-
Posts
977 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
22
Reputation Activity
-
Serge got a reaction from Ramlaen in Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) and Euro Main Battle Tank (EMBT)
Leclerc, even in English.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Serge reacted to LoooSeR in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.
Bereg SPG and Rubezh AShM
-
Serge reacted to LoooSeR in General artillery, SPGs, MLRS and long range ATGMs thread.
French CAESAR SPG
-
Serge reacted to Beer in StuG III Thread (and also other German vehicles I guess)
I don't know where to put this. The yearly parlamentary report about the state of Bundeswehr brings a lot of expected but still dreadful numbers. Click on the tweet to get more info. Original document here: https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/679322/afbe4b03e05f1b7b88aa2d657f5d7088/jahresbericht_2019-data.pdf
-
Serge got a reaction from Beer in French flair
At last : 54 120mm rifled mortars are ordered.
http://www.opex360.com/2020/01/24/armee-de-terre-la-commande-de-54-blindes-griffon-dotes-du-mortier-mepac-a-ete-notifiee-par-la-dga/
-
Serge reacted to Ramlaen in NGCV/OMFV. Forwarding to... the past
https://breakingdefense.com/2020/01/bradley-replacement-did-army-ask-for-unobtainium/
-
-
-
-
Serge got a reaction from Karamazov in Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV
Does anyone want to get involved ?
https://www.business.gov.au/cdic/news-for-defence-industry/land-400-phase-3-australian-industry-capability-roadshow
-
Serge got a reaction from SH_MM in NGCV/OMFV. Forwarding to... the past
Let us open a topic dedicated to the Optionally maned fighting vehicle.
What we know now is that we don’t know so much.
What is sure, the US Army :
- wants 9 men strong dismounted section ;
- doesn’t want to continue to share an IFV between two sections when mounted ;
- is awared that it’s complicated to fight with an IFV carrying a 9 men section.
Platforms showed available at AUSA 2018 were :
Griffin III from General Dynamic
CV90 from BAE
Lynx from Rheinmetall
Maybe a proposal from SAIC ?
My point here is the following : I have the strange feeling that there’s a misunderstanding.
During last years, US Army spend lots of money to study new manufacturing process, new designs... and today, when we are looking at news, all we see is old concept.
The Lynx is optimized to be a cost effective platform with proven components. But what is its upgrading capability to stay in services until 2070 ?
CV90 is very good but it got limitations too. It need a deep reworked of its hull.
The Griffin was introduced as the response to the Army call but in fact there’s no other tracked other platform in the GD catalog.
I may be wrong but I can’t see any real disruption.
What about monolithic forged hull ?
What about decoupled running gear ?
Are torsion bars still a solution for suspensions ?
I think, this is the very beginning of the story but it’s very strange.
-
Serge got a reaction from DIADES in NGCV/OMFV. Forwarding to... the past
So, as you know, let’s start again :
https://www.army.mil/article/231775/army_decides_to_cancel_current_omfv_solicitation
-
Serge got a reaction from Beer in General AFV Thread
It said to be a test platform to consider new layout to prepare the the next IFV.
-
Serge got a reaction from Clan_Ghost_Bear in General AFV Thread
It said to be a test platform to consider new layout to prepare the the next IFV.
-
Serge reacted to David Moyes in Britons are in trouble
Marder-like early experimental Warrior with Chobham. 750hp engine.
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/british-chobham-armour-micv.13467/
-
-
Serge reacted to LoooSeR in The Soviet Tank Thread: Transversely Mounted 1000hp Engines
Pretty good pictures of Epokha turret is on previous page. BMP-3 with Epokha turret:
Speaking about BMP-3, here is Iraqi army BMP-3 with addon protection kit:
-
Serge got a reaction from Clan_Ghost_Bear in United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines