Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Akula_941

Forum Nobility
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    100

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Akula_941

  5. General AFV Thread

    in Mechanized Warfare

    Posted

    South Korea KAAV-II

    oE4dubT.jpg

    Three types of chassis are proposed.
    Variant 1 has basic armor with turret at rear half, dimension is (LXWXH in meter) 9x3.6x3.1, turret dimension would be 2.2x1.6x0.6, Crew 3 and 20 infantrymen, engine will have 1500HP. It will bend bow flap and engine will be located on the forward and waterjet on the side of the vehicle.
    Variant 2 and 3 are similar to each other but with minor difference. Variant 2 use composite armor and use Vshape bow flap while Variant 3 use basic armor bend shaped bow flap. Dimension for 2 and 3 is 9.4x3.5x3 and turret dimension is 1.8x1.7x0.6, with crew of 3 and 20 infantrymen and engine hp will be 2700. Turret will be located on front half and engine will be located in the rear and waterjet in the interior.

     

    wxPWTQe.jpg

    Proposed turret from left to right, K21, CTA manned turret, and CTA unmanned turret

    O820U7T34PXSHE0EVM88.jpg

    hell that's a lot of seats

    also boasted MT-883 to 2700hp, yeesh

     

  14. How Not to Post in the Historical Warfare Section

    in Historical Warfare

    Posted

    Just now, Peasant said:

    Later models like Ki 84 and N1K, are superior to Zero are they not?

     

    Because Russian plane uses inline, so less drag. Japan does not try so much.

    Climb rate, energy retention, acceleration, roll rate, turn rate, are important.

    To a point but the acceleration is very important in that, no?

    No，Russian don't always uses inline and their radial one (Lavochkin) are as good as the yaks and maybe even better.

     

    Ki-84 and N1K both are better than Zero yes but what can they do？ N1K fight P51H in 1944 with 620km/h top speed？what is he going to wait P51H to turn and cut it with katana? lmao

    ZgjH0jW.jpg

     

     

    FaxoGih.jpg

     

     

    Ki-84 is the only one that worth getting some credit, since it actually can match F6F，TAIC doesn't care about Ki-84，and giving the estimate report 156A that is totally contradiction to other report like F-1M-1119C-ND (which also is estimate but marked as fucking FACUTAL, TWAT). 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ogypnCf.pngBUT that's it

    it can't even dive right, it's just a shit that is better than the existing shit (Zero)

    eulHxtT.png

    It never reach 687km/h since it's the misread of 156A and F-1M-1119C-ND

    Bushido won't help them, turning rate won't help em. Koyama himself knows better than you Jap plane fan ，he decide to rise wing load and weight exchange horizontal maneuverability to high speed performance.

    that's all, Ha-45 cannot give 1900 horse power. And Hayate is just a broken dream. There goes the end of the story.

  15. How Not to Post in the Historical Warfare Section

    in Historical Warfare

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Peasant said:

    Engine is too weak & even weaker at alt, even with "better" planes Japan cannot fix disproportionate kill ratio.

     

    Product of communications, pilot skill, and compounding issues.

     

    Is that not so?

     

     

    Or is there a genuine technical unsolvable disadvantage with the Zero?

    better plane my ass，go found a japanese fighter plane that can stably reach 650km/h. NOT EVEN ONE.

    Russian can do it with weak engine, why won't japanese? trash is trash

  16. How Not to Post in the Historical Warfare Section

    in Historical Warfare

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, Peasant said:

    I don't read Japanese unfortunately.

     

    Can you tell me the meaning?

    long sentence short,  “Zero is already have no advantage against F4F-4 in East Solomon，and later facing F6F with 2x stronger engine power Zero is being slaughtered one side. This end up by a total massacre in battle of philipean sea(マリアナ沖海戦)"

    second part is pretty much shitting on japanese zero lover " Zero is the most famous aircraft made by japan , the sign of japanese industry and patriotism. I (the author) can understand this emotion and feeling of yours(japan local zero lover), but as a weapon it get outclassed very quickly, battle of east solomon is where it falls, and later become basically free EXP."

  17. How Not to Post in the Historical Warfare Section

    in Historical Warfare

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Peasant said:

    It did in A6M8. Which is derived from the 1942 plan. Which began execution in 1945.

    The Zeroes armor would not have helped the Japanese in any meaningful way. Nor would have the self sealing tanks. It would have achieved the aircraft crashing into the sea/not being involved for much of the pacific war however.

     

    Monumentally stupid? Do you think they had anything to use otherwise? Send them to training? You can say it's stupid but look at how feasible your plan is.

    3

     

    It did in A6M8? what did in A6M8? i see nothing lol

    ENx5CNf.png

    boHeS6l.png

  18. How Not to Post in the Historical Warfare Section

    in Historical Warfare

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Peasant said:

    F6F has lower p/w performance because of the airframes weight. It's less maneuverable and while it does roll faster, the Zero losing dogfights comes down more to tactics and the engines altitude performance.

     

    Had the Zero an improved engine, which the A6M8 proves it can handle, the F6F would also be outclimbed.

    It is simply just cringe to read your post, here:

    ThyzcX0.pngcG8abst.png

×
×
  • Create New...