Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Renegade334

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    358
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    48

Reputation Activity

  1. Metal
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    > U.S. Department of Defense > Contract
     
    What would the "high-energy cannon system" be? Rh130 samples for testing?
  2. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Clan_Ghost_Bear in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    > U.S. Department of Defense > Contract
     
    What would the "high-energy cannon system" be? Rh130 samples for testing?
  3. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Stimpy75 in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.   
    Yeah, all three crew members are in a capsule at the front of the hull - it's not like the PzH2000 where a loader is still needed inside the turret to manually load propellant charge(s). That autoloader arm swings 90° downwards to fetch the shell (positioned vertically on the centerline by a robotic cradle that collects rounds from the left- and right-side hull vertical carousels), aligns itself with the breech, rams the shell into the chamber then shifts downwards so that the MACS propellant charge(s) can be rammed in, too.
     
    On the XM2001, the 26 or so storage tubes in the turret bustle contained 208 MACS propellant charges, i.e. 8 per tube. Those could be robotically resupplied by the feeding boom of the XM2002 RSV, which connected to a hatch built into the back of the turret and fed the ammo through it without the need for a crewmember to step out for assistance and/or supervision. All of that could be done with both vehicle crews buttoned down.
  4. Tank You
  5. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Laviduce in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.   
    Yeah, all three crew members are in a capsule at the front of the hull - it's not like the PzH2000 where a loader is still needed inside the turret to manually load propellant charge(s). That autoloader arm swings 90° downwards to fetch the shell (positioned vertically on the centerline by a robotic cradle that collects rounds from the left- and right-side hull vertical carousels), aligns itself with the breech, rams the shell into the chamber then shifts downwards so that the MACS propellant charge(s) can be rammed in, too.
     
    On the XM2001, the 26 or so storage tubes in the turret bustle contained 208 MACS propellant charges, i.e. 8 per tube. Those could be robotically resupplied by the feeding boom of the XM2002 RSV, which connected to a hatch built into the back of the turret and fed the ammo through it without the need for a crewmember to step out for assistance and/or supervision. All of that could be done with both vehicle crews buttoned down.
  6. Tank You
  7. Tank You
  8. Tank You
  9. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Clan_Ghost_Bear in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    Eyyy, finally!
     
     
  10. Tank You
  11. Metal
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    Eyyy, finally!
     
     
  12. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    Still waiting for a peek at that M10-derived MWRV that's supposedly at Booth 6027, possibly in the form of a small model/mockup...
     
     
     
    For the Army’s homecoming, GDLS comes out of the huddle with the StrykerQB
     
  13. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Cleb in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.   
    Army’s upcoming artillery strategy has ‘a big menu’ to choose from
     
     
     
    A few interesting things of note. It's not exactly a coincidence there's a L52 M109 at AUSA, given the revelations earlier this year that L58 ERCA had wear and tear issues. Someone smelled blood in the water...
     
    That said, I don't think the M109L52 has an autoloader, has it? Just manual loading?
  14. Tank You
  15. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    At least, it looks cleaner than the Bradley-based M-SHORAD aberration from 2017:
     

     
    A lot of robotics this year:
     
     
  16. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Ramlaen in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.   
    Army’s upcoming artillery strategy has ‘a big menu’ to choose from
     
     
     
    A few interesting things of note. It's not exactly a coincidence there's a L52 M109 at AUSA, given the revelations earlier this year that L58 ERCA had wear and tear issues. Someone smelled blood in the water...
     
    That said, I don't think the M109L52 has an autoloader, has it? Just manual loading?
  17. Tank You
  18. Tank You
  19. Tank You
    Renegade334 reacted to Clan_Ghost_Bear in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.   
    @Renegade334
    Doesn't sound like it does.

  20. Tank You
  21. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Clan_Ghost_Bear in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    This is what Nicholas "The Chieftain" Moran said about it on tanknet:
     
    One possibility is that that fiberglass portion of the hull was pulled out to make a separate exhibit showing the interior of the (optionally manned) crew capsule.
    Not too fond of a Thunderbird 2-like, swappable fuselage/hull module concept, though. It's a promissory note for structural headaches.
     
     
  22. Tank You
    Renegade334 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    This is what Nicholas "The Chieftain" Moran said about it on tanknet:
     
    One possibility is that that fiberglass portion of the hull was pulled out to make a separate exhibit showing the interior of the (optionally manned) crew capsule.
    Not too fond of a Thunderbird 2-like, swappable fuselage/hull module concept, though. It's a promissory note for structural headaches.
     
     
  23. Tank You
    Renegade334 reacted to Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    Sure looks like it's based on a Bradley.
  24. Tank You
  25. Tank You
    Renegade334 reacted to Clan_Ghost_Bear in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines   
    One more, from the Michigan Army ROTC Facebook page. Looks suspiciously like hatches on the hull front.
×
×
  • Create New...