Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

COMPETITION Brawling Bobcat: Armored Truck for the Lone Free State (2245)


Sturgeon
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Toxn said:

You'll have to correct me on this, but hitting the requirement with a single shot means something along the lines of a 4.7'/120mm calibre shell.

 

Edit: so, using the 122mm OF-462 shell as a reference, and assuming that the filler weighs the same as TNT, then the minimum you can get away with is 4.5'/115mm, with an all-up shell weight of 50.3lb/22.8kg.

 

It should be equivalent to a 3" shell's filler as I recall, but I can check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is "psft" in ground pressure requirements?

 

Edit:

This is pounds per square feet? But 8 psf is 380 Pa. The ground pressure of human and modern FAVs is ~55 - 70 kPa (8 to 10 psi). The very safe pressure for wheeled vehicles is 170 kPa (25 psi). In case of modern wheeled APCs is around 200 to 350 kPa (29 to 51 psi). In case of human with snowshoes it is ~700 Pa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2020 at 9:46 PM, N-L-M said:

Size is essentially unrestricted, axle load must be below 10 tons (per axle ofc)

 

Axle load with this ground pressure will be much lower. I'll count that.

 

MMP ground pressure formula (in metrics)

 

opony.png

K - constant dependent on number of axles and drive axles

g - gravity (~9,8 m/s^2)

m - weight of vehicle

n - number of axles

d - outer diameter of chosen tires

b - width of chosen tires

(o/h) - tire deflection to height ratio (usually between 0,15 and 0,35)

 

And table regarding the choice of K ratio

 

opony+%25281%2529.png

The top line - number of drive axles

The side lide - number of axles

 

Source: M. Saarilahti, Modelling of the wheel and tyre. 1. Tyre and soil contact, Soil Interaction Model. Appendix Report No. 5, s. 24-29

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far I've counted mass restrictions for 16.9R24 tires (d = 1,333 m, b = 0,44 m), 0.35 ratio and 8 psi maximum ground pressure.

 

4x4 vehicle - 2,5 metric tons

6x6 vehicle - 3,5 metric tons

8x8 vehicle - 4,4 metric tons

10x10 vehicle - 5,2 metric tons

12x12 vehicle - 5,9 metric tons

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zadlo said:

What is "psft" in ground pressure requirements?

 

Edit:

This is pounds per square feet? But 8 psf is 380 Pa. The ground pressure of human and modern FAVs is ~55 - 70 kPa (8 to 10 psi). The very safe pressure for wheeled vehicles is 170 kPa (25 psi). In case of modern wheeled APCs is around 200 to 350 kPa (29 to 51 psi). In case of human with snowshoes it is ~700 Pa.

 

Sorry I was given a bad conversion factor by google. Good eye!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎30‎/‎2020 at 11:56 PM, Zadlo said:

What is "psft" in ground pressure requirements?

 

Edit:

This is pounds per square feet? But 8 psf is 380 Pa. The ground pressure of human and modern FAVs is ~55 - 70 kPa (8 to 10 psi). The very safe pressure for wheeled vehicles is 170 kPa (25 psi). In case of modern wheeled APCs is around 200 to 350 kPa (29 to 51 psi). In case of human with snowshoes it is ~700 Pa.

So I'm struggling to square the figures you've provided here with your formula.

 

If we take the maximum ground pressure (350kPa) and plug it into an 8x8 vehicle, we get something along the lines of a 15mt limit. This seems a bit incongruous when a number of modern 8x8 AFVs are pushing 30mt. Am I just applying this thing wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TokyoMorose said:

I was tempted to mount ye old M135 demolition cannon as a secondary mount to meet the HE requirement while being under armor. I am quite certain the 165mm HEP round would satisfy even the most ardent of rangers.

 

:thispleasesme:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toxn said:

If we take the maximum ground pressure (350kPa) and plug it into an 8x8 vehicle, we get something along the lines of a 15mt limit. This seems a bit incongruous when a number of modern 8x8 AFVs are pushing 30mt. Am I just applying this thing wrong?

 

A bit wrong. For standard 8x8 wheeled APC using 14.0R20 tires the acceptable weight for this ground pressure (I mean 350 kPa) is almost 24 mt (precisely 23,8 mt). For newer vehicles using 16.0R20 tires it is 28,5 mt. On the other side for 13mt SKOT using smaller tires (13.0R18) the ground pressure is 250 MPa.

 

But there's one assumption. This numbers are related to situation where the vehicle goes through untreated, wet terrain f.e. ploughed-up cornfield. On unpaved road the problem exists only when the ground pressure is higher than 400 kPa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zadlo said:

 

A bit wrong. For standard 8x8 wheeled APC using 14.0R20 tires the acceptable weight for this ground pressure (I mean 350 kPa) is almost 24 mt (precisely 23,8 mt). For newer vehicles using 16.0R20 tires it is 28,5 mt. On the other side for 13mt SKOT using smaller tires (13.0R18) the ground pressure is 250 MPa.

 

But there's one assumption. This numbers are related to situation where the vehicle goes through untreated, wet terrain f.e. ploughed-up cornfield. On unpaved road the problem exists only when the ground pressure is higher than 400 kPa.

Thanks. What are the dimensions on the 16.0R20 tires, just so I can double-check my math?

 

Edit: the tires I used are 345/80R20s, which have a total diameter of just over a metre and are 34cm wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2020 at 1:10 PM, Toxn said:

Thanks. What are the dimensions on the 16.0R20 tires, just so I can double-check my math?

 

Edit: the tires I used are 345/80R20s, which have a total diameter of just over a metre and are 34cm wide.

 

16.0R20 has 1.343 meter of diameter and are 43,8 cm wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings all, I've been pulled on as a judge for this one, so none of the following should be construed as competition so much as... encouragement.

 

This is the Mogcat:

T2nIhi4.jpg

TX2sjkE.jpg

ZpEzqkh.jpg

 

It's designed to exactly nail the minimum specs, while being relatively easy to produce and long-legged. It sports a 3"/76mm main gun, a bunch of machineguns and the sort of conveniences you'd expect from a late-40s design (gunner's panoramic sight, wet ammo racks, internal firefighting equipment and smoke launchers). It's otherwise very bare-bones, and comes in at all of 10.3st/9.3mt.

 

I'll add further specs as this goes along, but for the moment all you have to know is that this is the minimum, lowest bar that I can think of. This thing is intended to be the product of unimaginative minds working at what passes for the ordinance department in the Lone Free State - men who spent their lives designing incremental improvements on machineguns and recoilless guns, and think that their lightweight 3" gun is a world-beating novelty.

 

For what it's worth; what I would like to see is something that grabs the requirements by the balls and works out a way to wring something that can beat @N-L-M's Norman design in a reasonably fair fight out of the thin gruel that the Provisional Government has put out. Remember that the Texans don't know what they don't know - their official line is that the arrival of Deseret light tanks is some sort of shocking revelation. But they aren't stupid - the smarter engineers will already be looking at what they could do with their given automotive and gun tech, and what was achieved in the pre-war era, and are probably staying up late at night worrying about their conclusions.

 

Update 1:

I had a think last night, and decided to swap out the turret crew to a commander-loader and gunner configuration instead of the T-34-esque commander-gunner and loader configuration (now included with the rest of the pictures).

 

Here's a bonus picture of the vehicle in travel configuration - turret rearward and gun in cradle:

cLqzQnA.jpg

 

Update 2:

Here's some more stats on the vehicle, in the prescribed units...

 

Description

The Mogcat is a 6x6 armoured scout car designed for mobility and extended operations. The design boasts an innovative engine, drivetrain, suspension package and gun, all built with an eye to ruggedness and light weight. The Mogcat's 3-inch cannon is able to provide useful anti-armour (APHE and HEAT-FS) and anti-infantry (HE, canister and shrapnel shell) firepower, while the plethora of machineguns it sports allows it to tackle dismounted infantry and light vehicles with confidence. The combination of purpose-built drivetrain components, long operational range and firepower makes the Mogcat a strong contender for the present production contract.

 

Major dimensions and mass

Crew: 3 (driver, commander-loader, gunner)

Length: 16'/9" (hull), 19"/4' (gun forward)

Width: 6'/7"m

Height: 9'/6"m (top of commander’s cupola)

Unloaded weight:  8.7 ton

Loaded weight:  10.3 ton

Ground pressure: 4900lb/ft2 (unloaded, muddy ground) to 5785lb/ft2 (loaded, muddy ground)

Axle loading: 3.4t/axle loaded

 

Mobility

Engine: 4-cylinder turbodiesel, 732cu displacement, 200-280HP

PWR: 19.4HP/t loaded, detuned

Ground clearance: 17.7"

Max road speed: 60mph

Max offroad speed: 20mph

Operational range (on road/offroad): 850mi/500mi

 

Protection

 

Armour:

2" LOS on hull front (1" RHA @ 60°)

0.8" LOS on hull sides with 30° angle (0.8" RHA @ 90°, 0.5"mm @ 45°)

0.6" RHA on hull rear

0.5" LOS on hull bottom (0.4" RHA @ 45°)

2" LOS on turret front (1.8" RHA @ 30°)

2" CHA mantlet

0.8" LOS on turret sides with 30° angle (0.6" RHA @ 25°)

0.6" RHA on turret rear

0.4" RHA on roof

0.4" RHA on turret floor

2" RHA turret neck ring and splash guard

0.4" Aluminium turret basket, skeletonised

 

3.2" smoke dischargers (2 reloads).

Fuel tanks on driver’s sides improve protection against threats from the front.

Ammunition stowage in wet racks in turret bustle, turret floor and driver’s compartment.

Internal fire control system (BCF canisters in engine compartment and fighting compartment, driver has access to removable CO2 extinguisher).

 

Firepower

 

Turret ring diameter: 4'/5"

Main gun: 3" L/40 medium-pressure gun, 12" recoil travel

Ammunition stowage: 50 rounds main gun ammunition stowage

+30/-10 degree elevation.

Ammunition:

3"x15.2" cartridge (3.7" base, 19lb max all-up weight)

APHE: 13.9lb, 2425ft/s, 3.5" RHA penetration at 1000m

HEAT-FS: 15.4lb, 2295ft/s, 9.8" penetration

HE: 13.7lb (1.35lb fill), 2460ft/s, 0.4" RHA penetration

APFSDS (spindle-type, 15L/D ratio, maraging steel penetrator): 1.5lb, 5900ft/s, 6.5" RHA penetration at 1000 yards.

Secondary weapons:

.30 cal coaxial MG (600 rnds)

.30 cal gunner's MG (600 rnds)

.50 cal commander’s MG (500 rnds)

 

Additional features

 

Long-range transistor radio.

Vehicle intercom system.

Ancillaries (fire tables, gunner’s quadrant, traverse markings etc) for indirect fire missions.

Commander has access to panoramic sight (x1) and telescopic sight (x4) for target acquisition and lay-on.

Turret traverse is electric (30 degrees per second rotation).

Fume extractor on main gun

Large hatches in hull rear allow easy servicing of engine and gearbox.

Storage lockers in hull rear flanking the engine for personal/supplies stowage.

Hydraulic jacks on the hull bottom between the first and second wheels and at the rear make changing tires easier.

 

Update 3: I reworked all the images.

0hj3Z5n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kal said:

Hedgehog

Wombat

Malkara

 

Return of the JAFT HedgehogWombatMalkara

The design was originally based on Unimog components (although everything except the tires has been changed at this point) and a moggie is an unremarkable cat...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By Sturgeon
      @Toxn
      @Dominus Dolorem
      @Lord_James
      @A. T. Mahan
      @delete013
      @Sten
      @Xoon
      @Curly_
      @N-L-M
      @Sturgeon
       
      detailed below is the expected format of the final submission.
      The date is set as Saturday the 10th of July at 23:59 CST.
      Again, incomplete designs may be submitted as they are and will be judged as seen fit.

      PLEASE REMEMBER ALL ENTRIES MUST BE SUBMITTED IN USC ONLY
       
       
      FINAL SUBMISSION:
      Vehicle Designation and name
       
      [insert 3-projection (front, top, side) and isometric render of vehicle here]
       
      Table of basic statistics:
      Parameter
      Value
      Mass, combat
       
      Length, combat (transport)
       
      Width, combat (transport)
       
      Height, combat (transport)
       
      Ground Pressure, zero penetration
       
      Estimated Speed
       
      Estimated range
       
      Crew, number (roles)
       
      Main armament, caliber (ammo count ready/stowed)
       
      Secondary armament, caliber (ammo count ready/stowed)
       
       
      Vehicle designer’s notes: explain the thought process behind the design of the vehicle, ideas, and the development process from the designer’s point of view.
      Vehicle feature list:
      Mobility:
      1.     Link to Appendix 1 - RFP spreadsheet, colored to reflect achieved performance.
      2.     Engine- type, displacement, rated power, cooling, neat features.
      3.     Transmission - type, arrangement, neat features.
      4.     Fuel - Type, volume available, stowage location, estimated range, neat features.
      5.     Other neat features in the engine bay.
      6.     Suspension - Type, Travel, ground clearance, neat features.
      Survivability:
      1.     Link to Appendix 1 - RFP spreadsheet, colored to reflect achieved performance.
      2.     Link to Appendix 2 - armor array details.
      3.     Non-specified survivability features and other neat tricks - low profile, gun depression, instant smoke, cunning internal arrangement, and the like.
      Firepower:
      A.    Weapons:
      1.     Link to Appendix 1 - RFP spreadsheet, colored to reflect achieved performance.
      2.     Main Weapon-
      a.      Type
      b.      Caliber
      c.      ammunition types and performance (short)
      d.     Ammo stowage arrangement- numbers ready and total, features.
      e.      FCS - relevant systems, relevant sights for operating the weapon and so on.
      f.      Neat features.
      3.     Secondary weapon - Similar format to primary. Tertiary and further weapons- likewise.
      4.     Link to Appendix 3 - Weapon system magic. This is where you explain how all the special tricks related to the armament that aren’t obviously available using 1960s tech work, and expand to your heart’s content on estimated performance and how these estimates were reached.
      B.    Optics:
      1.     Primary gunsight - type, associated trickery.
      2.     Likewise for any and all other optics systems installed, in no particular order.
      C.    FCS:
      1.     List of component systems, their purpose and the basic system architecture.
      2.     Link to Appendix 3 - weapon system magic, if you have long explanations about the workings of the system.
      Fightability:
      1.     List vehicle features which improve its fightability and useability.
      Additonal Features:
      Feel free to list more features as you see fit, in more categories.
      Free expression zone: Let out a big yeehaw to impress the world with your design swagger! Kindly spoiler this section if it’s very long.
       
       Example for filling in Appendix 1
       Example for filling in Appendix 2
       Example for filling in Appendix 3

      GOOD LUCK!
    • By Sturgeon
      The LORD was with the men of Deseret. They took possession of the hill country, but they were unable to drive the people from the plains, because they had chariots of steel.
      —The Book of Latter Day Saints, Ch 8, vs. 3:10, circa 25th Century CE
       
      BULLETIN: ALL INDUSTRIAL-MECHANICAL CONCERNS
       
      SOLICITATION FOR ALL-TERRAIN BATTLE TANK
       
      The Provisional Government of the Lone Free State of Texas and The Great Plains issues the following solicitation for a new All-Terrain Battle Tank. The vehicle will be the main line ground combat asset of the Lone Free State Rangers, and the Texas Free State Patrol, and will replace the ageing G-12 Scout Truck, and fill the role of the cancelled G-42 Scout Truck. The All-Terrain Battle Tank (ATBT) will be required to counter the new Californian and Cascadian vehicles and weapons which our intelligence indicates are being used in the western coast of the continent. Please see the attached sheet for a full list of solicitation requirements.
       

       
      Submissions will be accepted in USC only.
       
       
      Supplementary Out of Canon Information:
       
       
      I.     Technology available:
      a.      Armor:
      The following armor materials are in full production and available for use. Use of a non-standard armor material requires permission from a judge.
      Structural materials:
                                                                    i.     RHA/CHA
      Basic steel armor, 360 BHN. The reference for all weapon penetration figures, good impact properties, fully weldable. Available in thicknesses up to 4 inches (RHA) 8 inches (CHA). 
      Density- 0.28 lb/in^3.
                                                                   ii.     Aluminum 5083
      More expensive to work with than RHA per weight, middling impact properties, low thermal limits. Excellent stiffness.
       Fully weldable. Available in thicknesses up to 4 inches.
      Mass efficiency vs RHA of 1 vs CE, 0.9 vs KE.
      Thickness efficiency vs RHA of 0.33 vs CE, 0.3 vs KE.
      Density- 0.1 lb/in^3 (approx. 1/3 of steel).
      For structural integrity, the following guidelines are recommended:
      For heavy vehicles (30-40 tons), not less than 1 in RHA/1.75 in Aluminum base structure
      For medium-light vehicles (<25 tons), not less than 0.5 in RHA/1 in Aluminum base structure
      Intermediate values for intermediate vehicles may be chosen as seen fit.
      Non-structural passive materials:
                                                                  iii.     HHA
      Steel, approximately 500 BHN through-hardened. Approximately 1.5x as effective as RHA against KE and HEAT on a per-weight basis. Not weldable, middling shock properties. Available in thicknesses up to 1 inch.
      Density- 0.28 lb/in^3
                                                                  iv.     Fuel
      Mass efficiency vs RHA of 1.3 vs CE, 1 vs KE.
      Thickness efficiency vs RHA of 0.14 vs CE, 0.1 vs KE.
      Density-0.03 lb/in^3.
                                                                v.     Assorted stowage/systems
      Mass efficiency vs RHA- 1 vs CE, 0.8 vs KE.
                                                               vi.     Spaced armor
      Requires a face of at least 1 inch LOS vs CE, and at least 0.75 caliber LOS vs fullbore AP KE.
      Reduces penetration by a factor of 1.1 vs CE or 1.05 vs KE for every 4 inchair gap.
      Spaced armor rules only apply after any standoff surplus to the requirements of a reactive cassette.
      Reactive armor materials:
                                                                  vii.     ERA
      A sandwich of 0.125in/0.125in/0.125in steel-explodium-steel.
      Requires mounting brackets of approximately 10-30% cassette weight.
      Must be spaced at least 2 sandwich thicknesses away from any other armor elements to allow full functionality. 81% coverage (edge effects).
                                                                  viii.     NERA
      A sandwich of 0.25in steel/0.25in rubber/0.25in steel.
      Requires mounting brackets of approximately 10-30% cassette weight.
      Must be spaced at least 1 sandwich thickness away from any other armor elements to allow full functionality. 95% coverage.
      The details of how to calculate armor effectiveness will be detailed in Appendix 1.
      b.      Firepower
                                                                    i.     Bofors 57mm (reference weapon) - 85,000 PSI PMax/70,000 PSI Peak Operating Pressure, high quality steel cases, recoil mechanisms and so on are at an equivalent level to that of the USA in the year 1960.
                                                                   ii.     No APFSDS currently in use, experimental weapons only - Spindle sabots or bourelleted sabots, see for example the Soviet BM-20 100mm APFSDS.
                                                                  iii.     Tungsten is available for tooling but not formable into long rod penetrators. It is available for penetrators up to 6 calibers L:D.
                                                                  iv.     Texan shaped charge technology - 4 CD penetration for high-pressure resistant HEAT, 5 CD for low pressure/ precision formed HEAT.
                                                                   v.     The subsidy-approved GPMG for the Lone Free State of Texas has the same form factor as the M240, but with switchable feed direction.. The standard HMG has the same form factor as the Kord, but with switchable feed direction.
      c.       Mobility
                                                                    i.     Engines tech level:
      1.      MB 838 (830 HP)
      2.      AVDS-1790-5A (908 HP)
      3.      Kharkov 5TD (600 HP)
      4.    Detroit Diesel 8V92 (400 HP)
      5.    Detroit Diesel 6V53 (200 HP)
                                                                   ii.     Power density should be based on the above engines. Dimensions are available online, pay attention to cooling of 1 and 3 (water cooled).
                                                                  iii.     Power output broadly scales with volume, as does weight. Trying to extract more power from the same size may come at the cost of reliability (and in the case of the 5TD, it isn’t all that reliable in the first place).
                                                                  iv.     There is nothing inherently wrong with opposed piston or 2-stroke engines if done right.
      d.      Electronics
                                                                    i.     LRFs- unavailable
                                                                   ii.     Thermals-unavailable
                                                                  iii.     I^2- Gen 2 maximum
                                                                  vi.     Texas cannot mass produce microprocessors or integrated circuits
                                                                 vii.    Really early transistors only (e.g., transistor radio)
                                                                viii.    While it is known states exist with more advanced computer technology, the import of such systems are barred by the east coast states who do not approve of their use by militaristic entities.
       
      Armor calculation appendix.
       
      SHEET 1 Armor defeat calculator 4in-54 1200 yd
       
      SHEET 2 Armor defeat calculator 4in-54 2000 yd
       
      SHEET 3 Armor defeat calculator 6in HEAT
       
      Range calculator
       
    • By Toxn
      This is the competition entry thread.
       
      Please submit your complete entries here (all entries will be judged complete when judging begins in the first week of November) and keep the other competition thread for discussion and chatter.
       
      Once judging is complete I will make a post here to discuss the entries and announce a winner.
       
      Best of luck!
       
      Update: final submissions should be in hand by the 22nd of November 2020.
    • By Toxn
      You are an engineer at an Italian locomotive and tractor-making company in early 1943. The writing is on the wall for the Italian army in North Africa, with a lot of equipment having been lost and the enemy on the brink of kicking the axis out of Tunisia and then heading across the Mediterranean. In short, things are looking more than a little desperate. 
       
      However, all is not lost. Il Duce himself has stepped in and, with the assistance of the Germans, procured both some of their finest captured vehicles for use in the upcoming defense of the homeland. Since many of these vehicles have been... gently used, and the existing firms like Ansaldo are flooded with orders, your firm has been asked to work on them in order to bring them up to the standards demanded by modern warfare. 
       
      In addition to these vehicles, the Germans have also graciously agreed to sell weapons from their existing stock of captured equipment, as well as providing production licenses for some of their more modern equipment. You have also been given permission to work with local weapons manufacturers in order to modify existing artillery to suit your needs. Italian automotive and engine manufacturers are similarly available to help. Finally; your firm's experience in locomotives and tractors means that you can modify hulls and put together turrets and turret rings. You can also produce castings (although not very large ones) and weld armour plates.
       
      Your job, which you have no choice but to accept, is to choose a vehicle from among the captured stock being offered for sale, and propose a series of plausible fixes in order to give it a fighting chance against the American and British equipment currently in the field (specifically light tanks and light anti-tank weapons).
       
      It is not foreseen that any of these vehicles will be able to plausibly take on modern medium or heavy designs head-on. Instead, what is wanted are general, implementable improvements to the characteristics of the chosen vehicle. These improvements should be aimed at making these vehicles more useful in the initial battles which are foreseen taking place against airborne and landing forces, in general cooperation with infantry, and as scouts.
       
      The submission should include one or more drawings or blueprints (at least a side view of the vehicle, but preferably a 3-point view and isometric view), a description of the modified vehicle, a description of how the modifications would be accomplished and a description of how the modifications would improve the design overall. The text of the submission should short and descriptive rather than long and exhaustive, and should not exceed 1000 words in total. Images may be photoshopped using existing pictures.
       
      Judging will be done on the basis of plausibility and effectiveness, with innovative solutions being encouraged in order to get the most bang for buck out of the base vehicle. Beyond implementation, the fixes should prioritise combat effectiveness while also improving reliability, crew ergonomics, communication, mobility and protection as much as possible.
       
      The foreign vehicles available for modification are:
      Renault R35 (already in service) Hotchkiss H35/39 Somua S35 (already in use for training purposes) T-26 BT-5 T-28 (only available in very small numbers, so need to be extremely effective) Panzer II Ausf.C  
      The foreign weapons immediately available for purchase are:
      15mm ZB-60 25mm Puteaux and Hotchkiss 3.7cm KPÚV vz. 34/Pak 34 (t) 3.7cm ÚV vz. 38/KwK 38(t)
      3.7cm Pak 36 4.0 cm Pak 192 (e) 45mm M1937 (53-K) 4.7cm KPÚV vz. 38/Pak 38 (t) 47mm APX 7.5cm Pak 97/38 7.62 cm F.K.297(r) and  7.62 cm PaK 39(r) 8.8cm Raketenwerfer 43  
      Licenses are also available for the manufacture of foreign engines (Maybach HL62 TRM, Maybach HL120 TRM and Praga Typ TNHPS/II), periscopes, sights, radios, cupolas and automotive subassemblies. All foreign vehicle weapons, subassemblies and components are available for reverse engineering and manufacture.
       
      IMPORTANT NOTE: This competition hasn't been finalised, and is waiting on your input! Vote to participate by giving this topic a 'controversial' (grapefruit-induced tears being the only currency of value), and if we get enough participants we'll pull the trigger. Ask any questions you want below, and when/if the competition goes forwards I will make a new thread for entries.
       
      Edit: thanks to excellent feedback, the competition proposal has been somewhat edited. If you want an idea of what my mindset is here, read up on the battle of Gela (bearing in mind that the wikipedia entry is shite) and ask how much better the counter-attack could have gone if the Italian vehicles had been equipped with radios and had the ability to move faster than jogging speed.
       
      Edit 2: since I failed to mention this above - this is not a one-man, one-entry sort of competition (although I'm not keen on the ten-men, one entry approach either).
      If you have two good ideas then you can submit twice. The only rules are not to test my patience and to keep it within the bounds of good taste.
×
×
  • Create New...