-72s, but have different side reducer unit. The KMDB side reducer unit is designed as a secondary gearbox, acting like a forward-reverse selector. When both reducers were put into reverse, the vehicle can reverse using the normal forward ranges. From 1st gear to 4th gear, all could be used as high speed reverse, and that's why KMDB said this is a 7F4R gearbox system. And if only one reducer was put into reverse, the track will be driving in opposites direction, causing the vehicle turns within its tracks, a.k.a. pivot steer or center steer. T-84 also applied this driving and steering system.  
      The advantages of Al-Khalid's powerpack is the versatility: all 3 types of MBT in the Pakistanis arsenal, T-80UD, T-84, Al-Khalid, share the same engine and gearbox. 
    • By Akula_941
      Anti-air bobcat design to take away driver's hearing in maximum efficiency

      SH11  155mm SPG

    • By Sturgeon
      Strategic Air Command (dot com) shows us:

      I once did some contracting work assisting with a rocket test fire in an Atlas silo. IIRC, they are smaller than the later Titan silos.
    • By Belesarius
      New high velocity 125mm tank gun reportedly starting testing for the Chinese military.  Not surprised that the data disappeared off the university website at all.
      Edit: 125mm/60? oO
  • Create New...