Collimatrix Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 I can't have D.E. Watters, who is an actual researcher and stuff, reading my usual grade of gibberish and nonsense. Now I have to put actual effort into my posts.Everyone here knows how much I hate effort. This is terrible. SuperComrade, LoooSeR, D.E. Watters and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted December 10, 2014 Report Share Posted December 10, 2014 Maybe D. E. Watters will tell us all about that one time Martin Fackler said he didn't exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted December 11, 2014 Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 Who is that Watters, and why collimatrix post was liked by some D.E. Watters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collimatrix Posted March 11, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE Sturgeon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 Oh hey! Hognose is here! Hi Hognose! Welcome to our humble forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hognose Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 It is I, Arthur, King of the -- oh, never mind. Nothing to see here, just Hognose from Weaponsman. The only reason anything at all is accurate over there is that Daniel E. Watters upbraids me when I step on my weapons-history equipment with hockey skates on. I just found this site (well, Collimatrix posted in my comments and I tailed him back here using my peerless ASO skills, and the fact that he left the link, but mostly the fact that he left the link). I was considering this for the Wednesday Weapons Website of the Week at Weaponsman (we like alliteration) but dunno if you want to be called out. The signal to noise ratio here is outstanding. Sturgeon and Belesarius 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 Hognose, I'm really humbled by the compliment. I've been following your website for a long time, and though not all the content is up my alley, I've found much of it to be invaluable.That's really my goal here - to keep the site content-dense. We're still new (the majority of the members are still the original cadre who split off from another forum, so we've all been posting together for much longer than this site's been around), but we're looking to expand with new members who can contribute. At the end of the day, I have control over the site (I'm the Admin and only moderator so far), so I don't expect that exposing our forum to your readership could have an irreversible negative effect. If you think you'd be opening the floodgates to the unwashed heathen hordes by doing so, then please don't, but otherwise I don't see a problem with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xthetenth Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I would like to think that we have soap. (The question is of course the quantity of soap) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donward Posted March 12, 2015 Report Share Posted March 12, 2015 I would like to think that we have soap. (The question is of course the quantity of soap) Relevant. https://youtu.be/I_oaTP_oRsc It is I, Arthur, King of the -- oh, never mind. Nothing to see here, just Hognose from Weaponsman. The only reason anything at all is accurate over there is that Daniel E. Watters upbraids me when I step on my weapons-history equipment with hockey skates on. I just found this site (well, Collimatrix posted in my comments and I tailed him back here using my peerless ASO skills, and the fact that he left the link, but mostly the fact that he left the link). I was considering this for the Wednesday Weapons Website of the Week at Weaponsman (we like alliteration) but dunno if you want to be called out. The signal to noise ratio here is outstanding. Welcome Hognose. It's always good to have someone here that makes Collimatrix's legs turn rubbery. Please don't take away my obsolete iron sights! They're all I've got! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collimatrix Posted March 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2015 It is I, Arthur, King of the -- oh, never mind. Nothing to see here, just Hognose from Weaponsman. The only reason anything at all is accurate over there is that Daniel E. Watters upbraids me when I step on my weapons-history equipment with hockey skates on. I just found this site (well, Collimatrix posted in my comments and I tailed him back here using my peerless ASO skills, and the fact that he left the link, but mostly the fact that he left the link). I was considering this for the Wednesday Weapons Website of the Week at Weaponsman (we like alliteration) but dunno if you want to be called out. The signal to noise ratio here is outstanding. Hope that you have some time to post here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.