Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Serge

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by Serge

  1. I ask myself if this turret request the same Dorchester Level F up armor than the genuine one.
  2. So, the rear ramp door can open even when upside down.
  3. https://twitter.com/AMBLE_Baltic/status/1167066364080795649?s=20
  4. Interesting : https://www.snafu-solomon.com/2019/08/idf-carmel-armored-fighting-vehicle.html?m=1
  5. It’s a little bit more complex. Ignition of a shell is not simple. The tube focuses the explosion to a request direction. So I’m not sure the turret will suffer damage.
  6. Because military platform are balanced. They’re not devoted to dozing. They must be able to do others tasks too. One reason of the efficiency of lighter tractors can come from the difference of bucket.
  7. The Leclerc chassis won’t be used. The French problem is the stupid faith in the « wheels only platform doctrine » starting in 1987. So today, we don’t have tracked platform. I don’t know the future but the best AEV considered by French engineers is the Terrier MSV.
  8. Yes. But heavy barrel’s thermal sleeve must be kept light. The goal is to reach an homogeneous temperature around the barrel. The barrel case of the Lance turret help to keep the temperature homogeneous.
  9. Lynx platform can’t be used for the MGCS. The concept is not stabilised enough to quote anything. On the other hand : - there is a place for an other solution than the MGCS ; - there are opportunities for a « light » tank. Around 40t. This way, RLS can adapt its Lynx.
  10. From Japan ? Look at the weight simulators on the turret. They are not symmetrical.
×
×
  • Create New...