Mike E

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/scandal-wikileaks-reveals-hillary-clinton-to-be--reasonable/2016/10/10/bbad509c-8f19-11e6-9c52-0b10449e33c4_story.html
 
A lot of media outlets seem to be trying their hardest to bury the Podesta leaks.  Contrary to the Washington Post's silly claim, I don't think I could call any of this something I'd be proud of.
 
 

 
 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774
HRC and crew knowing since at least 2014 that Qatar and Saudi Arabia fund and supply ISIS.  They talk about how they need to pressure those countries on the issue, but we see how well that's worked out.
   
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205
Hillary campaign getting fed a debate question in advance of CNN Town Hall Debate with Bernie
 
1 2
CNBC Host and GoP debate moderator John Harwood being awfully friendly to Hillary and friends

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1040
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/627
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3347
HuffPost/TheHill writer coordinating a lot with Podesta.  There were more, but too lazy to find them and the point is made anyways.
 
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/286
Warning Clinton crew of someone having sent questions to the  Attorney General about the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/225
Letting Podesta know that the news broke about Uranium One
 
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fobs-hillarys-state-dept-gave-special-attention-friends/story?id=42615379
Not wikileaks, but oh well
 
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6900
Podesta on his thoughts with the Clinton Foundation scandal stuff in 2015
 
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011
http://i.imgur.com/rdLlMfD.png
On Hillary deleting her emails
 
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6434
What the Podesta family planned for dinner September 14th last year
 
 
Bonus content:





Additional Bonus Content:

/pol/ got into his twitter account today, as well as his Apple and Vamoose (a bus service) accounts.
1  2  3  4

Leopard 1A4, Leopard 2 and M60A3 all entered service in the 1970s, providing clear advantages over Soviet FCS technology. The Soviet copy of the PERI R12 of the Leopard 1A4 was developed between 1985 and 1992, despite the original German sight being adopted in 1974/1975...
 

Article from the most reliable source ever: http://izvestia.ru/news/636502
The only reason I even bother posting it is because the information contained is basically a known: Armata will use an updated variant of the Kalina FCS as seen on the T-90MS. The article claims the T-72 and T-90 will receive but that's kind of unlikely for both unless the latter gets updated.
This plus other news basically means T-14 has a comparable FCS to any of the Western beasts (for the first time since the 70's on a Russian tank tbh). TC can designate targets that are then relayed to the Gunner's screen, said targets can be automatically tracked (and most likely that includes tracking prediction) with all important variables accounted for. I may be mistaken but it also seems like the TC can designate multiple targets in a specific order: so they can be automatically engaged once the last one has been destroyed/engaged. Gunner only has to press fire almost.
LoooSeR, you know anything more on the ammunition situation? One article made it sound like APFSDS was still in development when another claimed it was already being produced, or something like that. I know the guys at Otvaga discussed this but the translation barrier is very tall.

Seriously, Ukraine?
 

 

Hmmm...
 

Article from the most reliable source ever: http://izvestia.ru/news/636502
The only reason I even bother posting it is because the information contained is basically a known: Armata will use an updated variant of the Kalina FCS as seen on the T-90MS. The article claims the T-72 and T-90 will receive but that's kind of unlikely for both unless the latter gets updated.
This plus other news basically means T-14 has a comparable FCS to any of the Western beasts (for the first time since the 70's on a Russian tank tbh). TC can designate targets that are then relayed to the Gunner's screen, said targets can be automatically tracked (and most likely that includes tracking prediction) with all important variables accounted for. I may be mistaken but it also seems like the TC can designate multiple targets in a specific order: so they can be automatically engaged once the last one has been destroyed/engaged. Gunner only has to press fire almost.
LoooSeR, you know anything more on the ammunition situation? One article made it sound like APFSDS was still in development when another claimed it was already being produced, or something like that. I know the guys at Otvaga discussed this but the translation barrier is very tall.

Thanks but I see myself as a Serb living in Australia .

PT-16 PLND STRNG

 

Anyone know what those attachments at the very end of the vehicle are? At this stage the Bumerang platform looks very matured, probably nearing production.

I am not sure if you folks noticed:


 
We got two images of the new gun and it shell. It's a 130mm L51 tank gun.
From the looks of it, the new shell is roughly 1200mm high.
 
What concerned me is the size of the shell. It rules out the carousel autoloader in any future western tank with this gun and a unmanned turret, unless you want a tank that makes the T-14 look short. I also wonder if they have the extend the ammunition rack for the old vehicles to make it fit.
 
If this is already posted or something like that, feel free to notify me and delete the post.
 
 
Mvh
Xoon.

A tank expert evaluates the Armata platform vs the German Leopard 2 (Russian only, sorry)
 

K2 fording river April 19 2016
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 
 

HMWWV used by UAF as artillery control vehicle

 

Sturgeon is really trying to get those 50$. 

So, ummmmm....ughhhh.....what? This is like the worst example of ERA-on-a-light-vehicle I have ever seen.  Crew must have a death wish.

I think it's an Abrams vismod of a T-72 vismod of the tiger tank.
 

lol, every battle in movie version of WW3 would have been Chieftains vismods battling with each other.

Oh wow, I wasn't aware they still had and used ASU-85s

Afganit will use UV sensors (in combination with radar) to detect/track and engage targets.
http://m.ria.ru/defense_safety/20160315/1389851741.html
Not new information, dates back to Army-2015 or so IIRC, but still very interesting. I wonder if it actually will use radar systems or not.

only 200 times, 190 of those without pants 

This is a sexy thread

Sturgeon's House management does not endorse the views and statements contained in its user-generated content.  All views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official doctrine on which populations are sub-human and must be exterminated.

Tiles M. from Tankograd has uploaded our next article (surprise, surprise, it's the T-80!): http://thesovietarmourblog.blogspot.com/2016/02/t-80-gambol.html?m=1