Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Syrian conflict.

Recommended Posts

http://ria.ru/world/20150930/1293841277.html#ixzz3nEGpNHjO

 

Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk called for an urgent response of the international community on the issue of Russia's military operation in Syria.  :wacko:

 

"The decision of the Federation Council of the Russian President for permission to send troops to any country in the world - it is a step in the destruction of the global security system".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://ria.ru/world/20150930/1293841277.html#ixzz3nEGpNHjO

 

Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk called for an urgent response of the international community on the issue of Russia's military operation in Syria.  :wacko:

 

"The decision of the Federation Council of the Russian President for permission to send troops to any country in the world - it is a step in the destruction of the global security system".

"I am Syrian myself, from Raqqa, the daughter of a Mujahid. Believe me, it is not so simple, nobody wants Russians bomb ISIS"

 

So, when Poroshenko will do his another Je Suis <X>? Like, "Je Suis ISIS"?  :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I already posted similar map here many pages ago. It was like this sinse... 2012/13, i think.

Nah. It's the same reaction I have whenever I look at a map of Syria. I always have to take the time to make sure one of the factions doesn't include Zoroastrian Space Mollusk from the Empire of Skruub the Magnificent or the Undead Czech Legion from 1919.

 

Russian pilots in Syria:

 

438069.jpg

 

 

 

:ph34r:

 

Mr. Bean is now a Russkie pilot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One must really wonder that did somebody expect Russia to NOT hit whatever they or Assad like? According to my twitterfeed several "journalists" are surprised.

 

In discussions in Russian forums, one of possible strategy that we [Russia] can use is pressurizing rebels/insurgents/criminals groups by force to get into diplomatic talks. Jihadists/Islamists main organisations like ISIS and Nusra Front are left for major fight after that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'd totally get that. What international media fails to recoqnize is the bottom line of Russia being there on the call of the only legitimate ruler of the country. Because thats what Assad is, do they like it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'd totally get that. What international media fails to recoqnize is the bottom line of Russia being there on the call of the only legitimate ruler of the country. Because thats what Assad is, do they like it or not.

   Those medias are living on other planet, i no longer pay attention to them as they are just pre-made opinion to help media owner to push his idea/view/agenda/etc through wrapping real events into "right" flavor to feed population.

   There are several people in otvaga forums, for example, that have direct connection to Syrians, there are interesting experts on ME here, as well, that actually tries to see sophisticated texture of region. Major english-language medias just don't bother with that, their narrative is that Assad from being normal ME country leader in pre-2010/11, became evil kid murderer in a month. And they will never fully admit their major mistakes, anyway.

   Funnily enough, one of possible events, that our military experts were little bit afraid, was a possibility of coup against Assad by military high ranks to put a hardline politician into power.

 

   Assad is much more legitimate leader of Syrian state than Poroshenko (aka "30 percent") in Ukraine, for example. But Poroshenko is democratical leader, waging war with part of his own country over federalisation question in civil war-like conflict, while Assad is terrible dictator for waging war over part of his country in civil war-like conflict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By LoooSeR
      T-14 ARMATA 
      (edited)
              This thread is about glorious russian MBT T-14, known as "Armada", "T-95", "black eagle", "T-99" and other stupid Western names given to Object 148 (T-14 in some recent documents). Here is number of images connected to that vehicle.
       

      Official model of unknown "artillery vehicle". Yeah, Putin, we know that this is T-14. Note Gatling gun on turret right side.
       
      Artist impression of T-14 based on known model, by Fyodor Podporin. 
       

      T-14 will use Relikt ERA, which is considerable improvement over Kontakt-5 in resisting to tandem HEAT warheads and EFPs.

       
      Side skirts would be thicker on a real vehicle, i think. Relikt have AFAIK bigger size than Kontakt-5 ERA build-in blocks.

       
       
       
       
       
      Whole album with renders: 
      http://imgur.com/a/8Tn9b
       
      Video of same render from same artist:

       
       
            People expect that tank would have turret weapon system like what you see on the BMP-3 "Bakhcha-U" turret - a lot of weapons in one turret for one gunner to work with. T-14 is rumored to be equipped with 30 (or even 57) mm autocannon, 4-6 barrel gatling type MG/HMG, new 125 (2A82) or even 152 mm (2A83) smoothbore cannons. Turret is unmanned, crew of 3 would be located in frontal part of hull, behind very serious frontal armor inside of compartment, well protected from all directions. Cannon would be loaded by new autoloading device. I hope that Burevestnik is working on them, those guys managed to make 100 mm Naval gun with RoF of 300 shots per minute.
       
            I really like how turret looks, but i don't understand why there is such a big turret "busket" for unmanned turret with all ammo placed inside of hull in special armored housing. Also, i don't see gunner sight and proposed FSC radar on 3D model (i assume that panoramic sight is for commander). Laser sensors on 3D model are from T-90A variant of "Shtora".
       
            Some officials mentioned works on new active protection system, that consist of powerfull radar station, that can work on "long ranges" and engage incoming projectiles (missiles) with that gatling MG. Will this system survive development stage and be presented on serial tanks is unknown. Although turret for T-15 Armata-based IFV already was shown with new APS "Afganit".
       
            If you pay attention you may see that artist used T-80 rollers for Armata chassis, and this is not a mistake - according to some sources Armata heavy chassis will use T-80 or T-80-like rollers to save weight. And looking at rear part of that tank you may notice a engine deck from gas-turbine equipped version of the T-80, which can be mistake becuase MoD want Armata with new ~1500 HP diesel engine. 
    • By Darjeeling
      Greetings, I have been studying in the battle of Afrin since it started. Yet I still lack some information that can clearly analyse the opposite plan, war progress and order of battle of both side (Turkey army clear but YPG isn’t).
       
      I am spectacular interested in the process of the battle as it revealed the true strength of the 2nd largest NATO army. Also, the performance of YPG/YPJ militant against the regular modern army is meaningful to modern warfare study too.
       
      Hence, any kind man can help me on this field or even just give out a reading list?
×
×
  • Create New...