Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sign in to follow this  
Marsh

Magach based Spike launcher officially unveiled

Recommended Posts

The Magach based Spike launcher, the Pereh or Wild has been officially revealed. Thanks to "Camera" at the Mess for the heads up. The vehicle has been in service for 30 years!

Links currently available in Hebrew only. 

 

Cheers

Marsh

 

http://www.fresh.co.il/vBulletin/t-5...�לי_תמוז

 

http://www.israeldefense.co.il/he/co...�רא-נחשף

 

https://www.facebook.com/mazidf/phot...type=1&theater

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And many people here thought that it launches those missiles from turret, which would require to rotate turret so rear part of it would face target. THose pictures cleared those speculations. I will post some of them here from your link, Marsh.

 

62000885.jpg

 

97788741.jpg

 

70696511.jpg

 

53317064.png

 

14976591.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes LoooSer it uses the Tamuz. A non line of sight Spike. Fibre optic spool with either fire and forget or man in the loop options

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I didn't know any better, I'd say those are M48 hulls, not M60 hulls given the way the ERA curves like that on the glascis.

 

EDIT: Not that they tend to distinguish between the M48 and M60 in referrign to them as the Magach, just thought it was interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes LoooSer it uses the Tamuz. A non line of sight Spike. Fibre optic spool with either fire and forget or man in the loop options

 

Spike NLOS? Are Tamuz and Spike NLOS same missile or they are different missiles that do similar job? If my memory serves right, Spike is Rafael and Tamuz is Elbit-produced guided missiles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spike NLOS? Are Tamuz and Spike NLOS same missile or they are different missiles that do similar job? If my memory serves right, Spike is Rafael and Tamuz is Elbit-produced guided missiles.

Nope. Tamuz and Spike are the same missile produced by Rafael. Tamuz is the IDF designation, Spike the manufacturers for world wide sales. The first designation by the manufacturer was Gill, but that name was dropped years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Elbit produce any ground-based missiles? I remember that i was told that they are making such things.

 

To the best of my knowledge, Elbit now focuses on anti-missile counter measures. Rafael produces most of the ATGMs that the Israelis build. IAI did produce Nimrod, a very long range ATGM, but I don't know the status of that programme. This is not to say that Elbit doesn't produce missiles, but if so, the programmes are still classified.

 

cheers 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I didn't know any better, I'd say those are M48 hulls, not M60 hulls given the way the ERA curves like that on the glascis.

 

EDIT: Not that they tend to distinguish between the M48 and M60 in referrign to them as the Magach, just thought it was interesting.

yep, looks like an M48 hull to me too.  I guess that makes sense.  If these really do date back thirty years, it would make more sense to use M48 hulls since the M60 was still a front line tank at that point.  The Israelis sure to like to recycle their AFVs in creative ways.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, looks like an M48 hull to me too.  I guess that makes sense.  If these really do date back thirty years, it would make more sense to use M48 hulls since the M60 was still a front line tank at that point.  The Israelis sure to like to recycle their AFVs in creative ways.  

 

Yeah, my friend the former Merkava III commander mentioned they were M48 hulls. As you say, the M60 iterations of the Magach would still have been frontline tanks at that point so it does make a lot of sense. Although it gets confusing when talking about the Magach, because the IDF doesn't really distinguish between various marks of the Magach when talking about them, they're all pretty much just called Magach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The intent of the Pereh was to engage and destroy formations of enemy armour approaching the border with a specific emphasis on the Golan. The airforce in 1973 had not been able to interdict columns of enemy tanks, prior to their arrival on the battlefield. Dense enemy air defences  made such missions too costly. Ripple fire of Tamuz from Peleh batteries was intended to restore the ability to reach out and destroy, with precision, at a distance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we had "Hermes" missile system under development with similar idea - attacking enemies at long range without using Air forces. There were 25, 50, 100 km range missile variants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reposting this here.

 

 

 

EZwhtOy.jpg

 

gXtr6Of.jpg

 

03d3aaH.jpg

 

HhncSL6.jpg

 

 

 

kBQICDo.jpg

 

ZGHJsPz.jpg

 

hw0EZ6Z.jpg

 

zH3MvGa.jpg

 

 

Looks like T-14's crew compartment. Note that this is turret, and nothing remotely looking like gun breech is inside. 

rgzVS3a.jpg

 

ly6Xags.jpg

 

5MMQxh7.jpg

 

kCC7em4.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Mighty_Zuk
      Welcome to Mighty Zuk's place of mental rest and peace of mind. This is my realm. 
      I've decided it would be best to ditch the old Merkava thread for 2 reasons:
      1)It does not feature any bunched up information in its main post, and valuable information is scattered across different posts on different pages. 
      2)Many AFVs that are not related to the Merkava, or related but are not it, appear in that thread with improper representation. There are other AFVs than the Merkava, and it would be better to refer to them in a general way.
       
      As time will go by, I will arrange this thread into a sort of information center. 
       
      I will take up a few first comment spaces to make sure proper amount of information can be stacked up on the front page and for easier access for everyone.
       
      [Reserved for future posts - Merkava]
    • By Xlucine
      http://irmep.org/cfp/DoD/071987_CTAIIANN.pdf
      Here's a recently declassified report from 1987 into the israeli nuke program, do what you want with it
    • By LoooSeR
      This is general thread for all infantry-carried (or semi-infantry-carried) ATGMs. Here we will collect all the data on ATGMs and their combat use.
       
         Short information on ATGMs - ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missile) is a type of precision weapon that can be used by vehicles, helicopters and infantry. Main difference between them are type of guidance, warhead, range, weight (important for infantry).
       

      Konkurs-M ATGM and 9M113M missile for it.
       

      Vehicle-based Konkurs ATGM system.
       
         2 type of warheads are most common among ATGMs - HEAT and thermobaric. HEAT is anti-tank/anti-vehicle warhead, while thermobaric is anti-infantry/soft targets warhead.
       
         There's 3 types of guidance systems that are used in ATGM systems in use by infantry - MCLOS, SACLOS and fire and forget. SACLOS is most common type of guidance, while fire and forget is most advanced that gained a lot in recent decade. MCLOS is almost non-existant today. Some systems like several models of Spike family use combined type of guidance (fire and forget or via operator using missile's warhead optics and controls on launching module to guide missile by himself). SACLOS and fire and forget are pretty accurate and reliable methods of missile control, which is a reason for popularity of them between different designs.
       
         I don't think there is a need to explain RPGs.
         
       
          Will begin combat use section with this - from Syrian, Lattakia province - close ATGM support (looks like Konkurs).

       

       
         TOW-2A vs T-90 (early model)

       
         Kurds with Javelin ("Fck you, Ukraine, no Javs for you!" lol)

       

       

       

    • By LoooSeR
      We should have such thread as those weapons were used a lot in conflicts of last 2 years, and are used now.
       
         New Best Korean 300mm MLRS, it was shown at a parade in Oct of 2015. I saw claims that it can reach 160-180 km.
       






















×