Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

The Small Arms Thread, Part 8: 2018; ICSR to be replaced by US Army with interim 15mm Revolver Cannon.


Khand-e

Recommended Posts

spectre_m4.jpg

 

Spectre SMG.  I had a fanboy reaction to this one. First exposure to it was in the old pulp military fiction novels from the late 80s early 90s. Able Team/Mack Bolan and a couple of others. But they often had data files on weapons used in the books in the back.  Saw a picture of this there, and got interested in it.  Known for coming with a 50 round casket mag.  I think it's kinda neat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That certainly looks like a weapon that would be carried by an anonymous henchman standing around in the background of a super villain's top secret lair. It's the sort of gun that says "I'm wearing a bright blue contractors helmet and silver coveralls but I'm not supposed to look directly at the camera while I shuffle around in front of this forklift". It's the sort of gun that is so imposing, a guy with a toupee and tuxedo armed only with a .32 caliber pistol can shoot me from the distance of most cricket pitches while I spray the Spectre sub-machine gun futilely from the hip causing sparks to fly from the sheet metal siding the hero is hiding behind. It's the sort of weapon that the aforementioned hero wouldn't even deign to pick up as he escorts the buxom love interest through the hanger vault of the top secret lair while he attempts to track down the aforementioned super villain, before an elaborate countdown sequence blows up a recognizable World Heritage Site with a stolen nuclear device.

 

Cool find though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That video is a classic for all the mistakes - which is most of the clip. Not that the Sturmgewehr isn't an OK weapon, it was retained postwar by various Warsaw Pact countries. But I'm wondering if ol' Hitler might have been right after all by initially spiking the design given the concerns with ammo.

And did we ever find any after action reports where the MP-44 was a deciding factor in anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry's a gun guy, which is uncommon among his kind. So far as I know, he doesn't say anything that's blatantly wrong in the video, but he's definitely playing the gun up. That's not the producers or anything, either; Larry is a huge MP-44 fanboy (two of them crossed are used in his company's logo).

So while Larry and I would definitely find us having a cordial disagreement on the MP-44 if we ever met, that's neither uncommon among gun people, nor is it something that impugns his character in my eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Menacing, sleek, futuristic design!  :blink:  :lol:   And I don't recall that they made enough of them to be the standard weapon. Edit: 400kish made, along with 400k G/K 43s... Ok... I was off on that.

 

The production numbers for the MP-44 are not the problem I have with giving it the title of "first successful assault rifle", it's the ammunition and magazine production. It was pretty rare that enough ammunition and magazines reached the soldiers on the front lines to fully realize the concept in action. Collimatrix has the book on this, and I welcome his contribution in clarifying this statement of mine.

 

Having said that, the MP-44 clearly did crack the code of mass production of the rifles themselves (though by today's standards its stamping operations are maddeningly complex, it was still cheap for the period). Strictly speaking, it may not have been the first assault rifle design built around expeditious mass production, but it was the first to actually achieve the numbers. I haven't written anything on this exact subject yet, but I do consider advanced mass production techniques to be a key ingredient in the assault rifle concept. The ideal assault rifle not only marries the range and striking power of the bolt-action rifle with the automatic fire mode and handiness of the submachine gun, it also strikes a new balance between being sophisticated enough to be capable yet lightweight weapon like the bolt action rifle and being cheap and quick to produce with a minimum of man-hours like a submachine gun. In this, the MP-44 is definitely a success.

So between these two considerations, can we call the MP-44 successful? Well, I think yes and no. It was never going to be the war-winning tool some feel it could have been; there simply wasn't the support for it. However, as a byproduct of the Nazi regime, it absolutely paved the way for Eastern and Anglo-Belgian developments in the area, though the Americans would reject the rifle as being nothing more than a glorified submachine gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...