6.7x51 round and the LMG OS-124, this new rounds can be see as the russian's response to the .264USA

the program is called "“Alatau”" and the 6.7x51 rounds is aim to become the new marksman rifle and LMG rounds according to maxim.p

【Akula break news report】

The attack on junior high school in China

https://mbd.baidu.com/newspage/data/landingshare?pageType=1&isBdboxFrom=1&context={"nid"%3A"news_9080773373206920657"}

陕西多名初中生放学路上遭遇歹徒袭击 目前已致7人死亡19人受伤

Multiple junior high school student get attack after school in Shaanxi,China， cause 7 died and 19 injuries

华商报04-27 22:22

any infor for AO-38M and AG-021?

north korea behemoth

On 2018/3/30 at 7:19 PM, Bronezhilet said:

@Akula_941 @Khand-e @Monochromelody @Jagdika

 

and @all of the other chinese members we have

wait，is Curtis count as Chinese member?

also here is some picture support of I-231 that i just scanned

She was prevented from entering production by the unavailability of it's intended AM-39 engine

That's why people can't have nice things mikulin, you had one job.....

talk about interesting mig-3, sorry about the garbage image quality by my single hand scan...

there is some flaw，I-220 is first powered by AM-37 early 1942 ,and later switch to AM-39 not because it was planned but because the development of AM-37 was ceased,and then AM-39 were not ready so the first prototype installed AM-38F

34 minutes ago, Akula_941 said:

object432 has the similar support structure.

I made a huge mistake, the mark on object 432 are not support structure at all, it simly just a fill inlet.

I‘ve asked Alexei Klopotov and such 'reinforcement bar' were unheared by him. 

If that marking on the top of the turret is 'filler plugs' , i think it is believable.

well...no actual document or assembly drawings....

maybe we have to call @Andrei_bt to help

the guy who wrote Tankograd?hmm

anyway...

object432 has the similar support structure.but i'm not so familiar about the actual sequence of casting and product in detail.

this is fucking LIT!

1 hour ago, firoze said:

Interesting. Are you talking about this?

Nyet we are criticising this one

http://sensha-manual.blogspot.com.au/2017/09/the-ho-ri-tank-destroyer.html

Welcome Dango came to the forum!

10 YEARS

ZhengZhou Police force around 90s

Around the late 80s and early 90s most of the Chinese police force doesn't equip the Type 85(SVD).  

The only choice for medium range fire are picking the Type56semi（SKS）and mount with optic.

Oh looks like someone get their ass exposed HARD

On 2018/3/12 at 9:43 PM, LoooSeR said:

TELL US MORE

in short, people crys, shouting , cursing, claiming this whole file is fake, Abrams 900mm vs KE,DU stronk, USA win.

On 2018/3/8 at 11:30 PM, SH_MM said:

 

Wow,. thank you @skylancer-3441. Seems like R. Lindström (accidentally?) uploaded some (formerly?) claissified documents in his original presentation. That confirms that the diagram is real, @Militarysta

 

M1A2 turret was also meant to receive add-on armor...

 

Leclerc armor was very poor:

 

Leopard 2 armor evolution:

 

Turret front of a Leopard 2A5 is about 700-800 mm vs KE, 1,600 to 1,800 mm vs HEAT. The Swedish Strv 122 has a different armor package, providing higher protection levels; the Leopard 2 (flat turret) has 300 - 500 mm vs KE protection, but about 50% of the surface is protected against APFSDS ammo with less than 400 mm penetration into steel only.

Note the last slide: The German prototype offered to Sweden (and maybe also the German tanks) have Pakete (integrated armor pacakges) of the technology generation "B", while the Vors. Modul (Vorsatzmodul, add-on module in front of the armor) has the technology generation "D-2". I suppose Sweden uses a more modern integrated armor pacakge (C, D-1, D-2, D-3) and the same Vorsatzmodul. The German wikipedia (without citing a reference) claims that the German Leopard 2 uses "C technology" armor (so "Pakete"). Maybe that's based on Spielberger's book, I need to take a look at it in the future. The graph in the center of the last slide shows five colors... my guess (based on the graphs at the left and the right:

1. purple - Leopard 2 from 1979, armor package of the "b" generation (fits the graph on the left);
2. red - Leopard 2 with enhance armor package (1987), which might be "C" generation;
3. yellow - Leopard 2 with enhanced armor package (1992), which might be "D-1" generation;
4. blue - Leopard 2 with armor of the "D-2" generation or armor of the "B" generation with Vorsatzmodul of the "D-2" generation
5. green - Leopard 2 with armor as adopted by Sweden - so probably "C" or "D-1/2/3" base armor with Vorsatzmodul of "D-2" generation

 

This would lead to the following protection estimates (please note that it says frontal arc - +30° to -30°, not direct from front):

1. Leopard 2 - 2A4 (from 1979): 300 mm protection vs KE at 60% of the surface, 400 mm protection vs KE at 25% of the surface
2. Leopard 2A4 (from 1987): 300 mm protection vs KE at 65% of the surface, 400 mm protection vs KE at 55% of the surface, 500 mm protection vs KE at 30% of the surface
3. Leopard 2A4 (from 1992): 350 mm protection vs KE at 93% of the surface, 400 mm protection vs KE at 87% of the surface, 525 mm vs KE at 50% of the surface and 620 mm vs KE at 42% of the surface
4. Leopard 2A5 (prototype?): 620 mm protection vs KE at 65% of the surface, 700 mm protection vs KE at 40% of the surface
5. Leopard 2A5 (production model? Swedish model?): 700 mm protection vs KE at 75% of the surface

 

That also confirms that the older Leopard 2 models didn't feature the enhanced side armor found on newer production variants:

 

Btw: "gor" seems to be pentrated, "ub" means to be not penetrated in one of the earlier tables.

 

 

OH YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW THE BLOODY SHITSTORM LOOKS LIKE IN ANOTHER SIDE OF THE OCEAN

Singapore's visor device to work with BCI (brain-computer interface) drone

QBZ-87A with drum mag

#fuckqbz95

yes it is a railgun, i was gonna hold the news for a while,you guys are sure keep eyes on it huh? ))))

the railgun sea trial is based on 072-III class landing ship CNS-936 'HaiYangShan'

just a prototype sea trial, the gun itself are build by Dr.MaWeiMing's team from University of naval engineering in Wuhan. 

T-80UA（some said UK） equipped an interesting air-burst tank shell

any info Looser？

On 2017/5/4 at 8:33 PM, LoooSeR said:

L-15B, new training jet by Hongdu Aircraft Industry Group

 

 

 

 

 

lol，even i knew they are propaganda purpose but people of Nanchang really enjoy those praise leader and extol shit.

No wonder，Hongdu is like the unliked son in family, the truth they can build L-15 series successful is basically a miracle

also some abandoned vector thruster plan for J-8 modernization

engine baffle plan

two-dimensional thrust vectoring plan and the test prototype

some back fuselage design of the 2D TVC replace the horizontal stablizer and elevator of the 90s

well，guess they don't need that anymore

early J-10 vector thrust model showing in the picture. very weird 360 degree design

btw,anyone here in paralay's forum? @LoooSeR"Стелс машины''

i try to post something there but it just won't do anything, like a ip restrict or something