-
Posts
1,521 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Everything posted by Xlucine
-
General Naval Warfare News/Technology thread.
Xlucine replied to Belesarius's topic in Naval Discussion
These are fun -
The Space Exploration Achievements Thread
Xlucine replied to Sturgeon's topic in Elon Musk: Making Space Great Again
-
Here's the TASS article quoted: http://tass.com/defense/1023982 It clearly states that some group in russia has designed a catamaran carrier (which may or may not be built), but it's nothing to do with that image - some guy made that up in 2009 (it's also one of the first results on google images for "catamaran aircraft carrier'): https://www.dedoimedo.com/art_3d/carrier.html The design discussed in the TASS article seems reasonable, stitching together two hulls will get you a lot of flight deck for your money
-
Not yet, I'd expect FGR (like the most recent typhoons)
-
PutinsuitTM
-
I'm not sure how anyone could get to salisbury and back without showing up on CCTV
-
Brits are quite chuffed:
-
General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.
Xlucine replied to LoooSeR's topic in Mechanized Warfare
They're marines, I'm sure they could find loads of volunteers to sit on top of the missiles to drive the thing around- 1,911 replies
-
Materially it's one big weld (thinking of SLM, which is laser welding aluminium powder into the desired shape - in an inert atmosphere ofc). Not great for fatigue (e.g. you're very likely to end up with porosity), which might not be ideal for a receiver (I don't want to say it can't be done, but it'd need testing before saying it can be done). If this was really getting made then it'd be a much better option for the first half dozen prototypes, before the geometry was finalised enough for the big spend on the die for the extrusion. Upper receivers are hollow bodies of almost constant cross section by definition (as they're enclosing the reciprocating moving parts), so it's a natural match for extrusion for full production
-
Stereolithography is great if UV-cured resins are good enough for what you're doing, which is rare (short of prototypes that you're testing for fit&feel). The final products tend to embrittle over time (especially if exposed to sunlight, as the UV continues crosslinking), which is not ideal for a firearm. It would be an elegant solution to getting a long handguard, as the final part can be much bigger than the original tank (if you're using the bottom-up build process, with UV projected on the bottom of the resin tank)
-
27k rounds of 14.5mm HMG at 0:43?
- 1,043 replies
-
- challenger 2
- warrior
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I also suspect hypersonic. If you need what is almost a trident tube to fit one on a sub (along with the booster) then it'll be pretty hefty
-
How's the handguard made? Extruded aluminium with the lug by the magazine welded on?
-
United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines
Xlucine replied to Tied's topic in Mechanized Warfare
Loaders need a lot of space, cutting them down to a similar footprint as the gunner would free up a lot of room. I'm not sure if this would tetris out as resulting in a reduced width turret, but it'd free up some volume -
Could be CGI upper hull on a tracked vehicle pretending to be a tank (proper CGI of snow being non-trivial)
-
I'm sure the RTR will love the all-black colour scheme, but cav may not be as impressed
- 1,043 replies
-
- challenger 2
- warrior
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Double log!
-
When you think about it, all guns are just long range poking implements
- 10,752 replies
-
- schv
- big bullit
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.
Xlucine replied to LoooSeR's topic in Mechanized Warfare
Looked like they were manually flying a top attack profile on that shot- 1,911 replies
-
That's a lot of effort for a 0.63 MW mobile generator
-
Erm, good point. I'm not sure if the value for chieftain hull height to turret roof is correct, but that depends on if the ground clearance includes the V or not: 1956 mm per this 1959 specification, which still puts the chieftain hull close to the cent hull height