Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Belesarius

The interesting ship photos/art thread.

Recommended Posts

Do museum ship photos count? I saw USS Massachusetts posted here earlier.

 

On top of one of the main turrets:

qzXOzNb.jpg

... and underneath it (ammunition carousel?):

jdmY18e.jpg

I got a lot more from my visit there.

Please post them. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to object that the LCS seems a little small to put a nuclear plant on, but it turns out that the smallest boat ever to have a nuclear power source was downright twee:

 

NR-1_986.jpg

 

Take in all 400 tonnes of the NR-1.  The US Navy used this little economy-sized nuclear(!) submarine to fetch wreckage off the bottom of the ocean.  Stuff like AIM-54s from crashed F-14s, and other fancy stuff they wanted to grab before the Rooskies did.

 

The crew conditions were apparently horrible.  You take a 400 tonne submarine and add to it a nuclear boat's ability to remain at sea for weeks or months...

 

Ugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, the NR-1, aka Rickover's personal yacht.

 

IIRC it's got one of the smallest and most power dense cores of any reactor design. It's also got some interesting features, such as [redacted] and [redacted], but [redacted] makes it a bit of a pain to [redacted].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as surface ships go, the USN has made some nuclear powered CGNs (Guided missile Cruisers) as early as the 50s, with the 2 classes ranging in the 10,000 tonnes (The 2 California class CGNs, first launched 1970, first commissioned 1974) to 15,000 tonnes range (the sole Long Beach class CGN, launched 1959, Commissioned 1961.)

 

Now, the Long Beach was decommissioned because it was deemed too expensive to keep running, and while both vessel classes are quite a bit heavier then even the already absurdly overweight LCS classes, I'm sure that reactor technology we have now is probably at least a *tad* cheaper and more efficient then 1950s-1970s era designs and capable of being made more compact right?.....

 

......Colli?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My recollection is that early naval nuclear reactor design was all over the place.  They weren't really sure what they were doing in those days.

 

Thing is, good luck ever finding anyone who knows what the improvements actually are.  Or someone who knows who will talk.  Or figuring it out from any sort of textbook; you can find all sorts of resources on the minutiae of civil boiling water reactor design.  Extrapolating that to fast neutron designs seems dubious.

 

So yeah, it's definitely better now, but I'm not sure exactly in what ways it's better now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×