Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

VPZ

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by VPZ

  1. No, it's also depends on dispersion of shells. I saw video where Pantzir tried to shoot down small UAV - it was pathetic.
  2. Nice. Such things as Tunguska's cannons are almost useless against small UAVs, while missiles have problems in destroying them too.
  3. There already was variant of ARV with small crane.
  4. https://www.facebook.com/Technology.IDF/posts/3041064092794002
  5. Too bad. He was the only insider in this thread, and one of the best on this forum.
  6. You can't say that for sure until you see this module.
  7. This damage caused by internal explosion. Merkava has SLERA armor, not primitive one like russian tanks.
  8. Frontal armor looks quite thick. You should know that Wiedzmin is just butthurting
  9. No. It's nice that there is the article about loses in 2 Lebanon war, but it's in Russian.
  10. Namer with Ofek-like satcom and Ofek with Namer-like armor.
  11. Yes, this vehicle lacks of side and rear cameras, it really doesn't have see through armor.
  12. LOL, there are cameras on the chassis.
  13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzzSwKgQDMA&feature=emb_title
  14. I read in some article that M1A3 will have both auto-loader and loader mainly for controlling robots. It was only one of variants, or another tank? Maybe this one (on the picture) is completely new, while the other is just an upgrade of Abrams. But this chassis on the picture looks like from Abrams.
×
×
  • Create New...