Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

David Moyes

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    41

Posts posted by David Moyes

  1. On 8/21/2018 at 8:09 PM, SH_MM said:

     

    ...

     


    Recently an Ares with a driver's hatch that opens at an angle has been photo'd:

    jFnpAHy.jpg
    DLNxcZD.jpg

    Switching to this new hatch might be the hold up.
    Otherwise it is hard to think of an issue that could be GD/Ajax related and not simply the MOD being dumb.
     

    On 8/21/2018 at 7:57 PM, 2805662 said:

     

     


    Matthew has also mentioned:
     

     

  2. The limitations of 8x8s, issusess that come from mixing tracks and wheels are well known about and discussed within the Army. However Gen. Carter, former Chief of the General Staff and current Chief of the Defence Staff is obsessed with acquiring an 8x8. Believing it necessary for any expeditionary force and inspired by the French intervention in Mali (despite most of the vehicles being VABs).
    He is the architect of the much maligned "Army 2020", a scheme so bad that practically everything has either been changed, cancelled or reversed multiple times.
    The original plan saw the main war-fighting division made up of 3 Armoured Brigades consisting of:

    1 x Recce (CVRT > Ajax)
    1 x MBT (CR2 mk.1 > mk.2)
    2 x IFV (Warrior > WCSP)
    1 x Heavy Protected Mobility (Mastiff > 8x8/Boxer)

    To justify an 8x8 purchase and a budget cut looming this was changed to 2 Armoured Brigades of:

    1 x MBT (CR2 mk.1 > mk.2)
    2 x IFV (Warrior > WCSP)
    2 x Light Infantry

    and 2 "Strike Brigades":

    1 x Recce (Ajax)
    1 x Direct Fire (Ajax acting as a "Medium Tank)
    2 x Mechanised Infantry (Boxer APC)
     

    Spoiler

    j0NeRJD.png


    Simply a mess. Early feedback is not good:

    6TiG6su.png

    Recently, the acknowledgement of Russia rearming and politicising of military cuts has resulted in the cancelling of any further cuts and a pledge for more funding from the Government. However the UK Gov. is an even bigger disaster so no one really knows what's going on.

  3. Boxer is supposed to replace most specialist vehicles in the fleet and be the basis for new ones. I would assume the total price would include some development funding of these.
    A version armed with Rheinmetalls RCH-155 has been talked about.

    Variants proposed 2006:

    Spoiler

    GtNPbJA.jpg

     

  4. 2 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

    If they prioritize modernization of Warriors over purchase of Boxers, preferring tracks over wheels, why not look at turning the Ajax into an IFV?


    Another possible option.
    GD have offered an Ajax-based IFV to the MOD before but price was the main issue.

     

    Army has only continued with WCSP because they fear losing the funding if it were to be cancelled.

    Currently GD and the MOD don't have a great relationship. Higher cost of a tracked IFV still persists.

  5. https://ted.europa.eu/TED/notice/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:314073-2018:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0

    400-600 Boxers procured through OCCAR.
    +900 option. Possible total 1500.
    4 variants plus driver training vehicles.

    Rumours:
    Initial variants are Command, APC, Ambulance and Mortar. 120mm mortars being evaluated.
    Repair & Recovery planned but could be dropped to save money. This could also happen to Ajax (Atlas + Apollo).
    If WCSP is cancelled then Boxer IFV is option. LMUK's 40mm turret has been fitted to Boxer and test fired, both cannon and Javelin.

    Brkt0yc.jpg
     

  6. 6 hours ago, Collimatrix said:

    Could Britain make MBTs now?  I don't think they can.


    UK still has a strong engineering base, various companies work on other nation's AFVs and produce componenets. New development in Titanium.
    It depends how indigenous it needs to be. High carbon Steel, transmission and gun would need to be imported.

    The UK government just has to be fully committed to the project.
    Which is the number 1 reason why it will never happen.

     

    6 hours ago, Collimatrix said:

    Should have license-produced Leo 2s or Leclercs or Abrams from day 1.


    Were suggested by officers along with Challenger 1 being armed with a L44.
    It seems many of the bad choices in UK AFV design can be traced back to Army leadership and Government rather than industry.

  7. Horstman InArm:
    https://horstmangroup.com/horstman-products/horstman-inarm/

    Used on Puma and many in-development/prototype AFVs.
     

    On 7/10/2018 at 8:38 PM, Walter_Sobchak said:

     

    It's been on the market forever.  Back in the 19790's, Teledyne Continental had a hydro suspension unit they tried marketing as part of the "Super M60" program.  I think this system is still available from L-3 Combat Propulsions, the current owner of the old Teledyne tank engine plant.  General Dynamics owned it for a while, so I was wondering if they were marketing the old system now owned by L-3 or something from someone else.  https://www2.l3t.com/cps/cps/Suspensions.htm


    Related?
    http://www.horstmaninc.com/news/horstman-acquires-l-3-communications-electronic-systems-suspension-unit

×
×
  • Create New...