Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.


Recommended Posts

BM "Oplot"




Ukrainian designers managed to make biggest panoramic sight i ever saw - overall weight of it is reaching 500 kg.



       Oplot-M, or BM "Oplot" after addoption to service in Ukrainian army, is Ukrainian MBT based on another Ukrainian MBT - T-84 "Oplot", which is Soviet-designed T-80UD with some modifications. BM Oplot was designed by Morozov Kharkiv Machine Building Design Bureau and produced by Malyshev factory. Chief designer of BM Oplot - Mikhail Dem'yanovich Borisuk (he was born in 1934, BTW).



Side armor plates are pretty big - those boxes are new anti-tandem HEAT warheads "Duplet" ERA.


       It have several features, separating it from T-80UD, T-90A and T-84. Engine is new 6 cylinder 6TD-2E 1200 HP diesel with lowered smokiness and exhaust toxicity (wich is a problem for Kharkov engines) in new engine-transmission compartment (which is 2 part - lower is for engine itself and upper part is for big airfilters, which are needed because of how much air 6TD "eats"), new sort-of automatical transmission. Tank is equipped with new navigation systems, FCS, panoramic sight for commander with day and night (thermal imager) capabilities, new remotely controlled KT-12.7 12.7 mm HMG for commander, new gunner sights, which bring it to modern level of how tank should be equipped. A lot of that equipment is made not in Ukraine.



From the side BM Oplot looks different from Soviet T-64-like MBTs.


      Main gun is not really different from 2A46 125 mm guns of T-72/ T-80/T-90 series of tanks, 125 mm KBA-3 L48 gun with autoloader for 28 shots (46 in total is carried). Main gun can fire HE, HEAT, APFSDS, GL-ATGMs (Ukrainian "Kombat" missiles). AFAIK part of ammunition is carried outside of the tank, in turret "basket", mounted to the rear part of it. Nothing really fancy here, 5 km range with ATGMs, up to 2.5-2.8 km effective range with APFSDS, which is standart for late Soviet and current Russian MBTs like T-72B3, T-80UE and different models of the T-90. 


     Vehicle is also equipped with Ukrainian version/local variant of Shtora system - "Varta", with additional laser-warning sensors on the turret sides. 


Laser sensors are located near smoke grenades launchers.



     BM-Oplot use somewhat unusual type of ERA (which is most interesting feature of that tank) - ~layered ERA named "Duplet". It is rumored that it can defeat tandem HEAT warheads like PG-7VR and PG-29V. Vehicle sides are also covered by Duplet ERA. 


dmQOUAZ.jpg"Pockets" for ERA in BM Oplot turret. 


cSSA0yH.jpgBetter view on Duplet ERA layout.



ERA blocks are separated from each other by containers with some kind of damper material.



Frontal turret ERA assembly.







      Note that the hull UFP is covered by differently shaped blocks of ERA (long and narrow). How much it is effective is unknown, but designers claim that it can defeat tandem HEAT warheads, EFP and APFSDS projectiles.  


Upper frontal hull armor layout:



Frontal hull armor module:


As you see, it have 2 layers of ERA and steel plate between them.

It is possible that Oplot-BM entire frontal armor layout is just ERA-steelplate-ERA-steelplate or ERA-steelplate-ERA-steelplate-glass fiber-steelplate.


Side ERA modules:



      Overall, BM Oplot is tank with better perfomance than T-80UD thanks to improvements in electronics and FCS, engine, transmission, driver controls, new ERA and better side armor, and in some areas this vehicle can be superioir to T-72B3 (latest Russian serial produced modification of the T-72 MBT, although it wasn't best proposed modification for it).

      But..., there is always "but" -  it is vehicle that Ukraine can not produce in any serious numbers, as their one and only contract with Thai army showed - out of 95 BM Oplot ordered in 2011 only 5-6 were delivered to this day. During trials in Thailand Kombat GL-ATGMs also showed not very good results - AFAIK out of 5 test firings, 2 missiles exploded before reaching targets. Another interesting fact about that tank is that no BM Oplot MBTs are presented on battlefields of Eastern Ukraine - T-64 and T-72s are primary tanks of the VSU. Seems to me Ukraine is either can't service them, or simply can't produce them in a first place.


Oplot-BM on trials in Pakistan. No accurate information on results, rumors say that Chinese VT-4 won that competition.



Oplot-BMs for Thai army on prooving ground.






Link to comment
Share on other sites

Photos of Oplot-M.


Albums with Oplot-M photos:









Some others:



First BM Oplot for Thai army



BM Oplot during testing at prooving ground.




BM Oplot during testing at prooving ground.



BM Oplot during testing at prooving ground.



BM Oplot during testing at prooving ground.



Thomson CBF Optronique control panel is mounted upside down for some reason.



Gunner working place. Blue tape, blue tape everywhere.



Commander position aka "Any movement by your right arm will result in some random button being pressed"



BM Oplot in Thailand after it was unloaded from a cargo ship. 



Device that many tanks should have  :)  




















Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-64BM Bulat 



I don't know why Ukrainian and Russian designers have such love for adding pieces of rubber on turret frontal armor.


     T-64BM Bulat is Ukrainian modernization of older T-64A, B and BV models. It was designed by Kharkov design bureau, tanks are modernized at Malyshev plant. Modernization price is around 1 000 000 $ for each tank. Main target for modernization is to bring T-64 to T-80U level (T-80U POWER! #Leningradpride).


SAeyZd5.jpgYou can compare size of ERA blocks on turret roof with visible crewmember.



Hull ERA looks same as what BM Oplot have. 


     Modernization consist of adding new FCS 1A45 "Irtysh", new gunner and commander sights, new ERA (Soviet "Kontakt-5" to Ukrainian "Nozh"), some other modification to stabilizers, optics and other parts. Gunner now have day sight "Promin' " with laser rangefinder (9990 meters max, +-10 meters accuracy of range measuring), Buran-E night sight (1,5 km effective range) (Buran-Cathrine thermal imager, similar to T-90A thermal imager, also could have been mounted, but it was too expensive in eyes of Ukrainian MoD). Commander sight "Agat" is not stabilized in horizontal plane, BTW, but it allows to commander to use main gun and coaxial MG in case of emergency.     



Turret ERA.


    Turret also got new ERA layout, new, faster turret traverse mechanism. Hull is also received additional passive and active protection from th front and side (partially). 




     Tank also received better engine - 850 HP 5TDFM. After all modification tank weight reached 45 tons. 




     Overall, that tank reached T-80U level of firepower and, maybe, protection, wich is 1980s level of MBT designs. As was pointed out by Mikhail Borisuk (BM Oplot main designer) - Ukraine should stop working on T-64 modernization and start to work one more advanced vehicles like Oplot and Future MBT. 76 Bulat MBTs were already in service in Ukrainian armed forces by March of 2014. In Ukrainian civil war at least 15 were lost to this moment. Main problem of T-64 - reliability, was not really fixed. As battles showed, Nozh ERA have serious problems with chain detonation of blocks, where one hit can leave almost 30% of turret frontal projection or frotnal hull without ERA protection. Now, when temperature is dropping lower than +5 degr. C another problems of T-64 engine are starting to become visible - 5TDFM (and earlier 5TD diesels especially) is not well suited for working in cold conditions.

    During warming-up procedure engine creates toxic exhaust, which is not very good for your lungs and also creates oily condensate on air filters for maximum lulz. Number of other problems i will try to cover next time in post about perfomance of Ukrainian MBTs in civil war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pictures of the T-64-B1M




      I picked some photos of the T-64-B1M, which is T-64 modification for Kongo (which Kongo will never receive) because of the better looks ( B) ). It is largely similar to Bulat.



T-64B1M at Malyshev factory.



Same place.



Note new side ERA plates.



During test drive.





Test firing of the main gun.




Link to comment
Share on other sites

     So let's start to analyse performance of Ukrainian tanks and Ukrainian armored forces in current conflict in Eastern Ukraine. I will do it in series of posts and edits, not everything at once. I am too lazy for this :) .



General information.


     That conflict started almost year ago, but at first there were no serious combat until July of last year. Conflict has passed through several phases of escalation - 1st in Spring of 2014 when from protests and riots number of Eastern Ukrainians whent into armed opposition, than summer combat in June-July (2nd) with artillery, MRLS and even tactical ballistic missiles Tochka-U used later, than August combat and Illovaysk (3rd), and after first casefire - in winter 2014-2015 Donetsk airport and Debaltsevo (4th, last one currently).

     Most used armored vehicles during late spring/early summer were BTRs (BTR-3E, BTR-4s, different Soviet-made BTRs), BMD-2, BMPs (1 and 2, but BMP-3 was not used by Ukrainian forces, while they have them in service), civilian cars modified by boths sides, modified trucks, etc.  



Ukrainian forces and their technical.



Rebels and their moded Ural track.



Rebels and their 'mobile AA system'



Ukrainian BMD-2


      Tanks were not used in significant numbers, and those vehicles that were presented in combat, served as infantry support vehicles, spread amongst different units. During 1st stage of conflict main strike force for Ukrainian army were helicopters like Mi-24 and Mi-8, and jets like SU-25s, while combat on a ground was series of firefights between mobile groups of pro-Ukrainians/UAF and rebels (which is similar to Libya) with a lot of flag waving. Frontline did not exist in usual sense of what we think about frontline, albeit around Slavyansk there were checkpoints.

      Because of noticeable number of lost vehicles (thanks to MANPADS) this tactic was changed in 2nd stage of conflict (Slavyansk and Kramatorks fighting) - role, which helicopters previously fulfilled, was given to tanks. That role was conducting strikes on rebel's checkpoints on important roads and positions on frontline, during UAF attempt to cut Slavyansk rebels from Donetsk and Luhansk rebels. 


      Tanks used by UAF in Eastern Ukraine:

  • T-64 modifications and versions: A, B, B1, B1V, BV, B1M, BM1M (for Kongo), BM "Bulat"; 
  • T-72 modifications and versions: B, BA or BM, possibly UMG, AV, UA1 (for Ethiopia);
  • T-80, possibly U or UD.  


Ukrainian T-80U or UD. AFAIK it was captured by rebels.



Ukrainian president Poroshenko PR event, where he gave to UAF military equipment. T-64BV (left) and T-64BM "Bulat" (right) on a photo.



Same event, T-72UA1.


     List of rebels vehicles is pretty much the same (T-80U / UD was captured, but i didn't saw it in action), with exception of single IS-3, T-55 and T-34-85 and T-72B3. Rebels also used tanks in pretty much same way. 


Rebels T-64BV shelling UAF positions.



Rebels T-64BV. August-September photo, AFAIK.



Ukrainian T-64BV at checkpoint. White straps are used by UAF for friendly forces identification.



Captured T-64BV, modified by rebels, Igor Bezler's unit. Inscription says "Hello from Bes" ("Bes" is Bezler's nickname - Demon in English)



That guy riding on top of the UFP is like "i don't give a fck". Donetsk People Republic T-64BV, according to inscritpions.



Ukrainian T-72 that was used by National Guard's volunteer battalion "Dnepr".


      After Strelkov's group escaped from Slavyansk, Ukrainian army started to prepare to fight with Donetsk rebels. Operation started somewhere in June, and culmination of this operation was August combat around Illovyask ("Ilovayskiy cauldron", when UAF forces were surrounded be rebels). Situation with tanks and role, which they were used to perform didn't changed much - they still were usually used as dedicated infantry support vehicles, helping to specific infantry units to fight specific rebel groups. Although UAF showed first signs of creating "tank fists" and attempt to use tanks more than oversized RPG-7/squad MG, it didn't helped to UAF to stop encirclement. Number of tanks used in combat increased compared to June fights for both sides. 


      During September-December combat around Donetsk airport tanks were playing significant role for both UAF and rebels/NAF. Donetsk airport is several huge buildings, and every building was to be assaulted and cleared from opposite side. Infantry had pretty good positions inside of old and new terminal, which were really vulnerable only for tanks cannons.


Ukrainian tank in combat near airport, November 2014. 



Ukrainian tanks cover convoy for UAF soldiers inside of airport new terminal.


That convoy shelled firefighting station, where rebels were located.




Ukrainian tanks made this position pretty much unusable.



Flight control tower after rebels tanks "work". Later that tower was shelled again and collapsed just before rebels assaulted remaining parts of airport in UAF control. Tower was used by Ukrainian soldiers as observation post.



Screenshot from popular Youtube video, rebels fighting with Ukrainian forces inside airport. Note T-72.



Here is same T-72 firing at UAF in airport.



T-64BV, unknown side, airport.



T-64BV used by "Somali" DPR/rebels unit, somewhere near airport.




After combat for airport.



Russian journalists from KP near Ukrainian T-64BV.



Note T-64BV turret at upper part of that photo.


      After rebels took airport, UAF tried to conduct counterattack using "armored fist" tactics, although they did not had enough infantry and air support to succeed. 




   APFSDS hit mark on UAF T-64BV (number 248) upper frontal glacis.



Same vehicle №248, inscription says "Wolfs". Crew of that tank survived, abandoned their tank, but separatists captured them.



1 or 2 tanks left under Putilovskiy bridge, which collapsed after ammorack detonation of one of Ukrainian army T-64BVs. 


     That conflict went from couple of guys with SKS and AKMs riding technicals to tank assaults and counterattacks in less than 1 year. First UAF tank vs rebels fights showed that ATGMs were capable of dealing with old T-64s, but it was still not enough to counter them in 'tactical plane' - tanks were still capable to push rebels from their positions, with very well known result being rebels retreat from Slavyansk and Kramatorsk (due to threat of encirclement by UAF). One of reasons was that rebels simply didn't had enough of ATGMs in their hands, another reason was that Ukrainian tanks started to prefer long range shelling, decreasing chances to be hit and mitigating short range ATGMs like "Metis".


     As later combat around Donetsk airport and Ukrainian forces tank attack showed, armored push can be stopped by combined infantry and armor counterattack inside of city with devastating results for other side, although there are examples like battle near Redkodub, which looks like a piece of the Kursk Bulge (large losses on both sides).




After battle near Redkodub. Hard to tell, which part of what belongs to whom.


     At the 4th 'stage' of that conflict both sides had enough tanks to actually perform armored assaults. Rebels/NAF used tanks extensively during encirclement of UAF in Debaltsevo, each assault on small village, position and checkpoint of UAF were supported by tanks in not so small numbers. Tanks were used to break up positions of Ukrainian army/Natinal Guards near/around villages, push them into village/city itself and open oportunity to rebels infantry to enter the village itself. Tanks were helping to infantry to cover distance between settlements through basically open fields by suppressing enemy defence and destroying MG/AGS/etc positions.


     During Ukrainian civil war/Russian invasion, call it how you like it, tanks were used in different roles and different situations, replacing CAS and Mi-24s (although Mi-24s perfomance can be blamed on pilots), assault guns, long range "snipers" with 125 mm cannons, anti-infantry and anti-armor roles, support and primary weapon of attack. Although one thing should be not forgotten - combat was done using Soviet made or Soviet-grade weapon systems, with certain level of obsolescence. Which rise a question - if there is anything that can be learned from it by tank designers and military analysts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-84-120 "Yatagan"




    "Yatagan" MBT (Object 478N, also known as T-84-120 and KERN2-120) - tank developed in 1999-2000 by Morozov design bureau. It was  modification of the T-84, adapted to NATO standards with a 120 mm smoothbore tank gun and new autoloader inside of new turret bustle. It was created to participate in the Turkish tender for new MBT.



Yatagan and Leopard 2A6 in Turkey.


siSmzLj.jpgDuring one of many test.



   Yatagan was equipped with communication system made by French company Thomson, Belgian MG (FN Herstal), and other components of European manufacturers.
   On different photos Yatagan can be seen with at least three different 120mm gun (different barrels are give-away) of various designs, which at various times have been tested on this tank (rumors are speaking about Swiss Ordnance Enterprise Corp. being one of producers of the gun barrels). As the winner of the 2-years long tender was Leopard 2, Yatagan was not produced and currently exists only as a prototype.


    It had pretty powerfull 1200 HP 6TD-2 diesel engine, wich gived to it good mobility (weight was 48 tons, so ~25 hp/t). But most interesting part of that vehicle was turret bustle mounted new autoloader.



As you see, it is a conveyor-type of autoloading device. Ammunition and autoloader are isolated from rest of the tank and crew.



Hull autoloader is still exist in some form. 4 shells are located outside of any loading device. Tank at this picture is T-72-120 wich became basis for Yatagan.



Turret bustle rear is visible on that photo. Note 3 hatches, i think 1 of them (upper) is for ammunition loading into turret bustle autoloader. Also, hatches at buslte roof could be blow-out panels. Also, laser-warning sensors are mounted on this module too.



   Autoloader was created because of one-piece nature of NATO 120 mm tank ammunition. 22 shots were stored inside of turret bustle, with 14-16 rounds in hull autoloading mechanism + small non-mechanized ammorack for 2-4 shots. RoF was up to 10. Ammunition was standart NATO rounds, with addition of Ukrianian-made 120 mm GL-ATGMs. Tank also was armed with coaxial 7.62 GPMG and remotelly controlled 12.7 HMG on a commander hatch.


   Vehicle had thermal imagers, stabs and all other sorts of electronics you can expect from 2000-made MBT. But as i said, it didn't won tender, and never was produced. It is possible that Yatagan gave to engineers a basis for creation of the BM Oplot.


nEfQ6IS.jpgThis tank is T-84-based prototype with some features from T-84 Oplot and future BM Oplot. 




     Here is albums of this vehicle.


Crew compartment photos: http://imgur.com/a/SNsl2


Up-close pictures: http://imgur.com/a/EFcdn


PR iamges: http://imgur.com/a/UwQ9m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang, I never thought I'd see a bigger gunner's primary sight than the one on Leclerc, and here comes Oplot-M.

Oplot-M commander now have sight big enough to block his HMG from shooting at targets to the left of it. 






I still like how it looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he's an "authority" on defense topics who constantly hijacks any threads regarding eastern or non aligned nations (particularly Russia and China though) and says how anything talked about in the thread is merely propaganda and people are merely being "X nation fanboys" and how everyone else BUT HIM is merely being biased and blind to the truth of..... his words, no matter how overwhelming the actual evidence to the contrary to him is. He'll then just ignore that and go into butthurt manchild mode until the thread dies or he gets banned because clearly his word isn't the final matter on any topic.


He's also funny in the sense where he claims how Eastern nations accomplish nothing or can just copy the west, when he's someone from Poland who hides behind US tech all the time as opposed to his clearly #1 military innovator nation of Poland for bizarre reasons.


Basically, he's a complete fucking idiot nearly on the level of Mike Sparks and it fucking baffles me he has even a remote shred of credibility left in the defense discussion community with anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By T___A
      This shall be the general thread for all things soviet tanks. I shall start by posting an article I just wrote for my blog. I would recommend Archive Awarness which is an excellent blog about Soviet tanks and their experiences with other nation's tanks.
    • By Monochromelody
      The Al Khalid derived from Norinco Type 90IIM MBT. It was in the early 90s, when India started to test their Arjun MBT. Pakistanis looked for a MBT design that could be produced by herself. 
      Norinco provided their own Type 90IIM prototype, this is an MBT design which comprised many Western components, such as engine and transmission. 

      There were 4 prototypes for Al-Khalid development, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. 
      P1 has a Chinese tank diesel engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission. 
      P2 has a British Perkins CV12 Condor diesel engine with French SESM ESM500 transmission. 
      P3 has a Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 2-cycle boxer engine with its own twin planetary gearbox. 
      P4 has a German MB871 engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission, similar to South Korean K1 MBT. 

      Norinco and Pakistanis planned to adopt one of the Western powerpack at first, but due to CoCom (Coordinating Committee for Export to Communist Countries) restrictions, China is under embargo, which means China would not import weapons form Western countries. Obviously P3 powerplant would be the only choice. All those descriptions on the internet about ESM500 in Al-Khalid is fatally wrong. 
      The Al-Khalid pre-production batch and production version all equipped with Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 powerpack.
      It is an extremely compact design, the engine laid transversely in engine room, twin planetary gearboxes connect to both left and right end. The 6TD-2 has two crankshafts: the front one drives the mechanical supercharger, while the rear one drives the gearboxes. The cooling system covering the whole engine room, the engine itself has no mechanical connection to the cooling system, and the cooling system doesn't need mechanical drive. The cooling system based on a unique principle: exhaust gas driven ejector. The exhaust gas from the engine is injected through the outlet ducting, produce a low pressure in the outlet side, that will suck in cold air from the inlet side. This principle is also used in the T-64, T-80UD and T-84, but as far as I know, Swedish Ikv 91 is the only western tank that have similar cooling principle. 
      As a result, the total length of powerpack is significantly shortened, much more shorter than the European powerpack mentioned above. This leads to a spare storage room between the fighting compartment and the engine compartment. This storage is for extra ammunition and fuel, when turret points 3 or 9 o'clock, the top cover of the storage could be opened from outside, containing 10 rounds for main gun, with projectiles on the outsides, semi-combustible charges on the inside.
      The data table from HIT also describe the ammunition capacity as 39+10, means that 22 ready rounds in the T-72 type carousel autoloader, 17 backup rounds scatter around the fighting compartment, and extra 10 rounds could be carried in the storage room. 
      The driver of Al-Khalid control the vehicle via steering wheel and an automatic gear control box. The steering wheel and gear control box send electrical signals to the computer, then computer control the hydraulic servo actuator to perform engage and disengage of brakes and clutches, making steering and gear changes, as well as adjusting the speed and torque of the engine.
      Mechanically the gearboxes are nearly the same as T-64s and T-72s, but have different side reducer unit. The KMDB side reducer unit is designed as a secondary gearbox, acting like a forward-reverse selector. When both reducers were put into reverse, the vehicle can reverse using the normal forward ranges. From 1st gear to 4th gear, all could be used as high speed reverse, and that's why KMDB said this is a 7F4R gearbox system. And if only one reducer was put into reverse, the track will be driving in opposites direction, causing the vehicle turns within its tracks, a.k.a. pivot steer or center steer. T-84 also applied this driving and steering system.  
      The advantages of Al-Khalid's powerpack is the versatility: all 3 types of MBT in the Pakistanis arsenal, T-80UD, T-84, Al-Khalid, share the same engine and gearbox. 
    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.

      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!

      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
    • By delfosisyu
      Hey guys. This is my first post in this forum.
      I want to find out sources for 2 information.
      Firstly, a friend of mine told me about the accuracy of T-80B tested in 1980s.
      T-80B      1000m   1500m     2000m
                      87%       66%       46%
      I asked him where he found this data. But he told me he forgot where he did find this since too much time passed from that moment.
      The Second one is about Russian ballistic computer's range-finding rate.
      One day, one of my friends who speaks russian quite well showed me a product info. of russian(maybe ukrainian) gunner's primary sight.
      It was written that range-finding rate of the sight after laser fired-off 0.3~3.0 seconds. 
      I totally forgot the address of that product brochure.
      I'd be very appreciated if you help me finding links of these information.
  • Create New...