Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Molota_477

Contributing Members
  • Content Count

    180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Molota_477

  1. I found it in Chinese forum and someone guests that it was from a patent doc,but I cant find any clue.
  2. Thanks a lot, I think that LKZ should choose the Arena and plan for 299,which can be found in the model.
  3. Bad news to me . It seems that I still have to wait for a longtime before I see the real face of Nota. By the way I am very curious about why not Russian guys disclose some details about Nota but care the Ukrainian secret protect's security, if Russian also have some unspeakable secret controlled in Ukrainian? So there was a consensus between Rus and Ukrainian that they would keep the words about their super tanks program,-) Well,,above isn't the points,I would like to ask some questions to confirm some relationships among those projects. 1. What you post before have said that the upgrade from 477/477a to Nota mainly because the new gun and ammunitions were required. And as we can see the magazine of 477 could only store the projectiles no longer than circa 800mm,but the new APFSDS under development like Grifel-1/2 (Im not sure and I also want to know if they have been used on 477a1)have been longer than 1000mm.So I think it may be the main reason of improving armment machine structure. Am I get it correctly? 2.Also I have no idea about why they developed new gun system as 2a73,did the LP-81 in 477 have anything wrong?And by the way,what is the relationship between 2a83 and LP-83?I cant find more information about them.So could you please introduce the thread of 152 smoothbore cannon? Thanks a lot here. 3.What type of FCS did 477 plan for?I think it should have the ability of Hunter-Killer with commander's independent thermal sight,which showed in photos,but I doubt that if the sight in the right of turret can have 360° field of version,because the objects on the turret roof and its slope may disturb the sight. 4.What type of APS did 477 plan for? some pictures in network show that it may be the Arena..but I think it.may not fit the turret shape of 477s. Thats all what I can not clear up,I will appreciate it if you can give me an answer!
  4. So I just wait for the photos of 477A1 which was redesigned and had three carousels loading system.
  5. Chinese modern tank development diagram by VTYZCX in http://zhuangjiacheliang.com http://zhuangjiacheliang.com/data/attachment/forum/201605/02/165259xzjbjjkzqjet00tz.jpg
  6. Does anyone know or get this document? 【 ''Véhicules blindés et tactiques '' par l'Ingénieur Général Bodin】about France armored vehicles,from a series of France defence books. I can only find two of them in Scribd,the part of Anti-tank missile and the part of AA Gun. https://fr.scribd.com/doc/225358343/38606186-COMHART-T10-Armements-Antichars-Missiles-Guides-Et-Non-Guides-France-2008
  7. Why does the tank magazine use carousel ammo storage combined with turret bustle autoloader ? The ammunition in turret bustle seems have no available armor protection. ?_?
  8. AFAIK they were started by the kpz90/char90 ,the France and German joint project. But German concept seems only a flat turret leopard2,while the France have prepared a number of innovative concepts.
  9. The first pic upper part shows the failure rate of equipments' Square Team which were reviewed in front of Tianan men last year and below shows the failure rate of equipment types.Both two forms show that the 99a, 05a and 04a afvs' fault times still higher than other equipments. The first form index:(from left to right) tanks; AAV; IFV; IFV(airborne);AT missile launcher; 155 SPG; type 11 wheeled tanks; 4x4 assault cars; 4x4 assault cars (used by armed police); SP-AA Gun; and others are missile system... the second form index just the types. The second pic is about the failure rate of parts of 99a. from up to low: operation system transmission system electric system engine system other system suspection system hydraulic system
  10. Extraordinarily interesting, i really wanna know the source of this image,can someone please tell me the book's name or magazine? thanks a lot here .
  11. Still have some questions. What type of engine have been used on 477a1 and 477A? I wonder whether all the 477 were built in Ukraine while the 477a and A1 were built in Russia.
  12. Well,what a complicated process. Without using PC,I drew a brief pic about that,I'm not sure whether it closes to the true or not. http://zhuangjiacheliang.com/data/attachment/forum/201605/02/222640ruxrgtxtuktuunus.jpg%22%5Dhttp://zhuangjiacheliang.com/data/attachment/forum/201605/02/222640ruxrgtxtuktuunus.jpg'>http://zhuangjiacheliang.com/data/attachment/forum/201605/02/222640ruxrgtxtuktuunus.jpg"]http://zhuangjiacheliang.com/data/attachment/forum/201605/02/222640ruxrgtxtuktuunus.jpg[/url]
  13. Thanks! The only problem is how did the auto loader in the turret nacelle select the type of ammunition ? Is it because the sector belt loop structure?
  14. In my view,the autoloader of 477A/A1/2 which was consisted by three carousels is incomprehensible . The crews in tank should be very unsafe.... So,I think the original 477's AZ was better than the later one,at least the most of ammunitions were separated from crews.. By the way,I am very curious about the loading system's structure of 477,especially the part in the turret basket.
  15. It should be the 2A83 Gun TestBed,which would be mount on obj195. As we can see the two sides of this turret were covered by steel plates as clump weight. This construction only reflected in the obj 195's unmanturret. Moreover,AFAIK there is not any exact information about the obj477A1 had equiped with 2A83 gun.
×
×
  • Create New...