Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

Quote

Infantry fighting vehicle object 695 on medium tracked platform Kurganets-25

ÐÐ¾ÐµÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ñина пеÑоÑÑ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑ 695 на ÑÑедней гÑÑениÑной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑÑганеÑ-25 (Infantry fighting vehicle object 695 on medium tracked platform Kurganets-25)

 

Spoiler

ÐÐ¾ÐµÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ñина пеÑоÑÑ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑ 695 на ÑÑедней гÑÑениÑной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑÑганеÑ-25 (Infantry fighting vehicle object 695 on medium tracked platform Kurganets-25)

 

ÐÐ¾ÐµÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ñина пеÑоÑÑ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑ 695 на ÑÑедней гÑÑениÑной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑÑганеÑ-25 (Infantry fighting vehicle object 695 on medium tracked platform Kurganets-25)

 

ÐÐ¾ÐµÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ñина пеÑоÑÑ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑ 695 на ÑÑедней гÑÑениÑной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑÑганеÑ-25 (Infantry fighting vehicle object 695 on medium tracked platform Kurganets-25)

 

 

Quote

Main battle tank T-14 object 148 on heavy unified tracked platform Armata

Танк Т-14 обÑÐµÐºÑ 148 на ÑÑжелой гÑÑениÑной ÑниÑиÑиÑованной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑмаÑа (Main battle tank T-14 object 148 on heavy unified tracked platform Armata)

 

Spoiler

Танк Т-14 обÑÐµÐºÑ 148 на ÑÑжелой гÑÑениÑной ÑниÑиÑиÑованной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑмаÑа (Main battle tank T-14 object 148 on heavy unified tracked platform Armata)

 

Танк Т-14 обÑÐµÐºÑ 148 на ÑÑжелой гÑÑениÑной ÑниÑиÑиÑованной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑмаÑа (Main battle tank T-14 object 148 on heavy unified tracked platform Armata)

 

Танк Т-14 обÑÐµÐºÑ 148 на ÑÑжелой гÑÑениÑной ÑниÑиÑиÑованной плаÑÑоÑме ÐÑмаÑа (Main battle tank T-14 object 148 on heavy unified tracked platform Armata)

 

Quote

Self-propelled gun 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV

СÐУ 2С35 ÐоалиÑиÑ-СР(Self-propelled gun 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV)

 

Spoiler

СÐУ 2С35 ÐоалиÑиÑ-СР(Self-propelled gun 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV)

 

СÐУ 2С35 ÐоалиÑиÑ-СР(Self-propelled gun 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV)

 

СÐУ 2С35 ÐоалиÑиÑ-СР(Self-propelled gun 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

So which do we think there are currently more of in existence.....T-14 Armatas or BM Oplots? 

 

Just curious.

T-14 Armata. Although the Oplot is the only one actually in service, though only in Thailand and not Ukraine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Serge said:

Does anyone know the pilot position of the final Kurganets-25 configuration ?

 ̶W̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶d̶o̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶m̶e̶a̶n̶?̶
̶T̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶h̶a̶s̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶n̶g̶e̶d̶ ̶(̶d̶r̶i̶v̶e̶r̶ ̶l̶e̶f̶t̶,̶ ̶c̶o̶m̶m̶a̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ ̶r̶i̶g̶h̶t̶)̶.̶

 

Nevermind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Serge said:

Does anyone know the pilot position of the final Kurganets-25 configuration ?

Test vehicles (not parade mock ups) have driver on the left front with engine warming up his right shoulder.

C0Ms4BuXUAAM1b-.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

Remember this 3d model posted for otvaga with Armata possible looks?

vytlBcm.jpg

 

From UVZ slideshow, Kurganets with similar turret:

http://s4.uploads.ru/d/Y75Tu.jpg

 

 

Is this somewhat a BMPT Kurganets then?

Or a TD variant with an unusual secondary layout

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Zyklon said:

Is this somewhat a BMPT Kurganets then?

Or a TD variant with an unusual secondary layout

This is not BMPT, it is called as a SPG in document. Possibly light tank or Sprut-SD-like vehicle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T-15 should be more in-line with BMPT, but if you're going to mount that turret on one, you might as well just go with a T-14.  Kurganets makes a little more sense as a lighter gun carrier. 

 

Any concept images like above and in the Russian tank thread for the T-15?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Scolopax said:

T-15 should be more in-line with BMPT, but if you're going to mount that turret on one, you might as well just go with a T-14.  Kurganets makes a little more since as a lighter gun carrier. 

 

Any concept images like above for the T-15?

 

No. There is only artist impression of T-15 with 57 mm AC that i know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By seppo
      Hello,
      this is my first post. Please no bully. :3
       
      Panzerkampfwagen 2000
      In 1988 Germany developed a concept for a tank with two crew men. In order to test whether it's possible for only two crew men to operate a tank effectively, a Leopard 1 and a Leopard 2 were modified. 


      Field trials were held in 1990 and subsequently it was concluded to be a viable concept in 1992. The project was however canceled, because the downfall of the Soviet Union meant, that a new battle tank was no longer needed. Furthermore Israel stealing submarines and reunification meant that the budget was not sufficient either.
       
      Neue Gepanzerte Plattform
      In 1995 a concept for a whole family of armored vehicles(SPAAG, MBT, IFV) was developed, where the MBT would be manned by two man, just like the Panzerkampfwagen 2000. A prototype was build and tested in 1997. However a further budget cut lead to the cancellation in 1998. Wegmann desgin: Turret + autoloader:
      http://www.patent-de.com/pdf/DE19644524A1.pdf
      Diehl developed an APS for this tank: AWiSS


      EGS:
      Hull length = 8,67m
      Full width = 3,98m
      Width between the tracks = 3,5m
      Height = 2,71m
      The intended combat weight for the complete tank was between 55t and 77t.
      Can anyone calculate the the cross section areas and the protection levels for the front and the side, assuming mid-90s filler materials were used?
       
      Thanks for your attention!
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?
    • By LoooSeR
      Well, we have thread about Yemen conflict and Ukrainian war, so in light of recent changes in situation in Syria, this thread became relevant enough, IMO.
       
       

       

×