Andrei_bt
-
Posts
174 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Andrei_bt
-
-
Quote
And I fully agree whit this above. No special armour in corner - just turret roof.
It is nothing but an opinion, better to find some internal photos or drawings. If so it is rather "strange" design.
-
Omsk KMDB antitandem ERA design -
Planned mostly for T-80U upgrades -
http://btvtinfo.blogspot.com/2018/03/blog-post_46.html
(in russian)
-
well there are well known photos showing the same STB hull as T-72A
-
-
-
Russian patent for 4C23 (for Relikt) tile -
-
-
6 hours ago, Akula_941 said:
in short, people crys, shouting , cursing, claiming this whole file is fake, Abrams 900mm vs KE,DU stronk, USA win.
any link? Will be funny to look )
-
-
Ohhh Leclerc )))
KE ~ 500
CE ~ 600
It war Sweedish resarch gives
-
Great news for Warthunder )))) Too bad it lucks Challenger
-
Well, every tank has a gun mask to fit the gun. And it's a week zone. Welded turret is the same.
-
-
sude armor 60+100+45 at upper purts and 60 at lower.
- That_Baka, Met749 and Molota_477
-
2
-
1
-
it's an object 450 competitor, less advanced project used as a backup for a turetless 450.
480 had several modifications - a new chassis (as shown on the page) and T-80-style chassis.
general design is same as T-64 - new hull design (like on Leopard-2), new turret - predecessor of T-80UD turret,
integrated APS (future arena) like on 478M or dikobraz (drozd) on turret sides.
Very powerfull armour - side hull used combine armor, turret is better in protection than that of T-80U.
Ut was planned with opanoramic sight for commander, Agat as an option.
23 mm R-23M gun on turret, future design of installation of the gun used for Oplot.
and a lot of other
-
-
I uppose not completely true, as HMG (or AGL) system is also attached to turret roof, strange (((
-
-
On 21.01.2018 at 1:16 PM, Mighty_Zuk said:
If we put aside the strong propaganda vibe this site gives, the info is really pretty basic.
Your understanding of this is "pretty basic" as it was a parody to US and WW2 posters which someone take too seriously.
-
---No, it is not fake.
Fake for brainless . If you stand in front of RPG or ATGM attack near tank ERA is lesser of problems.
--- On older ERA types like Kontakt-1, Kontakt-5, ERAWA, Brenus and Blazer, the metal fragments will spread in a 90-120°
totally ungraunded
---After traveling approximateely three metres, the After traveling approximateely three metres, the fragments still can punch through the reference plate (aluminium armor) still can punch through the reference plate (aluminium armor)
Fragments of what type of ERA? If you standing 3 m close to RPG (ATGM )))) ) it is not lesser chance to be a victim for RPG (ATGM) fragments or blast impact.
So all this is just a fake ungrounded and biased marketing.
Well...
A lot of recent advcertisement of euro - APS, but this says more than words -
-
---- yet it was never adopted due to the increased danger for nearby infantry (a result of the metal fragments thrown formed by the ERA flyer plates upon penetration).
Definetely fake reason.
-
-
225 -
-
Polish Armoured Vehicles
in Mechanized Warfare
Posted
Hull and turret... must... ceramic blocks.
You can not imagine hoe much work and resources (money, science, technology) must be invested into a new armor.
Dozens of turrets firing trials, introduction of new casting/ I suppose the things you highlighted is desires.