2805662
-
Posts
692 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
53
Reputation Activity
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV
Required dimensions for L400-3:
-
2805662 got a reaction from SH_MM in StuG III Thread (and also other German vehicles I guess)
Detail of the Lance 1.0 turret’s commander’s sight retraction:
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV
An interesting change to the RFT Glossary has been released as an addenda (LAND 400 PHASE 3 – Mounted Close Combat Capability
RFT CASG/LSD/RFT0056/18 Addendum Number 04).
The definitions contained in an RFT Glossary are carefully written (& debated robustly internally) prior to RFT release, as this Glossary becomes contractually binding for the subsequent RMA, and potentially into the acquisition itself.
The change? The definition of “Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV)”!
From “means a highly protected and lethal AFV with excellent cross country mobility able to lift an armoured infantry section of no fewer than nine infantry soldiers, consisting of three crew and six dismounts, that can fight onto an enemy position. The IFV will have the lethality to destroy as a minimum equivalent threat AFV, air targets, and enemy dismounts operating behind fortified positions or cover. It will be a highly survivable platform with an improved ability to survive the first hits from direct fire weapons, blast and fragmentation and then continue the mission.”
To:
”means a Mission System that achieves aspects of the Mounted Close Combat Capability” (yep, no full stop)
Glad it’s not vague at all!
-
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
Huh. Australians Major General Kath Toohey & Brigadier Shane Gabriel front row in the left. At least they’re keeping up w/what the US Army is doing.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
Huh. Australians Major General Kath Toohey & Brigadier Shane Gabriel front row in the left. At least they’re keeping up w/what the US Army is doing.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Ramlaen in ATGMs and RPGs for infantry - a thread for rebels around the world to choose their ATGM supplier.
It was fun to play around with. The ACOG has a custom reticle with is even more simple than that fitted to the Russian RPG-7.
AirTronicUSA are also getting into the PG-7 rocket market.
-
2805662 got a reaction from FORMATOSE in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
M88A3 with hydro gas suspension.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
M88A3 with hydro gas suspension.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
M88A3 with hydro gas suspension.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
There was another Vehicle under a tarp at the GD stand....presumably the Griffon.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Ramlaen in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
There was another Vehicle under a tarp at the GD stand....presumably the Griffon.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Belesarius in Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV
Updated CV90 is out & about.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Ramlaen in Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV
Updated CV90 is out & about.
-
2805662 got a reaction from EnsignExpendable in Scale Models Megathread
Made some progress on my big Abrams.
Stencils + paint =
Name
Kangaroo & Army Registration Number:
-
2805662 got a reaction from Donward in Scale Models Megathread
Made some progress on my big Abrams.
Stencils + paint =
Name
Kangaroo & Army Registration Number:
-
2805662 got a reaction from Mighty_Zuk in Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV
Some answers provided by “the Commonwealth” to clarification questions on unmanned turrets & APS may be of interest.
On unmanned turrets:
“A tender proposing an unmanned turret would not be excluded, however,.... there is a high risk that an unmanned turreted IFV would not be shortlisted for Risk Mitigation Activity.”
On APS:
”Defence has not yet made a determination as to the preferred Active Protection System (APS) for Land 400 Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 program. Defence has however determined that a ‘curtain-style’ APS will not be pursued for these programs.”
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
Maybe something on the (remote?) turreted/RWS ACV 1.1?
-
2805662 got a reaction from Karamazov in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
Australian M1A1 refuels from a C-130.
-
-
-
-
2805662 got a reaction from SH_MM in StuG III Thread (and also other German vehicles I guess)
Boxer CRV with two armour hardnesses:
High Hardness Armour HHA500 “for hardness”.
Ultra-High Toughness UHT440 “for toughness”.
-
2805662 got a reaction from Serge in Britons are in trouble
Nothing the UK does with armour surprises me anymore 😢
-
2805662 got a reaction from Alzoc in Britons are in trouble
Challenger 2 Mark 2? Seriously? UK naming conventions are the worst.