Serge

Commonality is good but a dedicated rear engin Lynx chassis would have been far better. 
The legacy Lynx is too much high, too much heavy to carry such a turret. 

Commonality is good but a dedicated rear engin Lynx chassis would have been far better. 
The legacy Lynx is too much high, too much heavy to carry such a turret. 

Commonality is good but a dedicated rear engin Lynx chassis would have been far better. 
The legacy Lynx is too much high, too much heavy to carry such a turret. 

At war, protection is statistical. 
You’re not only facing the highest threat but the whole one which starts with rifles. 
The more you can face, the better this is. 

Lynx 120 fire support vehicle, featuring a new 120 mm smoothbore gun derived from the Leopard 2's main armament. Also features a Natter 12.7 RWS and the SEOSS-2P commander's sight.

Jag with slat armor

 
Some pics of Jag from this twitter

 
 
Gunner position:
 
Commander's position:
 
Driver's station:
 

More Hanwha Redback promo/propaganda 
 
 

Russian take on high speed amphibious vehicle 
 

 

 

Some photos of Leo 2A7V in Norway:
 

 

BMP-3 cold weather starting tests, but interesting bits are add-ons for tracks to make them wider and uparmor kit.
 
 

Few more pics in his next tweet.

Mockup of Sigma howitzer.

If there are lessons to be learned from the self-propelled artillery trials, my answer would be that the importance of some of the more "unsexy" factors such as reliability, ease of use and ease of maintenance  should not be underestimated. Those are a boon to any army, of course, but they're especially important to one that still relies upon conscription to fill out its ranks.
 
Edit: Currently, Norwegian tank squadrons are mostly made up of enlisted troops, though, but this will likely not be the case with the new ones they’re planning to raise.

It’s not compulsory to have competitors fitted with ADS to have a good evaluation. 
ADS is just an option. There is too many things to already test (mobility, fire power...)
I’ve heard there is another ADS solution on tracks too. 

It’s a shopped A7DK photo (they’ve added PERI RTWL and SAAB cameras), but it probably gives a reasonable impression of how an A7NO is going to look like.

That's a weird prototype of the Leopard 2A7DK.

Absolutely. Korea awarded a development contract with Chrysler (eventually became General Dynamics Land Systems hence on most pictures of the XK1s have GDLS marked on them) for a tank which would eventually become the K1. 
 
You can get a general overview of the development from this page scan from Janes IDR:
 
 
XK1 PV-1 and PV-2:
 

This vehicle was essentially an AMPV with a Bradley turret. BAE offered to the US Army a hull swap upgrade in a similar fashion to how flat bottom Strykers are converted into double V hull, disassembling the vehicles and reassembling them with the new base hull + other upgraded parts. Yes a 'turretless Bradley' being given a turret as Bradley upgrade is quite funny.
 
The A4 upgrade for Bradleys are M2A3 with both the ECP (engineering change proposal) upgrades.
-MOD 6 (BFVS Track and Suspension Modification) - Provides funding to support procurement and fielding of the Track and Suspension Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) to the Bradley Vehicle fleet. The Track and Suspension field modifications include track and suspension system upgrades that help to alleviate mobility, force protection, and system survivability deficiencies. Costs associated with kit installations are included in the funding for the prime hardware contracts.
-MOD 7 (BFVS Mobility Modifications) - Provides funding to support procurement and fielding of Bradley A4 variant vehicles. In addition to vehicles, funding supports the procurement of government furnished material, engineering support related to production, and fielding. The M2A4/M7A4 Bradley regain lost capability due to added weight by upgrading the powerpack and drivetrain systems. The A4 improves the electrical system to enable hosting of inbound technologies from other Army Programs of Record.
 
 
 
 
Visually it is very hard to tell an A4 from an A3 since many A3 have the first ECP upgrade and the new double pin tracks.

No. 
The A4 is simpler. 

AMPV very first delivery :

 

Next year, French Army will receive :
- 119 VBMR Griffon (339 already delivered) ;
- first 18 Jaguar EBRC ;
- first 80 Serval VBMR-L ;
- first 4 retrofited Leclerc MBT.
https://www.forcesoperations.com/contrat-encore-rempli-pour-le-gme-scorpion/

Next year, French Army will receive :
- 119 VBMR Griffon (339 already delivered) ;
- first 18 Jaguar EBRC ;
- first 80 Serval VBMR-L ;
- first 4 retrofited Leclerc MBT.
https://www.forcesoperations.com/contrat-encore-rempli-pour-le-gme-scorpion/