Militarysta

Part two:

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

And the first GAk-81 salvo:
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Next part part of poor quality photos:

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

And the first GAk-81 salvo:
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

And the first GAk-81 salvo:
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

And the first GAk-81 salvo:
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Part three
 

 

 
 

Part two ;-)
Vehicles during trials before army had take them - so they are without camouflage yet.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sevral of my photos - Command RAK-SMK vehicle shooting GAk-81 camouflage granade:
 

 
 

 

 

 
 
GAk--81 empty case:

 
 

Sevral of my photos - Command RAK-SMK vehicle shooting GAk-81 camouflage granade:
 

 
 

 

 

 
 
GAk--81 empty case:

 
 

Part two ;-)
Vehicles during trials before army had take them - so they are without camouflage yet.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Part two ;-)
Vehicles during trials before army had take them - so they are without camouflage yet.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Part two ;-)
Vehicles during trials before army had take them - so they are without camouflage yet.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sevral of my photos - Command RAK-SMK vehicle shooting GAk-81 camouflage granade:
 

 
 

 

 

 
 
GAk--81 empty case:

 
 

Sevral of my photos - Command RAK-SMK vehicle shooting GAk-81 camouflage granade:
 

 
 

 

 

 
 
GAk--81 empty case:

 
 

No details, usally "super fast SC" is more then 10,5km/s
 
 
No, this ERAWA-2 from your post is lightweigt version based on aluminium alloy casette and HHS throwable plates. Normal ERAWA-2 is based on HHS casette.

Well from my article in FO! :https://fragout.uberflip.com/i/1150145-frag-out-magazine-25/79?
There is description. Generally - prototypes of Pzf-3T and IT600 has faild vs ERAWA in 2000  (losing 50% penetrating power) but finall PzF-3IT600 whit new main "super fast" SC perforated in 2007 ERAWA-2 without any problem (lost only ca 100-150mm RHA).

Well from my article in FO! :https://fragout.uberflip.com/i/1150145-frag-out-magazine-25/79?
There is description. Generally - prototypes of Pzf-3T and IT600 has faild vs ERAWA in 2000  (losing 50% penetrating power) but finall PzF-3IT600 whit new main "super fast" SC perforated in 2007 ERAWA-2 without any problem (lost only ca 100-150mm RHA).

http://www.witu.mil.pl/www/biuletyn/ptu_2020/151/97.pdf
 
The reduction of the armour system mass was estimated to 32-37%due to the use of the innovative grade of steel.
 

http://www.witu.mil.pl/www/biuletyn/ptu_2020/151/97.pdf
 
The reduction of the armour system mass was estimated to 32-37%due to the use of the innovative grade of steel.
 

Soviet's since ca 1982 where looking abilities to overcome NERA armour and NxRA - so 3BM26 3BM26 and finally 3BM42 and 32. But in end of the 80's main arour where switched from NERA/Nxra layout to ceramics - and IMHO it's dffrent problems for main armour.
Again - nothing to compare to "stupid mm RHA"
It was in sucht schape on former Soviet Unionf

(sorry - source I will let to myself)
Impossiblu?
One of the T-80UD turret armour - orange  - ceramics,bluse -RHA,  heavy blue - HHS plate, light blue -cast:

A lot of RHA and HHS and Ceramics. And 4s22 before that.
 
(again -shitty quality of the image by purpose)
 

Yes, and no :-)
 
Remember that wester norms are based on 50% + 1 penetration norm for sucht level, and estern (and former WarPac) are ussaly 75%+1 penetration for sucht level.
What's difffrent?
DM33A1 accoding to polish WITU has 470mm RHA for 2000m (60 slopped) in western - ca 500- 510mm. The difrence is circa 8%.
Maybe this  600mm @60. is for 75%+1 norm so circa  650mm for 50%+1?
 
And the most importatnt - penetration level of "mm RHA" is BS.  It's completly not relevant. 

Yes, and no :-)
 
Remember that wester norms are based on 50% + 1 penetration norm for sucht level, and estern (and former WarPac) are ussaly 75%+1 penetration for sucht level.
What's difffrent?
DM33A1 accoding to polish WITU has 470mm RHA for 2000m (60 slopped) in western - ca 500- 510mm. The difrence is circa 8%.
Maybe this  600mm @60. is for 75%+1 norm so circa  650mm for 50%+1?
 
And the most importatnt - penetration level of "mm RHA" is BS.  It's completly not relevant. 

Meybe this is answer:

 
 
https://imgur.com/werifyQ
 
 
https://imgur.com/ZSbxH61
 
 
https://imgur.com/Qcz1sKq
 
 

Meybe this is answer:

 
 
https://imgur.com/werifyQ
 
 
https://imgur.com/ZSbxH61
 
 
https://imgur.com/Qcz1sKq