Priory_of_Sion

8 hours ago, Lord_James said:

Anyone want to have a raffle on the next questionably responsible country to develope nuclear weapons? 

 

My vote is for either Venezuela or Egypt. 

$5 on Turkey 

2 hours ago, Ulric said:

 

Not all rectangles are squares, but all squares are rectangles, you know?

 

Not all Muslims are terrorists, but quite a bit of terrorism is perpetrated by radical Islamists.

 

Not all lefties are crazed gunmen, but a fair number of crazed gunmen happen to be on the left side of the spectrum. The shootings are usually not politically motivated, either. The issue that comes into play here is that every time there is a shooting, the vast majority of main stream media comes out with conjecture and misinformation as to the perpetrators political alignment and affiliations. After the theater shooting in Aurora, the media went digging through Tea Party records and found someone with a similar name to the shooter, picked it up and ran with it. Turns out, it was some fucked up college kid who went off his meds (which is a trait that shows up more than once, by the way). Then they play the blame game and go on parade pointing fingers at every conservative and pro gun organization that they can find. The left leaning media paints anyone who disagrees with them on gun control with the broad brush of things such being complicit with or even guilty by association of murdering children on national TV. If you want to talk about intellectual dishonesty and blanket discrimination, start there.

 

PS, more examples.

 Ebay, Google, and other major players on the online world harassing, banning, blocking, demonetizing, censoring or in other ways suppressing opinions that dissent from their left leaning world view. I know of businesses that have had their Ebay account frozen because there we selling slings that could be used on AR-15s. That was the day that I learned that, according to Ebay's customer service department, it is AGAINST THE LAW!!!! to sell slings for "Assault Rifle 15s" on Ebay. Dating sites have shadow banned people who have pictures of firearms in their profile. Google suppresses search results that are against their ideology. Twitter is confirmed to be shadow banning conservatives based on certain algorithms. YouTube constantly goes after conservatives, and they have started shutting down channels that feature firearms. These are companies that have no business bringing up politics, but it seems to be at the very core of their modus operandi. Do you need more examples? The right has some bad apples for sure, but the left has orders of magnitude more, and they hold influential positions in society.

 

Also, do we know how many death threats Trump and his family have received?

The right political establishment's support (along with some left support) for the drug war, which is the cause of most gun crimes, is, in my opinion, to blame for most of the violence we see. Crazed gunmen, wether politically active or not, are a statistical anomaly.  Maybe getting stoned would help a lot of those freaks out too? 

Sounds like there are structural problems in the capitalist-controlled silicon valley that is rewarding left-wing views in order to pander to a certain market over another. 

The only president that probably never got death threats was Old Tippecanoe because he had the sense to give himself pneumonia and die immediately after winning his election. 

Really weird article, but I wouldn't call it pro-pedophilia per se (I also agree Salon deleting it is scumy and, to agree with Bele, Salon shouldn't really be read with anymore conviction than The Federalist) and isn't Milo still around too despite him being, you know, a pedo? 

For the record, the right only probably has like 5 people that still want mass conversion therapy as a govt policy. We like to make strawmen out of our political opponents, it is fun and easy to do. Don't? 

Where has the left, beyond like 5 crazy people, come out to support pedophilia? 

9 minutes ago, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

normalize pedophiles

Alternatively:

Yeah, the Skokie Affair is an interesting event that saw Jewish lawyers defend neo-Nazis. Also, I'd imagine if a neo-Nazi led state fought a new war against the US that we'd consider swastikas "fighting words" and thus illegal until they became irrelevant again. 

The public rally part is the important bit here regarding the FoS. I assume Canada voted for the same reason. Ukraine on the other hand, well.

44 minutes ago, Donward said:

When was the last time the British AND the French were with us on one of these ventures?

 

Gulf War in 1991?

Libya 7 years ago was mainly French & British strikes at first 

11 minutes ago, Ramlaen said:

 

Probably the French if this is true

Edit: Or:

Afghanistan using their Supe Tuces 

Houthis launched another salvo of scuds at Riyadh. Conflicting reports wether Saudi Patriot batteries seemed to have actually downed the scuds, but there’s video of a Patriot malfunctioning and hitting the city itself. 

1 hour ago, Xoon said:

 

Though I can't really find anything extraordinary about the Panzer 61 or 68.

 

 

 

They had somewhat less width than the Centurion and Leopard 1, apparently good for going through alpine tunnels. 

3 minutes ago, Xoon said:

General question, has there ever been AFVs or tanks built for fighting in mountainous terrain? 

Wasn't the Chinese ZTQ designed for this (I see Serge posted about it before I finished typing)? I also believe much of Japan's modern AFVs considered the country's hilly terrain in their development. Wouldn't be surprised if the Swiss Panzer 61 and 68 also took this into account 

Yep, but at least the white kinda works with the leo in the snow 

UN-white Leclercs just look off

6 hours ago, MrCatKK said:

Nice meme, why destroy someone's feeling?

Anyone who talks like this belongs in an asylum 

Snapper hanging out inside a dear carcass 

Read it over Christmas. I’m not that knowledgeable on the Great War so I can’t say that I spotted any inaccuracies or strange interpretations of events. I have the same reservation for Hastings as you, but the book was like $5 so I picked it up.