GregHouse

He *did* organize his thoughts first, you retarded little bitch.

He *did* organize his thoughts first, you retarded little bitch.

I'm Armenian-Georgian mix, my parents are from a village in Southern Georgian region near Turkish border. There are several german members in this forum, who i respect. I don't care about nationality of people.
 
   You need ability to follow guidlines. I threw people submissions from competitions for less than that, like during one of previous competition when i excluded this forum owner's submission literally because of several mm. Your submission was not getting any favorable or unfavorable treatment.
 
 

He *did* organize his thoughts first, you retarded little bitch.

He *did* organize his thoughts first, you retarded little bitch.

He *did* organize his thoughts first, you retarded little bitch.

Judges of this competition want to inform @Lord_James and @delete013that your submissions where excluded from this competition.
Lord James submission wasn't finished in time and it is incomplete, lacking critical data. Sorry, James, would be interesting to see results if you could finalise your design. Delete submission doesn't meet requirements for submission itself.... Failure at basic reading skills. Although judges reviewed design itself and will comment on it later.

If imperial units were so indispensable, you could have said something before or throw my submission out the moment it was posted. Unless there were other plans..

1) It was said before, right in the first post.

2) Your submission was reviewed, and you wouldn't have won with this design anyway. It is insane and several elements are simply reality-bending piece of work. As i said previously, later judges will comment of this submission.
 

The fault of failing to read, or ignoring, the requirements for the submissions.
 
Which is LMAO, but would be fine and everyone has days of retardation, but no... you had to whine like the little bitch you are, had to blame on the evil Russians.

Congratulations, it's only Monday and you win the prize for "most retarded thing I read on the internet this week"

Huh, when you own a website and are an administrator on the forum that you establish you can do anything you want

who knew? fucking sorcery

Huh, when you own a website and are an administrator on the forum that you establish you can do anything you want

who knew? fucking sorcery

Huh, when you own a website and are an administrator on the forum that you establish you can do anything you want

who knew? fucking sorcery

Huh, when you own a website and are an administrator on the forum that you establish you can do anything you want

who knew? fucking sorcery

Huh, when you own a website and are an administrator on the forum that you establish you can do anything you want

who knew? fucking sorcery

Congratulations, it's only Monday and you win the prize for "most retarded thing I read on the internet this week"

Congratulations, it's only Monday and you win the prize for "most retarded thing I read on the internet this week"

Congratulations, it's only Monday and you win the prize for "most retarded thing I read on the internet this week"

Congratulations, it's only Monday and you win the prize for "most retarded thing I read on the internet this week"

You sound very sure of that.

Congratulations, it's only Monday and you win the prize for "most retarded thing I read on the internet this week"

Apologies for going back a ways. Also I'm new here, hiya. 

A minor corrective point:
> The F35 used in the test was AF-2, which was using Block 2B software

As a flight sciences aircraft, AF-02 doesn't have mission systems and is on a special block of very limited software known internally as 0.5 from which it will never substantially move up. The more relevant numbers would be whatever its Vehicle Systems software was, IIRC in those days it was something like version 30 point something (now they're on version 40+). So I guess you could say it had the 2B vehicle systems software, but saying it had 2B as a whole would be a little incorrect.

Spot on otherwise.

Apologies for going back a ways. Also I'm new here, hiya. 

A minor corrective point:
> The F35 used in the test was AF-2, which was using Block 2B software

As a flight sciences aircraft, AF-02 doesn't have mission systems and is on a special block of very limited software known internally as 0.5 from which it will never substantially move up. The more relevant numbers would be whatever its Vehicle Systems software was, IIRC in those days it was something like version 30 point something (now they're on version 40+). So I guess you could say it had the 2B vehicle systems software, but saying it had 2B as a whole would be a little incorrect.

Spot on otherwise.