Andrei_bt
-
Posts
174 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Andrei_bt
-
-
Glorious T-15 HIFV with "spaceship" level battle module -
6 channel commander sight
5 chanell for gunner sight
4 target autotracking
IFF
"Dual" mode etc
https://c.radikal.ru/c24/1801/a1/23e513eceef2.jpg
https://b.radikal.ru/b17/1801/00/0bc757c63044.jpg
-
-
5 hours ago, LoooSeR said:
https://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/669671.html
I guess militarysta again finding this somwhere under his chair or something...
http://paralay.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?p=563673#p563673
or this is a source?
More:
this https://weibo.com/u/5623720054?is_hot=1#_rnd1515079144470
-
Full description and manual for MBT-2000 FCS (in Russ)
-
On 15.12.2017 at 7:06 PM, LoooSeR said:
?
posted by Militarysta
-
--- found by Met749 on a polish forum
-
VNII Transmash opinion on general technical level of Russian and Nato (US) tanks -
(it is so called general level of combat edffeciency)
-
Soviet study of weekened zones of tanks...
http://btvt.info/5library/vbtt_1974_06_oslablennie_zoni.htm
and research of a new combined armor (later used in T-80U and T-80UD protection)
'
+ 60% effectivness on CE vs steel with a same LOS
(on serial models it was increased)
-
I did not posted this, it's Gur Khan in my FB
-
-
It's hard to tell if almot none photos availible ))
-
-
Patents are official and open, no " leaked patent" , just some rtds from one highly patriotic forum decided that 38 NII patent on hypotetical APS concept is Afghanit.
-
1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:
Afganit is belived to use EFPs warheads in it's interceptors, not a fragmentation to hit incoming projectiles. Also, Afganit's hard kill system can't do shit against top attack munitions, thats why there is an extensive soft-kill system in development/developed for Armata/Kurganets/Boomerang.
That patent has nothing common with Afghanit and patented by another organization.
-
"To Moscow".
Then he sunk russian aircraft carrier in Helicopter simulator
-
It does not lok like ERA
-
- Collimatrix and Bronezhilet
-
2
-
-
- That_Baka and Belesarius
-
2
-
-
On 27.06.2017 at 4:54 PM, LoooSeR said:
Another art
Great art!
Dozen ot them are stored here - (UPI190)
(behind the T-80s under the cover... of course no photos possible for now.
-
2002 armor show for military officials.
some historical vechiocles, some in service now
-
Kubinka testing ground (former 38 Research Institute)
https://btvtinfo.blogspot.com/2017/07/blog-post_32.html
-
Soviet study of U M46 tank.
Very detailed (in russian) . But general conclussion briefely -
poor tank, week protection, low mobility, big profile, bif but very uncomfortable... " seriously behind domestic tanks of the same period of time"
http://btvt.info/5library/vbtt_1953_03_m46.htm
Communist tracked boxes with pancake turrets: don't you dare to confuse GLORIOUS T-80 battle tank with Kharkovite T-64 tractor that doesn't work.
in Mechanized Warfare
Posted
From UKBTM article -
Эффективно решают задачу стрельбы с настильной траекторией снаряды с дистанционным подрывом. Для пушек типа Д-81 такие снаряды разработаны в рамках ОКР «Айнет».
Разработанные снаряды превосходят снаряды 3ОФ26 по зоне поражения открыто расположенной живой силы, соответственно, в 4–13 раз!
Эффективность выстрелов с дистанционным подрывом на в 5−7 раз выше, чем у серийных осколочно-фугасных снарядов 3ОФ26.
Все Т-90 и Т-90А оснащены комплексом «Айнет», позволяющим работать указанными выстрелами.
http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/uvz.htm
They say it's up to 4-13 more effective vs troops
From Oplot manual - more mmodest nimbers
Выстрелы с осколочно-фугасным снарядом типа "Р" и "С" по устройству аналогичны штатному выстрелу с осколочно-фугасным снарядом, но эффективная зона поражения выше чем штатных ОФС снарядов при стрельбе:
снарядом типа "Р" по открыто расположенной живой силе и легкобронированной технике в два раза;
снарядом типа "С" по открыто расположенной живой силе в четыре раза.