Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Syrian conflict.

Recommended Posts

https://www.timesofisrael.com/syria-launched-surface-to-surface-rocket-in-response-to-israeli-raid-reports/

 

Israel launched airstrikes for the first time in daylight.

Syria responded for the first time with a surface-surface missile.

 

Israeli Iron Dome missiles intercept the surface-surface missiles, and so far the type of missile was not mentioned.

 

One Syrian report claimed 10 missiles were fired at the Damascus airport and targets near al-Kiswah. Russia later reported that all 7 missiles were intercepted with 100% accuracy. 

Images of impacts should emerge, as usual, in about 2 days.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

First vic (unknown for sure if Pantsir):

7QDBs.png

Appears to be under EW and was targeted by several missiles (one is visible, videofootage from 2nd one was used in video).

 

2392423_1000.jpg

   2nd Pantsir that was shown have radar station in marching positions (off). Not sure how they could find targets while blind, but for some reasons guns are elevated. 

 

   So there were 2 attacks - one during day (video with Buk firing above) and night operation against Syrian AA units.

2393699_original.jpg

 

Spoiler

2394040_original.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TASS:

Quote

   MOSCOW, January 21. / TASS /. As a result of Israel’s night-time strike on Syrian territory, four Syrian soldiers died, six were wounded, and Damascus airport was damaged. This was reported on Monday to reporters at the National Defense Control Center of the Russian Defense Ministry.
   "Four Syrian servicemen were killed, six were wounded. As a result of the strike, the infrastructure of Damascus International Airport was partially damaged," the Center said. They added that "on January 21, 2019, from 02:11 to 02:56, the Israeli air force launched three air strikes on the territory of Syria from the western, south-western and southern directions."
   Syria's air defense units destroyed over 30 Israeli cruise missiles and guided bombs in the course of repelling an attack.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The remaining 3 buildings from that base were destroyed in the strike:

DxaKlhdWwAAS1PK.jpg

 

This is how that base looked like before Operation House of Cards:

Spoiler

dover3.jpeg

 

In the 2nd picture it says not all the buildings were attacked. It also says the ones not attacked, and shown as the targets in today's attack, are a command post, main offices, and a workshop.

 

Another target in the Damascus airport:

DxaKlh8W0AAwLVM.jpg

 

And a list of targets here:

DxaKq1_WwAAnN7C.jpg

 

A total of 6 Syrian AD targets and 4 Quds targets.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Claimed to be parts of Spice 1000

Dxig7qIWkAEyREY.jpg

 

  Reveal hidden contents

model_spice1000.jpg

 

A part of another object:

  Reveal hidden contents

DxZUYl7WoAAaYtM.jpg

 

The writing fits, but the nose doesn't fit. It should be spherical, as the Spice family uses optical sensors, but this one appears not to have any optics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

The writing fits, but the nose doesn't fit. It should be spherical, as the Spice family uses optical sensors, but this one appears not to have any optics.

Nose part is addon piece AFAIK, could be laying around somewhere else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:

Nose part is addon piece AFAIK

Indeed. Spice is a kit fitted on mk 80 series bombs. And that bomb body clearly says mk 83 on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By LoooSeR
      T-14 ARMATA 
      (edited)
              This thread is about glorious russian MBT T-14, known as "Armada", "T-95", "black eagle", "T-99" and other stupid Western names given to Object 148 (T-14 in some recent documents). Here is number of images connected to that vehicle.
       

      Official model of unknown "artillery vehicle". Yeah, Putin, we know that this is T-14. Note Gatling gun on turret right side.
       
      Artist impression of T-14 based on known model, by Fyodor Podporin. 
       

      T-14 will use Relikt ERA, which is considerable improvement over Kontakt-5 in resisting to tandem HEAT warheads and EFPs.

       
      Side skirts would be thicker on a real vehicle, i think. Relikt have AFAIK bigger size than Kontakt-5 ERA build-in blocks.

       
       
       
       
       
      Whole album with renders: 
      http://imgur.com/a/8Tn9b
       
      Video of same render from same artist:

       
       
            People expect that tank would have turret weapon system like what you see on the BMP-3 "Bakhcha-U" turret - a lot of weapons in one turret for one gunner to work with. T-14 is rumored to be equipped with 30 (or even 57) mm autocannon, 4-6 barrel gatling type MG/HMG, new 125 (2A82) or even 152 mm (2A83) smoothbore cannons. Turret is unmanned, crew of 3 would be located in frontal part of hull, behind very serious frontal armor inside of compartment, well protected from all directions. Cannon would be loaded by new autoloading device. I hope that Burevestnik is working on them, those guys managed to make 100 mm Naval gun with RoF of 300 shots per minute.
       
            I really like how turret looks, but i don't understand why there is such a big turret "busket" for unmanned turret with all ammo placed inside of hull in special armored housing. Also, i don't see gunner sight and proposed FSC radar on 3D model (i assume that panoramic sight is for commander). Laser sensors on 3D model are from T-90A variant of "Shtora".
       
            Some officials mentioned works on new active protection system, that consist of powerfull radar station, that can work on "long ranges" and engage incoming projectiles (missiles) with that gatling MG. Will this system survive development stage and be presented on serial tanks is unknown. Although turret for T-15 Armata-based IFV already was shown with new APS "Afganit".
       
            If you pay attention you may see that artist used T-80 rollers for Armata chassis, and this is not a mistake - according to some sources Armata heavy chassis will use T-80 or T-80-like rollers to save weight. And looking at rear part of that tank you may notice a engine deck from gas-turbine equipped version of the T-80, which can be mistake becuase MoD want Armata with new ~1500 HP diesel engine. 
    • By Darjeeling
      Greetings, I have been studying in the battle of Afrin since it started. Yet I still lack some information that can clearly analyse the opposite plan, war progress and order of battle of both side (Turkey army clear but YPG isn’t).
       
      I am spectacular interested in the process of the battle as it revealed the true strength of the 2nd largest NATO army. Also, the performance of YPG/YPJ militant against the regular modern army is meaningful to modern warfare study too.
       
      Hence, any kind man can help me on this field or even just give out a reading list?
×
×
  • Create New...