Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Czechoslovak interwar bits


Recommended Posts

Very rare original tankette MU-4 from Lešany museum which was by some miracle preserved and after the war used as a tractor in Škoda factory. Only one piece was built by Škoda as a late-competitor to ČKD tankette which became the standard Tč vz.33. Both vehicles were modification of Carden-Lloyed Mk.VI. The Škoda one was better but it was late for the competition. In 1933 it won a tender of Yugoslav army but the it never materialized in an order. Yugoslavia ordered Škoda tankettes of later types though (including gun-armed which could be considered a sort of light assault guns). Unfortunately when I was in lešany last time, this tankette was not on display. The vehicle was 2,2 tons heavy, had up to 10 mm thick armor, two men crew and two LMG vz.26 armament. Thanks to the 40 Hp engine the top speed was rather good 40 km/h. The most interesting thing is that the vehicle was fully welded which is very unusual for pre-war Czechoslovak AFVs which were usually rivetted.  


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Since we got to the topic of the fortiffication cast elements in another topic I'm giving here what thickness of what in which resistance class was used and what those were supposed to withstand (by mid 1930' technology). I'm listing only what could be hit from enemy side. 


As mentioned elsewhere the known requirement for the steel was 550-700 MPa tensile stregth and ductility 14-17%. Per recent analysis of one cupola the hardness was 177 HV 30, i.e. 169 HB. The required compressive strength of the concrete was 450 kg/cm2, i.e. 44 MPa. Early object had less, some only around 30 MPa, later had often more, usually around 50 MPa. 


Light objects vz.36 were meant for frontal MG fire, vz.37 mostly for side fire but rarely also for frontal fire MG. Only one light object vz.37 for AT gun was built before Münich in Bratislava. Heavy objects mostly only for side direct fire and for indirect fire excluding cupolas and turrets which were to be used for frontal fire too (never installed). 


Light objects vz.36: To withstand 75 mm artillery 

- frontal walls: 50-60 cm of reinforced concrete 

- roof: 40-50 cm of reinforced concrete

- firing ports: 3 cm armoured steel shutter (I think that when this was designed Germany didn't have yet 75 mm AP shells) 


Light objects vz.37: To withstand 105 mm artillery or up to 155 mm in reinforced variant (quite numerous)

- frontal walls: 80 (120 reinforced variant) cm of reinforced concrete + 1 meter of stone wall + earth berm


Heavy objects (classes 1-III for isolated objects, IV for fortresses with more objects connected via underground network):


Class 1: To withstand frontal fire of 155 mm artillery

- frontal walls - 120 cm of reinforced concrete + 3 meters of stone wall + earth berm

- roof - 100 cm of reinforced concrete


Class 2: To withstand frontal fire of 180 mm artillery

- frontal walls - 175 cm of reinforced concrete + 3 meters of stone wall + earth berm

- roof - 150 cm of reinforced concrete

- armoured cupolas (usually observation with LMG) - 15 cm of steel 


Class I: To withstand frontal fire of 210 mm artillery

- frontal walls - 175 cm of reinforced concrete + 3 meters of stone wall + earth berm

- roof - 150 cm of reinforced concrete

- armoured cupolas (usually observation with LMG) - 15 cm of steel 


Class II: To withstand frontal fire of 280 mm artillery (most numerous variant), however the test object allegedly survived a direct hit of 305 mm on the roof

- frontal walls - 225 cm of reinforced concrete + 4 meters of stone wall + earth berm

- roof - 200 cm of reinforced concrete

- armoured cupolas (usually observation with LMG) - 20 cm of steel 


Class III: To withstand frontal fire of 305 mm artillery 

- frontal walls - 275 cm of reinforced concrete + 4 meters of stone wall + earth berm

- roof - 250 cm of reinforced concrete

- armoured cupolas (observation with LMG, single or twin HMG) - 30 cm of steel 


Class IV: To withstand frontal fire of 420 mm artillery 

- frontal walls - 350 cm of reinforced concrete + 4 meters of stone wall + earth berm

- roof - 350 cm of reinforced concrete

- armoured cupolas (observation with LMG, single or twin HMG) - 30 cm of steel (deeper and placed upon steel base)

- artillery retractable turret - 30-35 cm of steel for the movable part and up to 45 cm for solid armour around (never installed)


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Video compilation from the Military Historical Intitute related to the 1938. You can see a lot of shots mainly from 1938 including May partial and September full mobilization. You can see a lot of weapons such as tanks LT vz.35, tankettes Tč vz.33, Avia B-534, Avia/Fokker F-IX, Aero/Bloch MB-200 planes, light howitzers vz.30 and heavy ones vz.37, light field guns vz.17 and vz.30, AT guns vz.37, mountain guns vz.15, AA guns vz.22, heavy mortar vz.16,  mortar vz.17, HMG vz.24, LMG vz.26, some fortifications and of course rifles vz.24 (Mauser). The troops use mainly helmets vz.30 but some still have the old vz.20 (similar to WW1 German and 1917 Austro-Hungarian ones). From what is being said in the video the most interesting things are probably this - by 1938 Czechoslovakia had the 5th highest defence spending (in relation to GDP) in the world behind USSR, Germany, Japan and Italy. The peace army size was roughly 200 thousand men (60% infantry including armoured units, 20% artillery, 6% airfoce including AA units, 6% cavalry and 6% engineering). After the partial mobilization in May 1938 it had 370 thousand men, by the late September 1938 the number crossed one million due to the succesfully finished full-size mobilization (35 divisions including 4 of gendarmerie if I am not mistaken). The airfoce had 55 squadrons of which 38% were recon units, 38% fighter units and 24% bomber units.


Not said in the video but added by myself for the overal picture. The armoured units had 298 tanks LT vz.35, 50 tanks LT vz.34, 70 tankettes Tč. vz.33, 50 armoured cars vz.30 and several dozens of other armoured vehicles such as 15 armoured cars vz.27, 8 training Renault FT tanks, 6 armoured cars vz.23 etc. (not counting temporarily seized export vehicles), trains, armoured trolleys and river boats. Most of the armor was concentrated in 3 fully-motorized so called fast divisions which were mainly concentrated in Brno-Opava area where a flanking attack was expected. The fortifications shall have given the field army a time to move and regroup for counter attack where necessary. 


Another video taken from 1937 movie showing Czechoslovak army during military excercise. Quite interesting footage because it captures a lot of rare equipment. Mainly LT vz.34 tank which was the first serially produced Czechoslovak tank and even ancient Renault FT armed with HMG vz.24. Other than that there is field and heavy artillery, some airforce (Avia/Fokker F-IX bombers and Avia B-534 fighters) and a very funny concealed HMG nest at 2:06 :D What is also interesting is that quite a lot of the soldiers don't wear helmets vz.30 but older vz.20 or vz.28. Considering that those were stopped being used in 1936 it gives an idea that the video was taken probably in 1935-1936. 



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Beer
      I haven't found an appropriate thread where to put some interesting rare stuff related to WW2 development, be it industrial one or makeshift field modifications. 
      Let's start with two things. The first one is a relatively recently found rarity from Swedish archives - a drawing of ČKD/BMM V8H-Sv tank. The drawing and a letter was found by WoT enthusiasts in Swedish archives in 2014 (the original announcement and the drawing source is here). The drawing is from a message dated 8th September 1941. One of the reasons why this drawing was not known before may be that the Czech archives were partially destroyed by floods in 2002. Anyway it is an export modification of the V-8-H tank accepted into Czechoslovak service as ST vz.39 but never produced due to the cancelation of all orders after Münich 1938 (for the same reason negotiations about licence production in Britain failed). Also later attempt to sell the tank to Romania failed due to BMM being fully busy with Wehrmacht priority orders. The negotiations with Sweden about licence production of V8H-Sv lasted till 1942, at least in May 1942 Swedish commission was present in Prague for negotiations. The tank differed compared to the base ST vz.39 in thicker armor with different front hull shape (armor 60 mm @ 30° on the hull front and also 60 mm on the turret; all sides were 40 mm thick). The tank was heavier (20 tons) and had the LT vz.38 style suspension with probably even larger wheels. The engine was still the same Praga NR V8 (240-250 Hp per source). The armament was unchanged with 47 mm Škoda A11 gun and two vz.37 HMG. The commander's cupola was of the simple small rotating type similar to those used on AH-IV-Sv tankettes. It is known that the Swedes officially asked to arm the tank with 75 mm gun, replace the engine with Volvo V12 and adding third HMG to the back of the turret. In the end the Swedes decided to prefer their own Strv/m42. 

      Source of the drawing
      The second is makeshift field modification found on Balkans. It appears Ustasha forces (and possibly some SS anti-partizan units) used several Italian M15/42 medium tanks with turrets from Pz.38(t). There are several photos of such hybrids but little more is known. On one photo it is possible to see Ustasha registration number U.O. 139.

      Few more photos of such hybrid.
      It appears that the source of all those photos to be found on the internet is this book, Armoured units of the Axis forces in southeastern Europe in WW2 by Dinko Predoevic. 
    • By Beer
      11-12th May 1945 near Příbram, Czechoslovakia. 
      I guess it's little known event but in fact it was a real battle in terms of scale. While the German capitulation was signed already on 8th May the war continued in Czechoslovakia for coupple more days. Fighting in Prague ceased finally on 9th May but the German units didn't want to surrender to the Red Army and intended to fight their way to the Americans. Quite a strong group of them found themseves south-east of Příbram. Roughly 6-7 thousand soldiers from various SS and Wehrmacht units, mainly remains of SS Kampfgruppe Wallenstein, commanded by the SS chief commander in Protektorat Böhmen und Mähren Carl von Pückler-Burghauss tried to negotiate with the US Army but without success. Meanwhile his men started to fortify themselves hoping to find an agreement with the Americans. The German units were frustrated and murdered several civilians around the area. Due to that several partisan and so called Revolution guard units engaged in the figting with them but those were too weak (not more than few hundred men). In one occassion SS used waving a white flag to lure the partisan out of a cover and kill them. On May 11 Red Army engaged in the fighting and so did some elements of the US army serving as the imaginary wall behind the back. On 12th May early morning von Pückler-Burghauss finally handed his capitulation to the hands of Soviet general Seryogin from 104th Guard Rifle Division and American colonel Allison from 4th Tank Division. Some six thousands of German troops were takken prisoners by the Soviets while hundreds of soldiers and around two dozens of partisans died on the battlefield (the last one - armed local was killed two hours after the capitulation was signed). SS-Gruppenführer Pückler-Burghauss shot himself in the head shortly after he signed the capitulation. 
      There is a monument built on the place as You can see here.
      Usually they hold a small memorial event on the battlefield but this year it was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemy. Nevertheless here is some footage from 2018.
    • By Beer
      I am sure there are many very interesting stories to share about this topic. Let's start with couple of articles about the weird and sometimes downright crazy history of Czechoslovak assistance which helped Israel to survive its early days. It's true that Czechoslovakia asked a lot of money for bypassing the UN embargo but it doesn't change the fact that it helped in the critical time - before the change of course was ordered from Kremlin in 1949. It's also worth mentioning that the arms-smuggling to Israel brought up to 1/3 of all foreign currency income of Czechoslovakia at that time! It's all in Czech but well understandable with the google translate. 
      Here in short the story of the secret Czechoslovak operation DI - the military asistance to Israel from the website of the Czech Institute of the military history. The article contains rare historical photos from the covert military training for army specialists (pilots, tankers, mechanics and even an infantry brigade made of volunteers from the former Czechoslovak Army Corps in USSR). 
      If you really like the topic, you can learn many more details from these six chapters of this superlong article (sure worth studying for anyone interested in the topic).
      After that we have the totally crazy story of the Cairo bombing raid actually performed from the communist Czechoslovakia in 1948. Why don't we have yet any movie about three B-17s smuggled from USA, crewed by American-Jewish airmen, armed with former German machineguns and bombs and operating from an airfield located in then communist Czechoslovakia? If that doesn't deserve to be filmed than what does? 
      Most of you likely know that the first combat aircraft of the Israeli airforce were Czechoslovak Avia S-199 fighters. This stillborn stop-gap modification of the leftover Bf-109G airframe was rather useless in fact (Czechoslovakia had loads of Bf-109 airframes but no spare DB-605 engines whose reliability was absurdly low due to bad late-war steel, so the engines were replaced with Jumo-211 bomber units - completely unsuitable but available) but nevertheless it helped to stop the Egyptian attack on Tel Aviv and brought a very important psychological advantage on the Israeli side. More about these planes here. 
      To add to the absurdity of that time... the man behind the support for the Israel was Czechoslovak FM Vladimír Clementis who was executed just few years later as a result of an intra-communist power struggle.  
  • Create New...