T___A

Lame, this guy was awesome:

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/10/03/green-beret-legend-holocaust-survivor-vietnam-veteran-and-retired-two-star-dies/

Oh shit:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36705/dem-sen-joe-manchin-strongly-signals-yes-vote-paul-bois?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro

Holy shit:

It is probably related to this:

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/409817-russia-collusion-bombshell-dnc-lawyers-met-with-fbi-on-dossier-before

The table is set for a Saturday vote:

uh oh:

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/03/654015874/poll-amid-kavanaugh-confirmation-battle-democratic-enthusiasm-edge-evaporates

Looks like the hearing was an ambush:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/busted-gop-and-prosecutor-rachel-mitchell-knew-christine-ford-coached-friend-on-polygraph-before-hearing-then-caught-her-lying-during-testimony/

If this is true this enables the Thursday schedule for a vote suggest by some outlets:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36612/report-fbi-probe-finishing-tomorrow-paul-bois

Looks like the democratic strategy was predicated upon Kavanaugh and the Republicans folding; luckily People's Commissar Lindsey Graham has issued Order 227 and has sent his blocking detachments to the rear.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/409372-red-state-dems-face-nightmare-scenario-on-kavanaugh

I hope Trump orders a NICS check and then five minutes later be like:

"Yep he's good to go!" 

I mean after all it is an FBI investigation. 

M12 during the battle of Aachen:

The Dems could've had their FBI investigation all said and done by now if they didn't wait until the last possible second. Of course the counter point about Dr. Ford's privacy is nonsensical for the following reason:

The argument hinges on the implicit premise that we can have rapists on the Supreme Court as long as their accusers want to remain private. So if the letter is never leaked is Fienestein supposed sit there and allow who she genuinely believes is possibly rapist on the Supreme Court? A confidential investigation with confidential hearing would've been the most reasonable action for Fienestein to take. This would not have produced the results she wanted so that option had no chance. A public investigation with Dr. Ford remaining anonymous--an option I've seen seriously suggested--would be the most nonsensical option: we are not a totalitarian regime that allows for anonymous denunciations. When you accuse someone of a crime, especially a felony, you have no right to privacy. 

So the Dems don't come out looking good on this. 

Holy shit how you can so detached from reality:

Summon the blocking detachments!

1 minute ago, Lostwingman said:

 

So which woman do I believe so I won't be a sexist though?

Always listen to whe woman who serves the interests of the Democratic Party. 

Oh my God doooo it. 

https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/2018/09/22/draft-order-for-trump-would-crack-down-on-google-facebook#gs.BHhDros

He is not in my district but I have not heard anything I would consider egregious from him in the local news.

doooo eeet

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/407873-trumps-enemies-give-him-perfect-cover-to-fire-rosenstein-and-sessions

Are we going need to send in the AK to liquidate these uppity UPA shills? 

9 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

 

LOL

 

>House Intelligence Committee ranking member Adam Schiff, D-Calif., called Trump's decision "a clear abuse of power."

hmmm, not so quick to declassify stuff when you think it won't help you any

Except on that whole Russia collusion thing because it conflicts with the narrative.

destroyed German tanks at Kursk:

@EnsignExpendable @LoooSeR

Down the gunner's sight of a Ferdinand at Kursk:

2 minutes ago, Sturgeon said:

 

Never heard of it (unless you mean the shitty bumper sticker), care to elaborate?

It's a really, really, really, bad christian apologetic movie that like the Handmaid's tale doesn't actually interact with the other side and instead engages with caricatures.