Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sign in to follow this  
LostCosmonaut

Russia Plans to Launch Nuclear Weapons at Asteroid in 2036

Recommended Posts

Link here (comments section is terminally stupid)

 

Nuclear deflection seems like a pretty good idea for objects of this size. Even if you don't break it up, you can still detonate it standoff and change the velocity quite a bit, which is good enough.  Also, nuclear deflection is about the only thing we have right now that we can use with a lead time less than several years.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, I personally think Damocloids are just as dangerous as NEOs.

 

  • Weird orbits mean that they'll come from out of the ecliptic, where we have less telescopes looking
  • Really dark and hard to see
  • Absurdly high relative velocities due to retrograde orbits

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never got the concern that nuking asteroids would just create a bunch of tiny asteroids. Wouldn't tiny asteroids mostly disintegrate when they enter the atmosphere?

It depends. Smaller ones gnash get get caught in the orbit can cause hazards to shuttles and satellites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never got the concern that nuking asteroids would just create a bunch of tiny asteroids. Wouldn't tiny asteroids mostly disintegrate when they enter the atmosphere? 

 

Yes. Some people on other websites (ah dot com) who are bad at math think that all those asteroids entering Earth's atmosphere. However, I did a bit of quick math. Earth's atmosphere has a mass of about 5*10^18 kg, and the Chicxulub impactor deposited about 10^21 J of force energy. Using the specific heat value for 300 Kelvin air, you get a net heating of about 1/4 degree (assuming the entire energy of the impactor gets transferred to the atmosphere as heat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By LostCosmonaut
      Something I haven't seen discussed on this site before; Soviet/Russian efforts to domesticate foxes by breeding for domesticated behavior. Article in Scientific American here; https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/mans-new-best-friend-a-forgotten-russian-experiment-in-fox-domestication/
       
      Interesting that there were physical changes correlated with the behavioral changes the Russians bred for.

       
      Buy one for only $7,000! https://domesticatedsilverfox.weebly.com/aquiring-a-tame-fox.html
       

      (not entirely unlike a dog I guess)
       
       
      It seems like a pretty cool idea to drunk me, though I don't have a spare 7,000 dollars laying around (thanks student loans!). Also, I don't think my cat would approve.
       
    • By Sturgeon
      Strategic Air Command (dot com) shows us:
       

       
      I once did some contracting work assisting with a rocket test fire in an Atlas silo. IIRC, they are smaller than the later Titan silos.
    • By LostCosmonaut
      https://fas.org/blogs/security/2015/05/china-mirv/
      Taking bets on how long it takes India to announce similar capability.
    • By LostCosmonaut
      This thread is for discussion of ICBM basing options, as outlined in the linked paper (written in 1980).
       
      While some of them seem absurd (dirigible basing!), others appear to be more realistic.
×
×
  • Create New...