Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Britons are in trouble


Mighty_Zuk

Recommended Posts

On 7/16/2021 at 9:16 PM, Korvette said:
 

I would like some feedback but imo this gives a pretty good insight to the tanks turret, I will be maybe working on a full analysis of the turret mantlet soon if I feel like it to see an accurate representation of its armor

 

unknown-6.png

 

there not much to "analyze" LOS without backplate us 700-ish so... mantlet is simple weakspot without any magic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

 

unknown-6.png

 

there not much to "analyze" LOS without backplate us 700-ish so... mantlet is simple weakspot without any magic

It's definitely sub 700 no matter what.

 

The air gap far exceeds the LOS of the front mantlet piece of the set up with some basic measuring, and consider that you can see the diameter of the trunnion in the turret shell photos it's very mediocre, so sub 600mm effective LOS down to 550. The trunnion is probably cast too considering the shape...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

Watching the mythology of Challenger 2 collapse finally after all these years has been deeply satisfying to me.

Won't collapse yet for a fair bit. So many are still holding onto that mantlet, the suspension making the tank mobile, the 'dorchester', the L27 being a mythical round, the LFP not being an existent target. A tank failing in trials is somehow okay but a tank 'failing' in combat is indicative of bad design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Korvette said:

Won't collapse yet for a fair bit. So many are still holding onto that mantlet, the suspension making the tank mobile, the 'dorchester', the L27 being a mythical round, the LFP not being an existent target. A tank failing in trials is somehow okay but a tank 'failing' in combat is indicative of bad design.

 

Idk man it seems to be largely falling apart to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

 

Idk man it seems to be largely falling apart to me.

To anyone that's got even a remotely trained eye the CR2 was already atrocious, at least that's what I assumed, I was thinking more about the regular person still has that image probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Korvette said:

To anyone that's got even a remotely trained eye the CR2 was already atrocious, at least that's what I assumed, I was thinking more about the regular person still has that image probably.

 

Yeah you're right about that. Maybe I just hang out too much here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

i'm only about turret, mantlet is simple 50mm RHA(or even less) + rotor(cradle) which can't be much thciker than 200-250mm

 

img_0047.jpg

 

img_0048.jpg

 

img_0052.jpg

 

hbqkyAPaOIY.jpg?size=2326x2160&quality=9

 

those "v" shaped weldments on mantlet also strange...

 

c98LIkdWDdg.jpg?size=1814x1361&quality=9

 

LnmK5Pnk9qs.jpg?size=1814x1361&quality=9

 

IKS-XXcl77M.jpg?size=1100x618&quality=96

 

 

Oh I get it now. 
 

Very nice photos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

 

Yeah you're right about that. Maybe I just hang out too much here.

Though I still do see what you mean, I've noticed a lot of people sometimes realizing some of the infinite disadvantages the CR2 has on its belt compared to any other MBT, but not many people.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sturgeon said:

 

Not sure I'm seeing it.

Spoiler

unknown.png?width=1153&height=670

 

360mm cast armor + the front piece which is 2/3rds hollow so around -50-100mm RHA (hopefully RHA) sloped based on the photos wiedz posted, you get not enough armor to stop any soviet/russian round after the 90's into the 2000s and beyond. And a jammed elevation drive.

 

This isn't including that it basically takes up 1/3rd of the total turret face of the tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sturgeon said:

Oh sure I thought there was something else illuminating in those photos we hadn't established.

No it was just the mantlet he was outlining, I assume.

 

But in general what hasn't been established to be bad about the tank, it's quite hard to jeer the tank now sometimes since its all already known stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...