That’s Suspicious

1 minute ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

 

I suppose so.  Ian seemed to like it well enough in his Forgotten Weapons video where he fired one.  I suppose it's a better option than a pistol.   How many grease guns were US tanks equipped with?  I seem to remember reading that during the Iraq war that US tankers only had two M4 carbines per vehicle, meaning two of the crew had to use pistols if they were operating dismounted.  Am I remembering this correctly?

I remember speaking with a M1 crewman who said the same thing. He also said it just depends on the crew. 

20 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

It's a minecraft joke.

Let’s stop now.

On 3/9/2018 at 8:11 PM, EnsignExpendable said:

Turret down position.

 

What a wonderful memorial. 

1 hour ago, Collimatrix said:

Does anyone have any idea to how thick the diagonal sections of the mantlet are? 

3 hours ago, Jägerlein said:

I fear it`s not the author`s fault: http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/arjun-tanks-new-powerful-ammo-developed-by-drdo-labs-in-pune/

Oh so it’s just India.

On 3/1/2018 at 5:52 PM, Ramlaen said:

BAE Systems has submitted its proposal to the U.S. Army to build and test the Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) vehicle for use by the Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT).

 

Its really sad to be honest. It’s like that old dog at the pound that’s been there for a few years that’s not been put down yet, hoping for someone to come get him 😞

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjun_(tank)

So I was browsing on Wikipedia to see what was being written on certain tanks, anyone care to click specifications and read into the special ammo the Arjun uses? It’s uhhhh..... pretty cool....................

(I’m on a phone therefore I can’t post a screenshot.)

Edit - Whoever wrote what you’ll see, did it multiple times throughout that article.

3 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Well, i completely forgot about what North Korean tanks with all their grenade launchers and ATGMs launchers on top of their turrets reminded me until today...

 

 

 

But hey! It goes even deeper!

Thats from Endwar right?

3 hours ago, Serge said:

And, we must quote those armored logistic box :

Considered, but not purchase (like all good ideas we have)

To me, it still looks good. I don’t think a whole lot can really make the Leclerc look ugly.

2 minutes ago, SH_MM said:

Jordan to retire the Challenger 1, but keep the M60.

 

http://www.janes.com/article/78095/jordan-restructures-its-armoured-formations

 

I can’t wait to try it in War Thunder. 

2 hours ago, DogDodger said:

Great. Now my eye's twitching again.

How do you think I felt, I began having an  aneurysm when I saw how large the group was.

Just to let you guys know, there’s a Facebook group called “The M113 Interest Group.” that has 4.1k members and they only post pictures and talk about the Gavin.

Wow can you really not add photos through a phone?

Self Propelled Autism

The North Korean's already had a better Armata.

14 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

On otvaga forum members think that it is Iranian upgraded version of sight from Slovenian "Fotona" company.

 

   Also, more footage. In the middle part you can see a bit more about sights of the tank and RCWS. RCWS sight can move in limited arc, separe from where HMG is facing.

   Some thoughts: at first when Karrar was shown i and many people on Russian military-related forums assumed that this was UVZ-aided developed "Iranian" T-90MS or simply re-painted MS, that was done as part of UVZ attempt to sell their product to Iran using refreshed relationships after Russian operation in Syria begun. Cooler heads on this forum like SH_MM pointed out that it was more likely to be Iranian attempt to make their own upgrade for T-72S or just a PR stunt.

   GurKhan things that it was made in attempt to use it as a pressure during "probable" UVZ-Iran negotiations to buy T-90MS tanks. There is alo another version that Karrar is product that Iranian industry will use to secure internal AFV market by not giving UVZ free access ("why we need to be T-90MS from Russians if we can make basically same vehicle here on our own?"). Third view is that this vehicle is attempt to catch-up with other nations in the region in terms of AFV capabilities.

 

lol, Britain still uses the Chieftain apparently. 

They actually did a ok job, they even went as far as trying to copy the headlights. 

8 hours ago, Khand-e said:

Holy Christ that doesn't even bother to try and look remotely convincing.

"How do we make ZSU vismod Sensei?" 

"Get that tall table from the lobby."

6 hours ago, SH_MM said:

I fail to see any similarities. The G5 resembles the US AMPV much more than any T-64-based vehicle.

Edit:

 

Puma

My point is that it still looks ugly as shit.

6 minutes ago, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

Like in their porn? Then yes. 

Eghhhhhhh.....

10 hours ago, SH_MM said:

 

This looks like someone saw a Ukrainian T-64 APC converted monster, and took a huge shit all over it.

1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:

T-90As during exercices.

That's a pretty angry looking Russian.

Do we have any good info on the 2T Stalker? It seems like a interesting vehicle. 

I'm still finding new and weird threads, nonetheless poor thing  Must be a lot of misinterpretation if someone say's "She was killed by a duck."

I just found a Forgotten Weapons meme page and I am not disappointed......