Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Mighty_Zuk

Israeli AFVs

Recommended Posts

IDF set to equip a 3rd infantry brigade (Givati) with the Namer, having a first battalion operational in Q4 2018, and by 2020 the whole brigade will operationally use the Namer.

Just a pic for fun:

 

namer2.jpeg?anchor=center&mode=crop&widt

 

Nahal brigade, one of 5 main active infantry brigades, will receive soon the Eitan APC/IFV. It was unspecified when, but it's probably going to be 2018 or 2019. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eitan and new years' update

 
It's been a while since news came about any major development in AFVs in Israel. We're kept in the dark for now, about the artillery project, which seems to be delayed until inspection by the MoD is finished regarding corruption allegations.
 

Eitan

  • Costs half the price of a Namer.
  • Costs 1/10th the engine-time of a Namer.
  • Reached well over 100km/h on trials but may be limited to 60km/h in transportation mode as it's expected to drive on highways in emergency time rather than on HETs (Heavy Equipment Transporters). But the speed governor could also be removed when needed.
  • MANTAK will present this month its recommendations for an APS for the Eitan - Iron Fist or Trophy, a decision said to be worth hundreds of millions of shekels (Every Trophy system costs 1 million shekels roughly, which is 300,000 USD).
  • ERA as well as the passive composite armor are said to be sufficient against current threats.
  • 3 screens are located inside the vehicle - 2 large "21 screens for the commander and driver, and 1 smaller one by the rear door.
  • Engine could come from either MTU or Caterpillar.
  • Initial operation capability in 2019.

What this means

  • For now a total of 500 Namers are planned. Some in service and some in production, albeit slow one. For the same price as another 500 (originally the IDF wanted 800 or more), over 1000 Eitans could be acquired which makes them more open to auxiliary duties such as mortar carriage, repair and maintenance, recovery and more, where the Namer would be too expensive. And since these duties require no turret and no APS, it could cost even 1/3rd as much as the Namer.
  • Training a battalion worth of Namers would cost as much as 3 brigades of Eitans. Impressive savings, but these can be attributed probably to the fact the Namer's engine is the old AVDS-1790 which in its early iterations served the Patton tanks.
  • No comment here, other than it being odd that they just gave it a top speed of 90km/h at first when it could do well over that. Previously they gave it a governed speed of 50km/h I believe, which now changed to 60km/h. Perhaps some automotive improvements they didn't disclose.
  • This is a big one - we were promised way back in 2014 that RAFAEL and IMI will set aside their former rivalry in this exact topic but it seems now that the next generation of APS will no longer be a combination of both their systems, and rather would be another competition between the two. I don't know yet whether this is good or bad, but I do feel some disappointment.
  • When talking about the Eitan, the military officials and media always refer to just one incident - the Shujaiya (Gaza) rocket attack that killed 7 men in an M113 troops transporter. The rocket was an RPG-29 (PG-29V). So if the IDF claims the Eitan can, without an APS, resist the RPG-29, then by all means this is an impressive feat. Generous claims are for 600mm penetration after ERA, and 750mm without ERA, which is quite substantial.
  • Just like the Merkava 4, but unlike the Namer, the Eitan will have the BMS Tzayad (Hunter, marketed by Elbit as Torch) integrated into the main computer, laying everything on one screen in front of the commander. Though judging by the photos below alone, it's not yet obvious where the gunner's display is.
  • Which probably means that an electric or hybrid engine is now off the table. The available offerings right now are: C18 and 6V 890
 
 

11.png
Eitan
12.jpg
Namer
 
 
And for the first time in ever, the IDF released some statistics on its acquisition this year. It's not much, actually not enough even, but it's something. 
 
 
The only two important bits are that the Merkava 4 and Namer are both produced at a rate of 30 vehicles per year, each. This makes sense for the Namer, which is due to have the 500th unit delivered by 2027, which means today there are ~200 units, but that's a really low number. At peak production, the plant could produce 120 Merkava tanks a year. And that was more than 30 years ago.
 
And that's it for today!
 
 
Source:
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Namer CEV (Combat Engineering Vehicle), also known in Hebrew as Namera, did its first exercise with the 7th brigade.

 

Unfortunately with only 30 units produced per year, of Namer in all variants, it's going to take a long while.

 

Meanwhile, here's footage of that exercise:

 

https://a7.org/media/a7radio/misc/video/18/jan/WhatsApp0901.mp4

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Serge said:

Namera was the name of the ARV too, no ?

There was and still is a lot of confusion about it. First it was the name of the prototype, then the name of the ARV, and now the name of the CEV. But the ARV is no more.

 

Besides, Namera as a CEV does make sense for Hebrew speakers. It could stand for Namer Handasa (engineering).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is something I haven't discussed and frankly don't know the answer to:

 

Why do Merkava 4M tanks have mounts for the ELAWS but don't have anything mounted on them?

This custom predates the Merkava 4M actually. Many Merkava 4 tanks keep the mounts empty as well.

What I have noticed is that in its sole major deployment - the 2006 war in Lebanon, they all had it. And it did its job well. There were no complaints about it.

But afterwards, especially in exercises, I noticed they didn't bother mounting them. And they didn't put them on in the 2014 operation in Gaza.

 

So there are 2 questions:

 

1)Why remove the ELAWS if it was already bought in large quantities and had no issues?

2)Why keep the mounts in even brand new made tanks?

 

The Trophy probably nullifies the need for this system, so it doesn't make sense to keep making these mounts.

 

The tank you see here is just a little over a year old:

DSC_7598-768x507.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Graduation video:

 

 

26170111_1783538008615585_87935498233533

 

26114572_1783538038615582_17616151543005

 

Part of a recent propaganda series to educate people on the role of the armored corps due to its decline in recent years. This time they show a live operational firing on 3 targets in a Hamas outpost. You can see that the rear hatch is open all along, and they immediately get out to celebrate for operational firing with their friends. Quite an absurd situation, really, but when you're based just a couple kilometers or even hundreds of meters from the border fence, that's just the reality.

 

https://he-il.facebook.com/2055812101320752/videos/2085466998355262/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×