Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!


Khand-e
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, DeXM said:

I try to "filter" the information as much as my current awareness level allows.

I will give an example with a transmission: Yes, I found mention that 99a - three reversing transmission (what I wrote earlier), however, I did not find full-fledged documentary evidence (or I simply did not find the place where This could be done, due to the fact that I still can not fully read in Chinese). Therefore, you have to collect the information "on the grains".

P. S. wanted to ask what is the real limit on the length of the UPFSD used for autoloaders 99 and 99a? 740mm from after refinement, as on Soviet and Russian tanks, or will it be the opportunity to use the APFSDS even greater elongation? Also, I would like to ask if there are information about future projectiles that should replace the APFSDS Phase 3 (DTC10-125)?

PS: Which means that DTC-10-125 is probably a little bit inferior when comparing its performance with DM53 and 3BM59, while fanboys on weibo, tieba, and other Chinese social medias and forums just brainlessly repeat: "it can penetrate 1000mm of RHA" again and again....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TINDALOS said:

PS: Which means that DTC-10-125 is probably a little bit inferior when comparing its performance with DM53 and 3BM59, while fanboys on weibo, tieba, and other Chinese social medias and forums just brainlessly repeat: "it can penetrate 1000mm of RHA" again and again....

I saw photos, and even video with DTC10-125.

In my opinion, the projectile is very powerful. If these "measurements" are correct, then, at the initial speed of 1780-1800 meters per second, this shell can already exceed 3BM60 (with its initial flight speed of 1660 meters)
. So we may expect at least 300mm+/60


 

Spoiler

J1HRnbZ2Bik.jpg?size=800x1600&quality=96



 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Wiedzmin said:

in what universe you live ? 634mm core in 654mm round where Svinets is 735mm overall round...

 

DlOWIyHSGbM.jpg?size=900x322&quality=96&

 

it's even shorter that Mango-M

Yes, the length confuses me. Nevertheless, I did not find detailed measurements, so I use those data that is. There is also a measure of the APFSDS Phase 2. Looks more real, in my opinion, taking into account photo with both rounds

 

Spoiler

rLt3tBqKDFM.jpg?size=640x1192&quality=96&sign=7b2046f4269c7ea4c18f77399dd7b8a4&type=album

 

 

Spoiler

eJ-Z3-374Wc.jpg?size=405x720&quality=96&

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DeXM said:

And I would like to clarify whether there is more than one photo?
 

  Hide contents

Hj7iIyXOSdg.jpg?size=690x726&quality=96&



 

The article in this photo is a total bullshit written by some high school kiddo, Object 477 himself criticized it HARD. Ask him for detail of the whole thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DeXM said:

I saw photos, and even video with DTC10-125.

In my opinion, the projectile is very powerful. If these "measurements" are correct, then, at the initial speed of 1780-1800 meters per second, this shell can already exceed 3BM60 (with its initial flight speed of 1660 meters)
. So we may expect at least 300mm+/60


 

  Hide contents

J1HRnbZ2Bik.jpg?size=800x1600&quality=96



 


 

yes, official data is 680mm RHA pen. And also, DTC-10-125 does not have a ballistic cap (similar to DM53 and M829A3/4)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DeXM said:

And I would like to clarify whether there is more than one photo?
 

  Hide contents

Hj7iIyXOSdg.jpg?size=690x726&quality=96&



 

In the bullshitery article, the description below reads "This is the UFP of VT4". Howecer, it is in fact VT-4's turret armour module.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SuperComrade said:

I wonder if the Chinese intend to transition towards bustle-style autoloaders like the West or are they satisfied with the carousel autoloaders?

For now, it is bustle for 15 (with a 105 gun) and carousel for 96/99. In the near future? Probably something similar to the T-14, umanned turret plus carousel I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DeXM said:

And I would like to clarify whether there is more than one photo?
 

  Reveal hidden contents

Hj7iIyXOSdg.jpg?size=690x726&quality=96&



 

The article in the picture is a perfect example on why most of the contents on various Chinese defence related magazines are pure garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, SuperComrade said:

I wonder if the Chinese intend to transition towards bustle-style autoloaders like the West or are they satisfied with the carousel autoloaders?

 

Of all the western tanks only Leclerc has bustle autoloader. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some consider the K2, Type 90 and Type 10 as "western"

If not geographically rather in design philosophy.

 

(That and various prototype that never entered service, or some early cold war vehicles)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

The article in this photo is a total bullshit written by some high school kiddo, Object 477 himself criticized it HARD. Ask him for detail of the whole thing.

 

6 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

In the bullshitery article, the description below reads "This is the UFP of VT4". Howecer, it is in fact VT-4's turret armour module.

 

 

4 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

The article in the picture is a perfect example on why most of the contents on various Chinese defence related magazines are pure garbage.

 

Thanks for clarifying the situation

I'll try to find out more details and information
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Beer said:

 

Of all the western tanks only Leclerc has bustle autoloader. 


Well, Leclerc is the only Western main battle tank with an autoloader in service, I think? Though the experimental designs like the 140 mm CATTB and Leo 2s had bustle autoloaders too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, DeXM said:

Yes, the length confuses me. Nevertheless, I did not find detailed measurements, so I use those data that is. There is also a measure of the APFSDS Phase 2. Looks more real, in my opinion, taking into account photo with both rounds

 

  Reveal hidden contents

rLt3tBqKDFM.jpg?size=640x1192&quality=96&sign=7b2046f4269c7ea4c18f77399dd7b8a4&type=album

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

eJ-Z3-374Wc.jpg?size=405x720&quality=96&

 

All variant of 96 and 99 still retains that old autoloader, DTC-10-125 is the best thing they can get with the projectile length limitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

All variant of 96 and 99 still retains that old autoloader, DTC-10-125 is the best thing they can get with the projectile length limitation.

Are there any perspective APFSDS development processes?

Also found video from VT, but  on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military

Spoiler

Also found video from W, but, alas, on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military



I found some comparison for BM Oplot and VT-4.
It says about CH1000B transmisson.

Spoiler

Mt966NLudqc.jpg?size=1364x812&quality=96


Previosly, I saw some photos

 

Spoiler

https://sun9-27.userapi.com/impg/vhGFJRoN9WU2k42cq01GSH9ULNmPl8cNxDp0Vw/I_JBBgWZFyI.jpg?size=2160x1620&quality=96&sign=2599cce4e1bab968919939a90923c3ba&type=album

 

 

 

 

 

Spoiler

https://sun9-19.userapi.com/impg/zn6DZRAD-oVoLyMnSdqWVQH6SceuxwAZOYlXFw/FRkz8ifBH7o.jpg?size=2560x1920&quality=96&sign=db05f22ec2ea78f40dd598c6fb930c08&type=album

 

 

So, it says about CH1000B too.

Is it possible that the difference between the CH1000 (99a) from the CH1000B (vT4) is that on 99A (presumably, since I still did not find documentary evidence or video with a demonstration) - three reverse speeds transmission, unlike two at VT?


And I'd like to clarify if theres full video of this screenshot?

Spoiler

WUeA9JGu7ZY.jpg?size=600x401&quality=96&sign=8aa589693cda691e0ac49759b62835a4&type=album



P.S. And I found original, 12:20, It's clearly seen

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DeXM said:

Are there any perspective APFSDS development processes?

Also found video from VT, but  on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military

  Hide contents

Also found video from W, but, alas, on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military



I found some comparison for BM Oplot and VT-4.
It says about CH1000B transmisson.

  Hide contents

Mt966NLudqc.jpg?size=1364x812&quality=96


Previosly, I saw some photos

 

  Hide contents

https://sun9-27.userapi.com/impg/vhGFJRoN9WU2k42cq01GSH9ULNmPl8cNxDp0Vw/I_JBBgWZFyI.jpg?size=2160x1620&quality=96&sign=2599cce4e1bab968919939a90923c3ba&type=album

 

 

 

 

 

  Hide contents

https://sun9-19.userapi.com/impg/zn6DZRAD-oVoLyMnSdqWVQH6SceuxwAZOYlXFw/FRkz8ifBH7o.jpg?size=2560x1920&quality=96&sign=db05f22ec2ea78f40dd598c6fb930c08&type=album

 

 

So, it says about CH1000B too.

Is it possible that the difference between the CH1000 (99a) from the CH1000B (vT4) is that on 99A (presumably, since I still did not find documentary evidence or video with a demonstration) - three reverse speeds transmission, unlike two at VT?


And I'd like to clarify if theres full video of this screenshot?

  Hide contents

WUeA9JGu7ZY.jpg?size=600x401&quality=96&sign=8aa589693cda691e0ac49759b62835a4&type=album



P.S. And I found original, 12:20, It's clearly seen

 


 

Sorry I don't know much about transmission. The comparison graph you posted is from Object 477, I can upload the full graph if you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DeXM said:

Are there any perspective APFSDS development processes?

Also found video from VT, but  on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military

  Reveal hidden contents

Also found video from W, but, alas, on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military



I found some comparison for BM Oplot and VT-4.
It says about CH1000B transmisson.

  Hide contents

Mt966NLudqc.jpg?size=1364x812&quality=96


Previosly, I saw some photos

 

  Reveal hidden contents

https://sun9-27.userapi.com/impg/vhGFJRoN9WU2k42cq01GSH9ULNmPl8cNxDp0Vw/I_JBBgWZFyI.jpg?size=2160x1620&quality=96&sign=2599cce4e1bab968919939a90923c3ba&type=album

 

 

 

 

 

  Hide contents

https://sun9-19.userapi.com/impg/zn6DZRAD-oVoLyMnSdqWVQH6SceuxwAZOYlXFw/FRkz8ifBH7o.jpg?size=2560x1920&quality=96&sign=db05f22ec2ea78f40dd598c6fb930c08&type=album

 

 

So, it says about CH1000B too.

Is it possible that the difference between the CH1000 (99a) from the CH1000B (vT4) is that on 99A (presumably, since I still did not find documentary evidence or video with a demonstration) - three reverse speeds transmission, unlike two at VT?


And I'd like to clarify if theres full video of this screenshot?

  Hide contents

WUeA9JGu7ZY.jpg?size=600x401&quality=96&sign=8aa589693cda691e0ac49759b62835a4&type=album



P.S. And I found original, 12:20, It's clearly seen

 


 

So from what I know, CH1000 and CH1000B all have the same number of reverse gears, the difference is that CH1000 requires manual gear shifting while CH1000B has an more advanced automatic gear shifting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a photo of 99A prototype (the official name for this prototype is WZ123B) in 00s. It was based on a ZTZ-99's chassis while have a brand new fully welded turret (which eventually became the production model's turret) and new 125/L52 main gun (this experimental variant of long barrel 125 gun never went into actual production because there are some issues regarding its barrel life and quality control).

 

https://ibb.co/MRWZgGN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

Sorry I don't know much about transmission. The comparison graph you posted is from Object 477, I can upload the full graph if you want.

It seems that I will need to try to contact the object-477. Is it possible to contact him? Perhaps he has documentary evidence? I have a full version, just cut out this paragraph to do more clearly.

 

9 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

So from what I know, CH1000 and CH1000B all have the same number of reverse gears, the difference is that CH1000 requires manual gear shifting while CH1000B has an more advanced automatic gear shifting. 


Are there any documentary confirmation? Just in all sources that I found about CH1000 (99A) it was argued that the gear of the reverse - 3, but for some serious documentary evidence, I did not find it (and I'm not sure if they were in public domain)






P.S. Sorry, I forgot to place link to the video

From 12:20



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DeXM said:

It seems that I will need to try to contact the object-477. Is it possible to contact him? Perhaps he has documentary evidence? I have a full version, just cut out this paragraph to do more clearly.

 


Are there any documentary confirmation? Just in all sources that I found about CH1000 (99A) it was argued that the gear of the reverse - 3, but for some serious documentary evidence, I did not find it (and I'm not sure if they were in public domain)






P.S. Sorry, I forgot to place link to the video

From 12:20



 

Nope, it is from the memory of some former tankers, so take it with a grain of salt I guess? Object 477 is on SH, you can contact him directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TINDALOS said:

Nope, it is from the memory of some former tankers, so take it with a grain of salt I guess? Object 477 is on SH, you can contact him directly.


 

Spoiler

Perhaps I'm looking for not where it is necessary (still not used to SH), but on the SH is Molota_477?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By Beer
      I haven't found an appropriate thread where to put some interesting rare stuff related to WW2 development, be it industrial one or makeshift field modifications. 
       
      Let's start with two things. The first one is a relatively recently found rarity from Swedish archives - a drawing of ČKD/BMM V8H-Sv tank. The drawing and a letter was found by WoT enthusiasts in Swedish archives in 2014 (the original announcement and the drawing source is here). The drawing is from a message dated 8th September 1941. One of the reasons why this drawing was not known before may be that the Czech archives were partially destroyed by floods in 2002. Anyway it is an export modification of the V-8-H tank accepted into Czechoslovak service as ST vz.39 but never produced due to the cancelation of all orders after Münich 1938 (for the same reason negotiations about licence production in Britain failed). Also later attempt to sell the tank to Romania failed due to BMM being fully busy with Wehrmacht priority orders. The negotiations with Sweden about licence production of V8H-Sv lasted till 1942, at least in May 1942 Swedish commission was present in Prague for negotiations. The tank differed compared to the base ST vz.39 in thicker armor with different front hull shape (armor 60 mm @ 30° on the hull front and also 60 mm on the turret; all sides were 40 mm thick). The tank was heavier (20 tons) and had the LT vz.38 style suspension with probably even larger wheels. The engine was still the same Praga NR V8 (240-250 Hp per source). The armament was unchanged with 47 mm Škoda A11 gun and two vz.37 HMG. The commander's cupola was of the simple small rotating type similar to those used on AH-IV-Sv tankettes. It is known that the Swedes officially asked to arm the tank with 75 mm gun, replace the engine with Volvo V12 and adding third HMG to the back of the turret. In the end the Swedes decided to prefer their own Strv/m42. 

      Source of the drawing
       
      The second is makeshift field modification found on Balkans. It appears Ustasha forces (and possibly some SS anti-partizan units) used several Italian M15/42 medium tanks with turrets from Pz.38(t). There are several photos of such hybrids but little more is known. On one photo it is possible to see Ustasha registration number U.O. 139.

      Few more photos of such hybrid.
       
      It appears that the source of all those photos to be found on the internet is this book, Armoured units of the Axis forces in southeastern Europe in WW2 by Dinko Predoevic. 
       
    • By Monochromelody
      The Al Khalid derived from Norinco Type 90IIM MBT. It was in the early 90s, when India started to test their Arjun MBT. Pakistanis looked for a MBT design that could be produced by herself. 
      Norinco provided their own Type 90IIM prototype, this is an MBT design which comprised many Western components, such as engine and transmission. 

      There were 4 prototypes for Al-Khalid development, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. 
      P1 has a Chinese tank diesel engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission. 
      P2 has a British Perkins CV12 Condor diesel engine with French SESM ESM500 transmission. 
      P3 has a Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 2-cycle boxer engine with its own twin planetary gearbox. 
      P4 has a German MB871 engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission, similar to South Korean K1 MBT. 

      Norinco and Pakistanis planned to adopt one of the Western powerpack at first, but due to CoCom (Coordinating Committee for Export to Communist Countries) restrictions, China is under embargo, which means China would not import weapons form Western countries. Obviously P3 powerplant would be the only choice. All those descriptions on the internet about ESM500 in Al-Khalid is fatally wrong. 
       
      The Al-Khalid pre-production batch and production version all equipped with Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 powerpack.
      It is an extremely compact design, the engine laid transversely in engine room, twin planetary gearboxes connect to both left and right end. The 6TD-2 has two crankshafts: the front one drives the mechanical supercharger, while the rear one drives the gearboxes. The cooling system covering the whole engine room, the engine itself has no mechanical connection to the cooling system, and the cooling system doesn't need mechanical drive. The cooling system based on a unique principle: exhaust gas driven ejector. The exhaust gas from the engine is injected through the outlet ducting, produce a low pressure in the outlet side, that will suck in cold air from the inlet side. This principle is also used in the T-64, T-80UD and T-84, but as far as I know, Swedish Ikv 91 is the only western tank that have similar cooling principle. 
       
      As a result, the total length of powerpack is significantly shortened, much more shorter than the European powerpack mentioned above. This leads to a spare storage room between the fighting compartment and the engine compartment. This storage is for extra ammunition and fuel, when turret points 3 or 9 o'clock, the top cover of the storage could be opened from outside, containing 10 rounds for main gun, with projectiles on the outsides, semi-combustible charges on the inside.
      The data table from HIT also describe the ammunition capacity as 39+10, means that 22 ready rounds in the T-72 type carousel autoloader, 17 backup rounds scatter around the fighting compartment, and extra 10 rounds could be carried in the storage room. 
       
      The driver of Al-Khalid control the vehicle via steering wheel and an automatic gear control box. The steering wheel and gear control box send electrical signals to the computer, then computer control the hydraulic servo actuator to perform engage and disengage of brakes and clutches, making steering and gear changes, as well as adjusting the speed and torque of the engine.
       
      Mechanically the gearboxes are nearly the same as T-64s and T-72s, but have different side reducer unit. The KMDB side reducer unit is designed as a secondary gearbox, acting like a forward-reverse selector. When both reducers were put into reverse, the vehicle can reverse using the normal forward ranges. From 1st gear to 4th gear, all could be used as high speed reverse, and that's why KMDB said this is a 7F4R gearbox system. And if only one reducer was put into reverse, the track will be driving in opposites direction, causing the vehicle turns within its tracks, a.k.a. pivot steer or center steer. T-84 also applied this driving and steering system.  
       
      The advantages of Al-Khalid's powerpack is the versatility: all 3 types of MBT in the Pakistanis arsenal, T-80UD, T-84, Al-Khalid, share the same engine and gearbox. 
    • By phasers on stun
      Fellow fish - imagine you had some money to develop the "next generation" 20-40mm" modular architecture turret.  Of course, you could talk about sensor fusion, using AI to detect threats, better / more integrated sensors... targetting linked to drones etc... But is this the way forwards. ?
       
      What is the SOTA 30mm turret on the market ? - more importantly, what are it's attributes ?? [ no need to name the manufacturer unless you want to] 
      Built in APS ?
      intelligent Armour ?
      Reconfigurability ?
      Self Repair ?
       
      We all have ideas... what would you see as a truly game changing set of characteristics ?  
       
      I think the T2000 looks interesting and there are some nice turrets from lower profile companies (as seen at AUSA).  
       
      Alternatively, we might be at the end of the roadmap - "gun + armour + sight is good enough"
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Akula_941
      Anti-air bobcat design to take away driver's hearing in maximum efficiency

      SH11  155mm SPG


×
×
  • Create New...